British Lawyer

Приветствую, Не должны, т.к. апостиль не требуется.

Добрый день, Все детали - здесь : www.legalcentre.org Можете так же просто позвонить мне, 07791145923 (Mob/Viber/WhatsApp).

Очередные изменения в Иммиграционных Правилах 08 December 2017 – Helpful and just interesting Immigration News from the Immigration Lawyers who can really help - www.legalcentre.org – Ph/Viber/WhatApp : 07791145923 >>> Statement of changes to Immigration Rules HC 309, 7 December 2017 : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...7-december-2017</noindex> The purpose of the main changes is to: · Take account of the future commencement of the immigration bail provisions in Schedule 10 to the Immigration Act 2016. · Provide for entry clearance to be issued electronically. · Allow standard and marriage/civil partnership visit visa holders to transit using the same visa. · Clarify and remove inconsistencies from the rules relating to indefinite leave to remain for main applicants and their dependants in work categories. · Double the number of available places in the Tier 1 (Exceptional Talent) category to 2,000, and allow accelerated settlement for certain applicants. · Consolidate and clarify the rules for Tier 1 (Entrepreneur) applicants. · Make new Tier 2 provisions for research positions and for students switching from Tier 4. Into effect from: · The changes to Appendix M set out in paragraph M1., and to Appendix N set out in paragraph N2. of the statement shall take effect on 28 December 2017. · The changes to Appendix G set out in paragraph G1. of the statement shall take effect on 1 January 2018. However, in relation to those changes, if an application has been made for entry clearance or leave to enter or remain before 1 January 2018, the application will be decided in accordance with the Immigration Rules in force on 31 December 2017. · The changes to Part 6A set out in paragraphs 6A.22 and 6A.23, to Appendix A set out in paragraphs A16. to A19., and to Appendix J set out in paragraphs J1. to J11. of the statement shall take effect on 11 January 2018. However, if an applicant has made an application for entry clearance or leave to remain using a Certificate of Sponsorship that was assigned to him by his Sponsor before 11 January 2018, the application will be decided in accordance with the rules in force on 10 January 2018. · The changes to Part 5 set out in paragraphs 5.13 to 5.15 and 5.18 to 5.19, to Part 7 set out in paragraphs 7.3 to 7.5 and 7.7, to Part 8 set out in paragraphs 8.20 and 8.36, and to Appendix Armed Forces set out in paragraph AF2. of the statement shall take effect on the commencement of Schedule 10 to the Immigration Act 2016. · The other changes set out in the statement shall take effect on 11 January 2018. However, in relation to those changes, if an application has been made for entry clearance or leave to enter or remain before 11 January 2018, the application will be decided in accordance with the Immigration Rules in force on 10 January 2018.

Приветствую, Итак : Мне подаваться на ILR как жене британца в марте 2019 ( и дальше на гражданство), но в следующем году мы планируем много путешествовать. В связи с этим вопрос, 90 дней отсутствия это только в последний год перед подачей на гражданство? - Да. NB: 90 дней можно растянуть без дополнительных доказательств до 100 дней. Я так понимаю, что суммарно за 5 лет нельзя отсуствовать более чем 450 дней и не более 90 дней в последний год. -Да (+см. выше). т.е. например если в 4й год отсутствовать 120 дней, а в последний 5й не более 90, то это же не нарушение требования, верно? - Нет И еще, правильно ли я понимаю, что день выезда и вьезда не считаются при подсчете дней отсутствия? - Нет, не считаются.

Пожалуйста. Рад был помочь Вам. Добро пожаловать в Великобританию.

07 December 2017 – Helpful and just interesting Immigration News from the Immigration Lawyers who can really help - www.legalcentre.org – Ph/Viber/WhatApp : 07791145923 >>> UK BA can revoke ILR without the right of appeal Under the current Rules and, namely, under the Section 76, the UK BA can revoke the ILR (Indefinite Leave to Remain) with no right of appeal. Should that happen, the remedy may the the so-called Judicial Review (JR)

Приветствую, Ребенок родился после брака, т.е. в 2013 году. То есть ребенок по рождению уже гражданка Британии. Дело за получением паспорта через консульство UK. Хотя они могут "перебросить" в Ливерпуль. Обычно занимает несколько месяцев.

