British Lawyer

20 December 2017 – Helpful and just interesting Immigration News from the Immigration Lawyers who can really help - www.legalcentre.org – Ph/Viber/WhatsApp : +44(0)7791145923 >>> Restricted Certificate of Sponsorship Cut Off Point - 20 December 2017 The current intelligence from ILPA members suggests that the Restricted Certificate of Sponsorship allocation has been reached this month and therefore the minimum number of points required is 65. This has meant that only applications with a Resident Labour Market Test and a salary of £68,000 (or above) have been approved.

Приветствую, Если знание английского позволяют, то вот ссылка на первоисточник : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/family-permit</noindex> Если хотите получить полную информацию на основании моей работы с форумчанами и не только по этой категории на протяжении пары десятков лет - см. здесь : <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html</noindex>

19 December 2017 – Helpful and just interesting Immigration News from the Immigration Lawyers who can really help - www.legalcentre.org – Ph/Viber/WhatApp : 07791145923 >>> Court of Appeal: visa conditions do not count unless notified in writing: <noindex>http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2017/2134.html</noindex> In the recent decision in Anwar v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWCA Civ 2134 confirms that if the Home Office wishes to impose visa conditions, it must give people written notice of those conditions. If the Home Office fails to do this, or is unable to produce evidence that the notice was sent, it will be unable to rely on any purported breach of a visa condition to justify a decision to refuse a subsequent application, curtail a person’s leave, or remove a person from the UK. This decision could have wide-reaching ramifications, given that it is not currently Home Office practice to outline any conditions imposed when granting a visa application. This judgement appears to suggest that the Home Office has consistently and systematically failed to impose conditions when granting applications for leave to remain. This is particularly significant in categories such as Tier 1 (Investor), Tier 1 (Entrepreneur), and Tier 4 (General) where there are numerous, often complex, conditions which must be complied with. That means that if the Home Office has failed to give written notice of these conditions, they do not apply. >>> Court of Appeal says test in Zambrano cases remains compulsion not choice: <noindex>http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2017/2028.html</noindex> Head note: “the decision in Chavez-Vilchez represents no departure from the principle of EU law laid down in Zambrano, although it does constitute a reminder that the principle must be applied with careful enquiry, paying attention to the relevant criteria and considerations, and focussing not on whether the EU citizen child (or dependant) can remain in legal theory, but whether they can do so in practice. There is no alteration in the test of compulsion. [paragraph 72]”. It is clear from the case of Patel that this “test of compulsion” remains difficult to meet. In other words, Zambrano rights remain limited. >>> Home Office EU deportation decision overturned for ignoring EU law: <noindex>http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2017/1752.html</noindex> In R (Decker) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2017] EWCA Civ 1752, the Court of Appeal found that the Secretary of State must show her workings. She, and the immigration tribunals, must explicitly apply relevant tests set out in the EEA Regulations when making decisions. It is an error of law to simply identify considerations which could be relevant without specifically having regard to what the regulations say. The court also held that a deportation order may be valid even if it is signed when the subject of the order is outside the UK. >>> Immigration tribunal cannot conditionally allow appeals: <noindex>http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/IAC/2017/490.html</noindex> In an Upper Tribunal determination that will come as a surprise to no-one other than the judge whose decision was under appeal, President Lane has held that it is not possible for the tribunal to allow an appeal on a conditional basis (such as “the appeal is allowed provided the Appellant provides (document) in the future”). >>> The Law Commission's review of Immigration Rules included in new projects list : <noindex>https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/13th-programme-of-law-reform/</noindex> From the project description: “Hundreds of thousands of decisions are