06 December 2017 – Helpful and just interesting Immigration News from the Immigration Lawyers who can really help - www.legalcentre.org - Ph/Viber/WhatApp: 07791145923 >>> Paid for the Same Day Service (PSC/PEO) application but submitting the application after the leave (visa) expires ? You are risking a refusal Unless there were expeptional circumstances, under the Para 34 of the Rules the UK BA is likely to refuse the PEO application when such an application lodged even on the following day the leave (visa) expires, despite the application paid for on-line before the visa expired : 34G: “For the purposes of these rules, the date on which an application (or a variation of application in accordance with paragraph 34E) is made is: … (iv) where the application is made via the online application process, the date on which the online application is submitted whether or not a subsequent appointment is made at a Home Office premium service centre” >>> UK Visas and Immigration Guidance - Employer sponsorship: restricted certificate allocations (4 December 2017) : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...ate-allocations</noindex> A list of restricted certificates allocated each month for employer sponsorship in Tier 2 (General) >>> UK Visas and Immigration guidance: Country returns guide (4 December 2017) : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...y-returns-guide</noindex> Guidance on returning immigration offenders to their country of origin

Пожалуйста. Рад был помочь.

Opal - рекомендую - комиссия - 50 пенсов была раньше.

Вчера, PEO Solihull (услуга "<noindex>виза за 1 день</noindex>"). Люблю работать с клиентами непосредственно в отделении Premium Service Centre (PSC). Бывают такие моменты, что я в UK BA провожу больше времени, чем в офисе. Сотрудники UK BA шутят, что мне уже пора выделить рабочее место у них в отделении UK BA. В декабре в PEO очень много людей.Были моменты, когда даже не хватало мест, и люди стояли в проходе. Все хотят получить решение быстро, в тот же день, чтобы поехать на праздники в отпуск, к родным или просто чтобы иметь документы на руках и не ждать решения месяцами. Вчера подавал на ПМЖ клиентке (ILR, SET(O)). Переход в сизы PBS на ПМЖ. UK BA немного ошиблись в первоначальной регистрации статуса клиентки, поэтому пришлось помочь коллегам, т.е. в диалоге за 1 минуту проблема была решена.В почтовом заявлении это было бы не возможно и срок ожидание решения затянулся ы на долгие месяцы... При личной подаче заявлений мною все по другому. Так как я всегда готовлю документы так, как сотрудники UK BA бы делали бы сами, соответственно, вчера был поставлен очередной рекорд скорости рассмотрения заявления - 20 (двадцать) минут. Всех с наступающими Праздниками.

Приветствую, Уже вижу проблему - Вы не указали возраст родителей и конкретно социальный статус Вашей мамы. Тут могут быть ньюансы. По переводам. На гостевую визу самостоятельные переводы могут пройти, но я рекомендую сделат все грамотно с первого раза. Я могу заверить переводы, с декларацией и печатью. Я отправляю документы клиентам DHL. Их последних 3-4 заявлений родителей форумчан на гостевую визу, документы доходили на Украину за 3 дня.

04 December 2017 – Helpful and just interesting Immigration News from the Immigration Lawyers who can really help - www.legalcentre.org - Ph: 0330 001 0342 or 07791145923 >>> Home Office guidance on EEA public policy/security decisions updated : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/syste...ecurity-2.0.pdf</noindex> >>> Asylum “lottery”: some hearing centres grant twice as many appeals : <noindex>http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-42153862</noindex> First-tier Tribunal appeals against asylum decisions are twice as likely to succeed at some hearing centres compared to others, a BBC investigation has found. 47% of appeals succeeded at Taylor House, whereas the success rate was as low as 21% at Yarl’s Wood and 24% in Belfast. The data comes from Freedom of Information requests covering January 2013 to September 2016 and excluding fast-track cases. >>> Failure to provide evidence of right to work not a fair reason to dismiss, says Employment Appeal Tribunal : <noindex>http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2017/0250_16_0510.html</noindex> In the case of Baker v Abellio London Ltd [2017] UKEAT 0250_16_0510, the Employment Appeal Tribunal found that not having documents confirming an employee’s right to work is not in itself a fair reason for dismissal. However, genuinely believing that you need the documents can be a fair reason for dismissal >>> Proportionality principle no help in EU mother’s income support claim : www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2017/440.pdf LO v SSWP (IS) [2017] UKUT 440 (AAC) involved the overlap between EU law, family law and welfare benefits, focusing particularly on the role of proportionality. All this is academic to LO, who just wanted her income support. Despite compelling personal circumstances, there was no basis on which the tribunal could find a right to reside and make her eligible for that benefit. The decision affirms the existing line of cases in this area, but the idea of proportionality as a liberalising influence may be examined again by the courts. >>> Expert reports in human rights cases must be up to scratch : <noindex>http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2017/1871.html</noindex> In HK, HH, SK and FK v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWCA Civ 1871 the Court of Appeal found that asylum seekers could be returned to Bulgaria under the Dublin III Regulation. Removal would not violate the appellants’ Article 3 rights, despite medical reports on their poor mental health and NGO evidence on the poor treatment of asylum seekers by the Bulgarian authorities

Приветствую, Имею лицензию/регистрацию в МСIL заверять переводы на 3 языках : - ENGLISH - RUSSIAN - UKRAINIAN

Приветствую, Не все так печально. Где Вы таких "советчиков" берете ? - Ссылка на первоисточник по морякам : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/syste...ement_Final.pdf</noindex> "5.5.4. Where the applicant’s partner is a seafarer resident in the UK but spends most of their time working at sea and qualifies for the HMRC Seafarers Earnings Deduction (which is evidenced, for example, by a letter from their accountant or from HMRC), they will be considered as a person resident in the UK for the purposes of assessing their income from salaried or non-salaried employment. They will not be treated as an overseas sponsor returning to the UK." - По "забывчивости" о существующем на тот момент партнере. Могут быть проблемы, если ничего не предпринять. Могу помочь и для начала дать детальный анализ ситуации, что и как и когда Вам лучше сделать. Я здесь : <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html</noindex>

01 December 2017 – Helpful and just interesting Immigration News from the Immigration Lawyers who can really help - www.legalcentre.org - Ph: 0330 001 0342 or 07791145923 >>> Immigration changes set out in the Industrial Strategy White Paper - Building a Britain Fit for the Future (1 December 2017) : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...-for-the-future</noindex> The key points relation to immigration are as follows : · "We have doubled the number of available visas in the Tier 1 (Exceptional Talent) route available to those who are already recognised as global leaders or who show considerable promise in their fields. This recognises the importance of supporting those working in the digital technology, science, arts and creative sectors, and ensures that the UK can continue to welcome international talent to work in these key emerging and innovative industries. (p88) · The government is also changing immigration rules to enable world-leading scientists and researchers endorsed under the Tier 1 route to apply for settlement after three years (p88) · and to make it quicker for highly-skilled students to apply to work in the UK after finishing their degrees. (p89) · We are relaxing the labour market test to allow UK Research and Innovation and other select organisations to sponsor researchers, making it easier to hire international researchers and members of established research teams. (p89) · The National Academies are considering how they can encourage top global research talent to come to the UK through the Research and Innovation Talent scheme within Tier 1 of the visa system. (p89) Wider policy comments: Research and innovation are global endeavours and talented and experienced people in these fields are internationally mobile. Businesses have talent scouts around the world to spot opportunities in the most creative clusters, and investment tends to follow talent. The UK has the second largest bilateral flow of scientists and we want the UK to be a magnet for world-class talent. We will increase the number of scientists working in the UK and enable leading scientists from around the world to work here. We will continue to recruit and retain the best talent and ensure the UK remains a world-leader in science and innovation through our Rutherford Fund. (p88) We want to continue to be an attractive destination for the world’s most talented and innovative people and the UK will continue to remain a global, outward looking nation and home to the brightest and best. Our thriving and flexible labour market continues to attract international businesses and investment, enabling businesses to respond and adapt to economic change. To ensure that our labour market remains competitive, the Migration Advisory Committee has recently undertaken a wide-ranging consultation to form a UK-wide view of our skills needs, ensuring our future migration system supports our Industrial Strategy. We will consider the Migration Advisory Committee’s forthcoming conclusions carefully. (p125)"

Хорошее начало дня. Курьер DX доставил очередные 4 х BRP карточки клиентов : - Семья из 4-х человек*, <noindex>легализация </noindex>(*NB В семье есть еще один ребенок, но я ему уже получил гражданство, поэтому этому ребенку BRP не был нужен) -<noindex> Permanent Residence</noindex> (EEA(PR)) для гражданина Украины (после 5-и лет брака с EU) Кстати, доставку BRP с EEAPR я пропустил вчера, когда как всегда по четвергам подавал заявления форумчан <noindex>в личном визите в нашем местном PEO,</noindex> где я уже 15 лет подаю такие заявления. Попросил курьера привезти BRP не следующий день, и вот только что курьер привез все 4 BRP карточки. На земле стало на 4 человека счастливее под Рождество.