made annually under the Immigration Rules. Decisions which can be life changing for those seeking entry or leave to remain in the UK and their families. But the Rules are widely criticised for being long, complex, and difficult to use. On 1 May 2017, the Rules totalled 1096 pages in length and their drafting is poor. Many provisions are duplicated, cross references are often incomplete and some parts are incomprehensible. Our project will not involve any substantive policy changes or any new legislation. It will instead aim [to] redraft the Rules to make them simpler and more accessible to the user. The review will not impact the legal basis on which a person has leave to enter or remain in the UK”. >>> Northern Ireland appeal case on “Chen parents” referred to EU court The case of an Albanian couple living in Northern Ireland has been referred to Luxembourg over a conflict between English, Irish and European Union law. The decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union in their case could help thousands of other families to establish a right of residence in the UK. The parents in Ermira Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department are “Chen parents” – non-EU citizens with EU citizen children who can claim derivative rights of residence so long as they are self-sufficient. Two of the Bajratari children are Irish, but although the husband has been working, he has been doing so unlawfully since the expiry of a previous residence card. The Home Office refused to issue a new one, arguing that income from this illegal labour cannot be used to establish self-sufficiency, as per W (China) and X (China) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] EWCA Civ 1494. The appellants argued, among other things, that this English Court of Appeal decision conflicts both with the original CJEU decision in C-200/02 Zhu and Chen and with a decision of the High Court of Ireland in OA v Minister for Justice, Equality and Defence [2014] IEHC 384. The AIRE Centre intervened as a third party. >>> Tribunal gives guidance on assessing truthfulness in asylum cases: <noindex>http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/IAC/2017/491.html</noindex> In KB & AH (credibility-structured approach) Pakistan [2017] UKUT 491 (IAC) the tribunal declined to give updated country guidance on the situation of Ahmadis in Pakistan because the case apparently turned on its own facts. This is often the case where the facts favour the appellant; where the facts favour the Home Office a case often seems to be of more general interest. The head note : “1. The ‘Credibility Indicators’ identified in the Home Office Asylum Policy Instruction, Assessing credibility and refugee status Version 3.0, 6 January 2015 (which can be summarised as comprising sufficiency of detail; internal consistency; external consistency; and plausibility), provide a helpful framework within which to conduct a credibility assessment. They facilitate a more structured approach apt to help judges avoid the temptation to look at the evidence in a one-dimensional way or to focus in an ad hoc way solely on whichever indicator or factor appears foremost or opportune. 2. However, any reference to a structured approach in relation to the subject matter of credibility assessment must carry a number of important (interrelated) caveats, among which are the following: -the aforementioned indicators are merely indicators, not necessary conditions; -they are not an exhaustive list; -assessment of credibility being a highly fact-sensitive affair, their main role is to help make sure, where relevant, that the evidence is considered in a number of well-recognised respects; -making use of these indicators is not a substitute for the requirement to consider the evidence as a whole or ‘in the round’; -it remains that credibility assessment is only part of evidence assessment and, as Lord Dyson reminded decision-makers in MA (Somalia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department[2010] UKSC 49 at [33], ‘the significance of lies will vary from case to case’; -in the UK context, use of such a structured approach must take place within the framework of EU law governing credibility assessment, Article 4 of the Qualification Directive in particular; and, -also in the context of UK law, decision-makers (including judges) by s. 8 of the Asylum and Immigration (Treatment of Claimants, etc.) Act 2004 are statutorily obliged to consider certain types of behaviour as damaging to credibility. 3. Consideration of credibility in light of such indicators, if approached subject to the aforementioned caveats, is a valid and useful exercise, based squarely on existing learning.”.

Цитирую свой пост из соответствующего раздела Иммиграционных Новостей здесь, т.к. считаю, что эта информация важная : "18 December 2017 – Helpful and just interesting Immigration News from the Immigration Lawyers who can really help - www.legalcentre.org – Ph/Viber/WhatApp : 07791145923 Неработающие партнеры-европейы (EU citizens), кто находятся в браке с гражданами Великобритании (UK), так же могут получить ПМЖ (Settlement - ILR) в Великобритании >>> It is still possible to apply for Settlement for the EU citizens who did not work and are married to British citizen spouses Are you an EEA national, who has never or very little worked in the UK and you have been married to a UK citizen spouse for some 10 or more years ? In this case you can benefit from the provisions of the current Immigration Rules, namely, the para 276B, and you may be issued with a Settlement status in the UK under the UK (rather the the EEA Regulations) Immigration Rules"

18 December 2017 – Helpful and just interesting Immigration News from the Immigration Lawyers who can really help - www.legalcentre.org – Ph/Viber/WhatApp : 07791145923 Неработающие партнеры-европейы (EU citizens), кто находятся в браке с гражданами Великобритании (UK), так же могут получить ПМЖ (Settlement - ILR) в Великобритании >>> It is still possible to apply for Settlement for the EU citizens who did not work and are married to British citizen spouses Are you an EEA national, who has never or very little worked in the UK and you have been married to a UK citizen spouse for some 10 or more years ? In this case you can benefit from the provisions of the current Immigration Rules, namely, the para 276B, and you may be issued with a Settlement status in the UK under the UK (rather the the EEA Regulations) Immigration Rules

Приветствую, Итак : Я вот смотрю на их государственный сервис по проверке документов перед отправкой. В моем Вустершире он пока почему то заморожен и стоит Ј95. Хоть кто то им пользовался, кто отправлял по почте? Вроде как гарантирует проверку формы и необходимых доков и сами их отправляют - Вот тут многие и погорели на тысячи. Я уже много раз писал, что этот государственный сервис не имеет право проверять на правильность заполнения формы на основании приложенных документов, как это делаю я для форумчан и не только <noindex>здесь</noindex>, например. Вместо этого они ТОЛЬКО проверяют что все поля заполненны БЕЗ проверки документов. То есть, если что-то не так - они не могут это увидеть и, даже если бы увидели, они не имеют права давать совета, что и как поменять. То есть, кто-то придумал очень "классный" сервис - за £95 полистать анкету. То есть риск потратить зря Ј2300 минимизируется, и дешевле чем Ј590 за премиум сервис. Который я не уверена что потяну - Это не так, увы... Вопрос к Бритиш лоеру. Есть ли уже какая то информация о том, будут ли повышать цены на визы в следующем году? И если да, то на сколько? Обычно публикуется информация о ценах в конце января. А цены начинают действовать с начала нового налогового года ( начала апреля). Я как раз попадаю на после 6 апреля 2018. Если опять поднимут на 25% ИЛР буду ну очень расстроена - Цены обычно повышают после 6-го апреля. Других данных пока нет. Кстати, кто нибудь оспаривает уже в судебном порядке эту цену? Вы ведь писали что она превышает себестоимость визы в 10 раз. Вряд ли иммигранты будут оспаривать, но может кто вынужден был? Или есть филантропы среди адвокатов? - Не оспаривают. Если просто - то это формальная и узаконенная монополия.

Да. Форма действительна : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...he-uk-form-setm</noindex> На прошлой неделе, используя эту же форму получал клиентке получить ILR после того, как "привез" ее 5 лет назад, т.е. Entry Clearance as a Spouse of a UK citizen, потом продление (FLR(M)), сейчас подавали на ILR (SET(M)). Как всегда в UK, подавали в личном визите <noindex>в нашем местном PEO</noindex>. Заявление рассмотрели за 4 минут, клиентка с мужем даже кофе не успели в кайе попить. Кстати, старую форуму можно использовать в течение 21 дня со дня выхода новой формы, при условии, что оплата будет произведена правильно (т.е. если И форма поменялась, И оплата).

Отличные новости. Всего Вам хорошего и добро пожаловать в Великобританию !

Приветствую, Обычно практически сразу же, или же в течение пары дней. Вчера очередная клиентка-форумчанка получила BRP, а сегодня пришли оригиналы документов из UK BA.

Ссылка для записи на консультацию со мной, чтобы Вы могли получить ответы на Ваши детальные вопросы.