Татьяна, Вы задаете вопросы, которые вырваны их контекста. Ответить на них "вот так вот сходу за 3 дня до конца Вашей визы" сложно. Меня уже насторожили пару пунктов в Ваших предполагаемых ответах. Детально могу обсудить здесь : <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html</noindex>

Приветствую, Да, однозначно. В близжайшее время получите решение.

Из недавних заявлений клиентов: Почтовые заявлния (UK и за рубежем для приезда в UK): - Representative of Overseas Company (ILR) : 2 месяца - AN (EU) – 3 месяца 3 недели; UK BA запрашивал дополнительные документы т. к. EU получила PR “задним числом» и этот срок был более чем 2 года тому назад - AN (EU) – 1 месяц и 1 неделя - EEA(PR) — Non-EEA – 2 месяца 1 неделя Личный визит в отделение UK BA где заявления рассматриваются в день подачи : -FLR(M) – переход со студенческой визы — 2.5 часа -FLR(M) – пррдление 2 часа -SET(O) – после Tier 2 (General) – 2.5 часа -SET(M) – супруга британца — 2 часа

Спасибо. Надеюсь, скоро решение получите.

29 November 2017 – Helpful and just interesting Immigration News from the Immigration Lawyers who can really help - www.legalcentre.org - Ph: 0330 001 0342 or 07791145923 >>> The definition of a "current account" in relation to the Bank Account measures under the Immigration Act 2016 (21 November 2017) by the UK BA From the 1st January 2018, the Immigration Act 2016 (the Act) will require banks to perform periodic checks on ‘current accounts’ to ensure that they are not operated by ‘disqualified persons’ (i.e. a person who is in the UK but who does not have the required leave to enter or remain in the UK). So, what exactly is the definition of the “current account” by the UK BA ? According to the UK BA, the Government is not able to provide legal guidance on the Immigration Act 2016, and this information does not constitute legal guidance. There is no legal definition of a current account, but the Government set out its view of a current account when the Immigration Act 2014 regime was debated in Parliament. On 12 December 2016, Lord Young reiterated this view in relation to the Immigration Act 2016 (Col 15, Vol 777). The UK BA also provids a link to relevant Hansard debate below this. “Not all bank accounts are within scope of the requirement to make an immigration check under the 2016 Act. This instrument specifies that current accounts operated by or for individuals who are acting for the purposes of a trade, business or profession are excluded from the requirement to make an immigration check. In practice this means that firms are required to conduct checks on existing personal current accounts. Firms are not required to extend checks to all existing current accounts such as corporate or business accounts. This ensures that the checks undertaken by banks are appropriately targeted and proportionate. This reflects the Government’s ongoing view that current accounts are the gateway product to other financial services and a settled life in the UK. Such an account would be expected to provide functionality to hold deposits and make withdrawals without having to give notice. It would also typically enable the customer to receive and make payments through a number of different methods, including by cheque, direct debit, standing order, continuous payment authority or other electronic payments. Withdrawals, money transfers and other payment transactions can typically be conducted through various channels including ATMs, branch, online, mobile or telephone banking. Many current accounts also have overdraft facilities. For the purposes of the Immigration Act, “current accounts” should also continue to include “basic bank accounts”. The requirement to make an immigration check does not apply to savings accounts, which in the Government’s view are intended to be opened for the primary purpose of accruing savings and not for day-to-day transactional banking, but which may provide some of the functionality I have just referred to. This also takes into account existing prohibitions in the 2014 Act, which mean that a disqualified person cannot evade the legislation by closing their current account and opening a business account as a sole trader or a charity. I turn now to notifications. If a firm makes an immigration check on a personal current account and finds a match, the bank is required to notify the Home Office using a secure Home Office portal. To allow the Home Office to confirm the match and instruct on next steps, this instrument requires firms to provide certain information. This includes details of any other accounts that the firm holds for the disqualified person and the balances held in those accounts. Information about regular payments into accounts above a threshold of £200 has been included to allow the Home Office to identify patterns of payments that may constitute evidence of illegal working. The requirement to provide information is limited to what firms hold and can retrieve. It does not require the further investigation of data not held. The Home Office will then confirm the match, based on its data, and instruct the firm on the next steps.” Individuals should also be referred to gov.uk for guidance on what to do if their account is closing because they are in the UK illegally: <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...igration-status</noindex>

У кого какие новости по срокам рассмотрения заявлений по категории муж/жена/партнер лица с ILR/британского гражданина/гражданки ?

Приветствую, Была одна клиентка, то ли Life in the UK с 5-го раза сдала, то ли B1...уже не помню. В итоге все сдала и <noindex>я получил ILR за пару часов в нашем местном PEO</noindex>.