15 December 2017 – Helpful and just interesting Immigration News from the Immigration Lawyers who can really help - www.legalcentre.org – Ph/Viber/WhatApp : 07791145923 >>> UK Visas and Immigration policy paper - Asylum claims in detention: policy equality statement (13 December 2017) : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...ality-statement</noindex> UK Visas and Immigration policy equality statement on processing asylum claims immigration detention. Asylum process guidance is available for cases in detention who have claimed asylum, and for entering cases who have claimed asylum into detention >>> UK Visas and Immigration Guidance: Misuse of rights and verification of EEA rights of residence (14 December 2017) : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...ts-of-residence</noindex> Guidance on how UK Visas and Immigration assess whether a person has misused an EEA right of residence in the UK >>> UK Visas and Immigration guidance: EEA decisions taken on grounds of public policy (14 December 2017) : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...f-public-policy</noindex> Guidance on how UK Visas and Immigration makes decisions on the grounds of public policy and public security

Приветствую, Как-то все смашалось. EEA2 отменили лет так 5 назад. Скорее всего, Вы подавали другую форму. Чтобы точно разобраться, нуно видеть отказ. Вот ссылка, как все в Вашей ситуации сделать правильно : <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html</noindex> Ваши цитаты из письма UK BA относятся к EU citizens. См. новости, которые я опубликовал сегодня - там есть детальная расшифровка, что и как и когда и в каком виде и для кого будет. Non-EEA могут (только Family Members) могут жить без виз, но тогда не смогут веруться в UK без соответствующей визы. Я на связи.

14 December 2017 – Helpful and just interesting Immigration News from the Immigration Lawyers who can really help - www.legalcentre.org – Ph/Viber/WhatApp : 07791145923 >>> EEA applications – notes from the recent UK BA and ILPA meeting New settled status/temporary status system for EEA national  The UK BA hopes to introduce new system in September 2018.  Likely to be introduced in stages – aiming to avoid everyone applying upon commencement of the scheme to be able to resource adequately.  Want to make system as straightforward as possible. Ideally will be entirely online – no need to send in identity document – scan it instead.  Presumption will be to grant some form of leave e.g. Leave to Remain or Indefinite Leave to Remain rather than refuse. Need to balance this against preventing fraud. Many people submit false applications claiming to be family member of EEA national as last-ditch attempt to avoid removal – so there will have to be fraud indicators which if triggered will lead to in-depth consideration.  The UK BA hopes that when the new system is introduced people will stop applying for PR docs etc under EU law – but they understand why ILPA members may advise people to do both. They want to try to reduce volumes of applications under current system so they can cope with new system HMRC data sharing – EEA application (from the recent UK BA and ILPA meeting) Two kinds of data sharing with HMRC: Bulk data sharing – every month the UK BA requests HMRC data on all EEA sponsors of new EEA applicants (residence cards). Takes time to get it but that way the data is ready by the time the applicant is considered by caseworkers. Aim is just to check that the EEA national is working right now. Not done for PR applicants. Manual (one-off) data sharing – done on case-by-case basis, e.g. retained rights case where applicant can’t provide evidence of EEA national’s activities. If no tax/incorrect tax paid but there is satisfactory evidence of employment/self-employment they won’t refuse the application – but they will refer it to HMRC. Currently there is a cap on just how much data can be shared by HMRC. With the new settled status scheme there are agreements in place to share much more data with a variety of other government departments. On-line forms – EEA applications  The UK would like to extend it to all applicants but can’t afford to do this yet. Current priority for online team is introducing online settlement form.  Meanwhile family members applying separately cannot use the online form. Their application will be rejected if they try to do this.  But students/self-sufficient people financially responsible for family members (or supported by family members) can use the online form at their own risk. They need to be careful because it doesn’t prompt them to provide all the information needed. The NEW EEA paper form New draft version is with Home Office lawyers for review. New version won’t ask for all absences from UK – in line with online form. Return of documents  ROD requests now processed within 48 hours. EEA family permits  Some decisions made in Sheffield at the moment.  Liverpool are helping out with EEA family permit applications made in Indian subcontinent. They are able to assist making EEA family permit decisions because this is their specialist area. Applications missing EEA national’s identity document  There have to be extremely good reasons not to enclose EEA national’s identity document. Retained rights, domestic violence cases where applicant can’t get hold of document should not be rejected because of failure to provide it. ILPA members pointed out that they are being rejected (or sometimes refused) on this ground. The UK BA will look into it. Option to accept residence card if PR is going to be refused  Current policy – if someone has applied for a PR card and caseworker considers that they don’t have enough evidence for this but may qualify for residence card caseworker will try to contact applicant or representative once to ask if they would like to vary their application from PR to residence card. If caseworker can’t get through or if the person says no the application will be refused.  If applicant or representative says in covering letter that they would like to be considered for residence card if Home Office considers that they don’t have enough evidence for PR then they will act on this. But be aware that if you follow this option then there will be no right of appeal if you say this and you get a residence card instead of PR card.  New draft version of paper PR form will have box to tick to say you want to be considered for residence card if not enough evidence for PR card – this is with the Home Office lawyers at the moment.

Из недавних заявлений клиентов: Почтовые заявлния (UK и за рубежем для приезда в UK): - Representative of Overseas Company — Dependent – заявлени из-за руежа (т. е. присоедениться к спонсору, кто уже был в UK) : 12 недель - EEA(PR) — Non-EEA – 2 месяца 1 неделя - AN (EU) – 2 месяца 2 недели - MN1 (EU и non-EEA) – 2 месяца Личный визит в отделение UK BA где заявления рассматриваются в день подачи : -FLR(M) – переход со студенческой визы — 2.5 часа -FLR(M) – пррдление 2 часа -SET(O) – после Tier 2 (General) – 2.5 часа -SET(M) – супруг британки — 2 часа

Приветствую, ILR - разные бывают. Укажите точо название формы.

Отличные новости поздравлю, и с Наступающими !

13 December 2017 – Helpful and just interesting Immigration News from the Immigration Lawyers who can really help - www.legalcentre.org – Ph/Viber/WhatApp : 07791145923 >>> Australian supreme court considers British Overseas Citizenship basically worthless : <noindex>https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/...A//2017/45.html</noindex> “To observe that British overseas citizenship is a juridical relationship between the individual and the United Kingdom, as Mr Fransman describes it, is not to conclude that it is a relationship which for the purposes of s 44(i) renders the BOC a citizen of a foreign power. No party contended that the fact that the foreign power designates a status as that of “citizen” is determinative without consideration of the rights, privileges and obligations conferred under the law of the foreign power. The status of BOC distinctly does not confer the rights or privileges of a citizen as that term is generally understood: a BOC does not have the right to enter or reside in the United Kingdom. Critically, taking into account the purpose of s 44(i), which is to ensure that members of the Parliament do not have split allegiance, it does not appear that Senator Xenophon’s status as a BOC entailed any reciprocal obligation of allegiance to the United Kingdom per se or to Her Majesty the Queen in right of the United Kingdom”. >>> People accused of TOEIC cheating have in-country right of challenge : <noindex>http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2017/2009.html</noindex> The Court of Appeal has held in Ahsan v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Rev 1) [2017] EWCA Civ 2009 that people accused of cheating on the TOEIC English language test and threatened with removal from the UK have the right to challenge that decision in this country rather than from abroad. >>> Being able to demonstrate “a genuine and subsisting parental relationship” with a qualifying child is an essential requirement to succeed in a human rights appeal involving children : <noindex>http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2017/1967.html</noindex> In Secretary of State for the Home Department v VC (Sri Lanka) [2017] EWCA Civ 1967 the Court of Appeal grappled with what this means in the pretty extreme case of the respondent’s children being in care. >>>Updated Guidance - Status of EU citizens in the UK: what you need to know (8 December 2017) : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/guidance/status-of-eu-na...ou-need-to-know</noindex> >>>Example case studies: EU citizens' rights in the UK (8 December 2017) : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/case-studies/...ights-in-the-uk</noindex> >>>Communication from the Commission to the European Council (Article 50) on the state of progress of the negotiations with the United Kingdom under Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union (8 December 2017) : <noindex>https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-...mmunication.pdf</noindex> >>>Joint report from the negotiators of the European Union and the United Kingdom Government on progress during phase 1 of negotiations under Article 50 TEU on the United Kingdom's orderly withdrawal from the European Union (8 December 2017) : <noindex>https://ec.europa.eu/commission/files/joint...ropean-union_en</noindex> >>>Comparison of EU/UK Positions on Citizens' Rights - December 2017 : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/syste...ens__rights.pdf</noindex>

Пожалуйста. Рад был помочь.