28 November 2017 – Helpful and just interesting Immigration News from the Immigration Lawyers who can really help - www.legalcentre.org - Ph: 0330 001 0342 or 07791145923 >>> Domestic violence cases can attract a right of appeal, says High Court : <noindex>http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2017/2589.html</noindex> Since April 2015, only very limited types of immigration case can be appealed. In the case of AT, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWHC 2589 (Admin), the High Court found that despite what the Immigration Rules say, an application for indefinite leave to remain on the basis of domestic violence can be a human rights claim and therefore attract a right of appeal. >>>UK BA pays out £24,515.43 by order of a Deputy High Court judge for false imprisonment : <noindex>http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2017/2857.html</noindex> Last week Suraj Saptoka was in total awarded (including special damages for loss of earnings) the amount of £24,515.42, together with interest, by order of a Deputy High Court judge for false imprisonment in the case of Sapkota v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWHC 2857 (Admin). Mr Saptoka had been unlawfully detained for 36 days after immigration officials wrongfully decided he was attempting to extend his leave to remain by entering into a bigamous marriage. This massive pay out by the UK BA is not unique. The Secretary of State routinely makes offers to settle where she concedes the unlawfulness of the detention, meaning pure quantum cases often do not reach the courtroom. >>> First Tier Tribunal slapped down for ignoring Immigration Rules in deportation case : <noindex>http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2017/1782.html</noindex> In Secretary of State for the Home Department v AM (Jamaica) [2017] EWCA Civ 1782 the Court of Appeal found that a First-tier Tribunal decision to allow a Jamaican man’s deportation appeal under Article 8 contained a material error of law and set it aside. In criminal deportation appeals, the court found, the FTT must do more than “simply” engage in a Razgar assessment under Article 8. A finding that deportation would be disproportionate, without considering the substance of paragraphs 398 and 399 of the Immigration Rules, is a material error of law. >>> Strasbourg dismisses compensation claim for not allowing asylum seeker to work : <noindex>http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-174789</noindex> Daniel Negassi v the United Kingdom (application no. 64337/14) was an appeal to the European Court of Human Rights with a complaint that the Home Office’s failure to grant Mr Negassi permission to work, while waiting for a decision on his asylum claim, was a breach of his right to respect for his private life under Article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR). The court found Mr Negassi’s complaint to be inadmissible because it could not be said that the applicant suffered a “significant disadvantage” in the sense that the decision not to grant him permission to work led to serious adverse consequences. Mr Negassi, the court stated, had not suffered from any actual prejudice. >>> UK BA Guidance on Fee waiver: Human Rights-Based and other specified applications : <noindex>https://www.google.co.uk/url…</noindex> >>> Dental x-rays in age assessment: art not science : <noindex>http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/IAC/2017/446.html</noindex> The Upper Tribunal Judge Rintoul’s elegant, succinct summary of the law on age assessment, with which he opens the determination in R (AS) v Kent County Council (age assessment; dental evidence) [2017] UKUT 446, reminds one that pinpointing the age of a young person claiming asylum, other than where there is documentary proof, is an art, not a science. It is a question of fact for decision by the court or tribunal itself, as the Supreme Court explained in R (A) v London Borough of Croydon [2009] UKSC 8. >>> Scottish judge: discrimination based on immigration status unlawful : <noindex>https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/search-judgments/judgment…</noindex> There are a number of interesting findings in the Court of Session judgment, published today, in DN against Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] CSOH 144. DN is a Ugandan child who applied for entry clearance to join her mother in the UK. Her mother holds discretionary leave (DL) to remain. DN’s application and subsequent appeal were refused, and her applications for leave to appeal were also refused. The later hearing at the Court of Session established that the discrimination based on the immigration status was unlawful, though. This is a rare and a significant finding of discrimination and it will be interesting to see how (if at all) it will be taken on board by the Secretary of State. >>> The Home Office is entitled to ignore a judge’s decision to grant bail : <noindex>http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2017/1893.html</noindex> The Court of Appeal has reluctantly agreed that the Home Office has the power to ignore a First-tier Tribunal’s decision to grant bail to an immigration detainee. However, on the particular facts of the case, the decision to refuse consent to bail was deemed unlawful. Despite the impropriety of a departmental civil servant being able to overrule an independent and impartial judge, the Court of Appeal was duty bound to give effect to the clear intention of Parliament. This decision could lead to more regular use of the power to refuse consent by the Home Office, which is deeply concerning.