+1............ Так же по Правилам нужно подавать ВСЕ паспорта, которые использовались для нахождения/въезда в UK

Приветствую, Итак : Добрый день! Я собираюсь подаваться на PR (non-EEA family member). У мужа (EEA) уже есть PR (получено в начале 2017г). Мои 5 лет резиденства наступили 10 декабря 2017. Я немного запуталась в документах. 1) Нужно ли мне отправлять все пейслипы мужа за все 5 лет, или достаточно PR + payslips за 2017 год? - PR+ payslips c даты получения PR 2) Наше свидетельство о браке переведено в Украине и заверено нотариусом там же. Я его уже отправляла в ХО при подаче на residence card (вопросов не было). Теперь же требуют контакты переводчика (чего в моем переводе нет). Насколько это критично для принятия решения, и могу ли я указать контакты в сопроводительном письме? - Так может не пройти. Я могу заверить перевод Вашего переводчика (у меня уровень MCIL) за £27, включая мою декларацию и отсылку оригинала декларации Вам.

12 December 2017 – Helpful and just interesting Immigration News from the Immigration Lawyers who can really help - www.legalcentre.org – Ph/Viber/WhatApp : 07791145923 Расшифровка изменений в Правилах. Важное выделено красным цветом. >>> New statement of changes to the Immigration Rules: HC309 – Clarification of some important points : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...7-december-2017</noindex> This is an in-depth look at our previous report from the 7th December 2017 on the new statemented of changes to the Immigration Rules HC 309. The most important points are, as follows : Except where otherwise indicated, these changes will come into force on 11 January 2018, although applications made before 11 January 2018 will be decided in accordance with the Immigration Rules in force on 10 January 2018. - 10 year ban expanded A ten-year ban on re-entry is introduced for those who used deception in an application for “leave to enter or remain, or in order to obtain documents from the Secretary of State or a third party required in support of the application”. It used to be that a ten-year ban was imposed on those who used deception in an application for entry clearance only. Family members applying under Appendix FM of the Immigration Rules are still NOT subject to this ban. - Absences for PBS dependants are now limited to 180 days in line with the main applicants This might be one of the changes with the most profound impact. It used to be the case that while PBS migrants had to have been out of the UK for fewer than 180 days in any given 12 months during the qualifying period for Indefinite Leave to Remain, dependants did not have to meet this requirement. As a result, PBS migrants, in particular Tier 1 (investors) and (entrepreneur), have historically ensured that the main applicant in the application was the one who did not need to travel that much, while the “real” businessperson was a dependant, allowing them to travel extensively, usually for business, and still be eligible for Indefinite Leave to Remain. The 180-day absence criterion is now extended to partners of PBS migrants as well, so that the strategy above will no longer work. This will be apply to those granted leave following an application made after 11 January 2018. - Electronic entry clearance Entry Clearance may now be issued electronically. This scheme will be trialed with specific groups (not yet announced) to start with, with a view to general introduction later. Applicants who hold an entry clearance issued in electronic form will not need to present it to an Immigration Officer, who will instead be able to check it electronically. They will only need to present their passport or identity documents. These changes will take effect on 11 January 2018 but the UK BA has not yet confirmed know who would be the first groups to have entry clearance issued electronically. - Visitors To date, those visitors who held a standard or marriage/civil partnership visit visa would have needed to obtain a separate transit visa if they want to transit the UK. From 11 January 2018, they will be allowed to transit the UK without the need to obtain a separate transit visa. Appendix 3 is also being changed to clarify that visitors are not permitted to study at an academy or a school maintained by a Local Authority. - Immigration bail This is the one change which does not have a commencement date. The government simply proposes to commence Schedule 10 to the Immigration Act 2016 “as soon as possible”. Schedule 10 introduces a new concept of immigration bail and transfers those on temporary admission or release onto that new status. In summary, temporary admission and temporary release will no longer exist, and will be replaced by “bail” instead. Once the changes come into force, those who have no prospects of being removed and therefore cannot be detained may still be put on bail. - Tier 1 (Exceptional Talent) The changes fulfill the commitments made in the recent Budget to: double the number of Tier 1 (Exceptional Talent) visas from 1,000 to 2,000. Applicants must be endorsed by a Designated Competent Body (DCB), but the additional 1,000 places will not be allocated between the DCBs. They will instead form a pool of unallocated places which will be drawn on according to need on a first-come first-served basis. allow exceptional talent visa holders (but not exceptional promise visa holders) to qualify for ILR after three years, simplify the application for holders of certain peer-reviewed fellowships or senior academic positions. - Tier 1 (Entrepreneur) The requirements for Tier 1 (Entrepreneur) have been re-written “to make them clearer and easier to follow”. The requirements themselves are “unchanged”, but for 14 separately listed changes (!). These changes include: <clarification on the job creation rules, <clarification on certain documentary evidence to be provided investments from venture capital firms (which will now need to provide a letter); <applicants will no longer be able to rely on investments and funds already relied on by another Tier 1 (Entrepreneur) or that migrant’s business or close family member. These investments and funds can no longer be relied on to “prevent recycling of funds between applicants”. <clarifications to the evidential requirements for those switching from Tier 1 (General) to Tier 1 (Entrepreneur) category - Tier 2 This category is also seeing a number of changes, but the most significant ones are: <applicants switching from Tier 4 to Tier 2 (General) will be able to apply as soon as they have completed their courses, rather than only after having received their final results <The introducing of further exemptions to the Resident Labour Market Test for posts held by researcher applicants who are recipients of supernumerary research Awards and Fellowships, and established research team members sponsored by a Higher Education Institution or a Research Council Perhaps more significantly, paragraph 245AAA( is deleted. This paragraph read: “the applicant must have been employed in the UK continuously throughout the five years, under the terms of their Certificate of Sponsorship, work permit or in the employment for which they were given leave to enter or remain, except that any breaks in employment in which they applied for leave as a Tier 2 Migrant, or, under Tier 5 Temporary Worker (International Agreement) Migrant as a private servant in a diplomatic household, where in the latter case they applied to enter the UK before 6 April 2012, to work for a new employer shall be disregarded, provided this is within 60 days of the end of their employment with their previous employer or Sponsor”. It meant that those who had a break of more than 60 days between one employment and the other could not apply for Indefinite Leave to Remain after five years. One could instead apply to renew their leave, but the maximum period of leave under Tier 2 (General) is capped at a maximum of six years. In other words, applicants who had a break of more than 60 days between one employment and the other had to leave the UK after six years, and were never given a chance to apply for Indefinite Leave to Remain. This change is great news for these applicants. - Students The changes will allow some part-time students to secure Tier 4 visas. Tier 4 part-time students will not have work rights, will not be able to bring dependants and will not be able to extend in-country. Part 3 of the Rules is amended so that the minimum age for those coming for short term study is 16 instead of 18. - Other changes The wording on relationships for family members of PBS migrants and migrants in other work categories set out in Part 5 of the Rules is changed from being in a “subsisting relationship” to being in a “genuine and subsisting relationship”, bringing the wording in line with those applying under Appendix FM. The minimum age for overseas domestic workers is raised from 18 to 19. Measures are also introduced to prevent overseas diplomats bringing extended family members to the UK in the guise of domestic workers. The annual quota of places available under the Tier 5 (Youth Mobility Scheme) has been updated.

Получил. Делаю.

Приветствую, "Нет, не нарушение". Рад был помочь.

Понятно. Обсудить все вопросы можете со мной здесь : <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html</noindex>

Приветствую, Solar Accounts, как вариант : <noindex>https://www.solaraccounts.co.uk/</noindex>