British Lawyer

Вчера провел детальную срочную консультацию и сегодня в PEO клиентке дали продление по стандартной процедуре, т.е. на ILR через 2.5 года а не через 10 лет.

Приветствую, Чтобы Вы не делали, UK BA будет всегда использовать ТОЛЬКО ту фамалию, которая указана у Вас в загранпаспорте. Лучше все сделать правильно и вовремя.

Формально - нет, разумеется (действителен ли паспорт). По поводу въезда - 50/50.

Приветствую, Если Вы хотели получить продление как жена британца, т.е. по стандартному пути, анкета FLR(M). Если Вы оформили неправильный appointment и "хотите" по явной причине (не проходите по правилам по 5-и летнему сроку) увеличить срок на ПМЖ на 10 лет - форма FLR(FP). Вы выбрали неправильную категорию. Я здесь, если нужна помощь разобраться что и как нужно сделать, чтобы не "наломать дров" и получить правильное продление и потом ПМЖ в желаемый срок, а не через 10 лет: <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html</noindex>

05 January 2018 – Helpful and just interesting Immigration News from the Immigration Lawyers who can really help - www.legalcentre.org – Mob/Viber/WhatsApp : +44(0)7791145923 >>> Calculating a Settlement date – from the date of entry clearance was issued from the date the applicant entered the UK ? The period between the issue of entry clearance and entering the UK : <noindex>https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j...Lgw8gcaI-8YnTFB</noindex> The period between entry clearance being issued and the applicant entering the UK may be counted toward the qualifying period. Any absences between the date of issue and entry to the UK are considered an allowable absence. This period will count towards the 180 days allowable absence in the relevant 12 month period. The applicant does not need to provide evidence to demonstrate the reason for delayed entry. If the delay is more than 180 days, the applicant can only include time after the applicant entered the UK in the continuous period calculation. >>> Correspondence from HM Courts and Tribunals Service re First-tier Immigration Bail: Immigration Act 2016 (4 January 2018) : <noindex>http://legalcentre.org//files/IA2016-Stake...etter-final.pdf</noindex> “First-tier Tribunal Immigration Bail: Immigration Act 2016 Schedule 10 to the Immigration Act 2016 comes into force on Monday 15 January 2018. It will make changes to the way in which immigration bail is managed by both the Secretary of State for the Home Department (SSHD) and the First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber). This letter is to update you on the main changes relating to the First-tier Tribunal.  The current distinction between bail processes in Scotland and the rest of the UK will be removed; with procedures and terminology in use in England, Wales and Northern Ireland applying in Scotland. The terms ‘Bail Bonds’, ‘Recognizance’ and ‘Caution’ will all become known as ‘Financial Conditions’. Financial Conditions will only be payable when bail conditions are not complied with and a Judge has decided an amount is due following a ‘Payment Liability Hearing’ (rather than a Forfeiture Hearing), so it will no longer be possible to take a deposit of bail money in Scotland as a condition of granting bail. Anyone with funds currently lodged with the Tribunal will be entitled to receive a full refund on agreeing to an equivalent Financial Condition and will be contacted by the Glasgow hearing centre.  Where the Tribunal orders that a Financial Condition be paid because of the breach of bail conditions, this can be done in person at a bank or by use of BACS – there will not be the ability to attend a court to make the payment as currently. In the event of non-payment, in England and Wales enforcement of Financial Conditions will move from magistrates’ courts to the county court. In Scotland it will be enforced by the sheriff court, and in Northern Ireland by a county court.  Where a person has been in immigration detention for a period of more than four months a new duty is to be placed on the SSHD to refer the matter to the Tribunal for a decision on whether bail should be granted. This will not apply where the detainee gives written notice that they do not wish their case to be referred. Where a reference is made, it is to be treated as if it were an application for bail.  Once it has granted bail, it will be possible for the Tribunal to direct that the SSHD may exercise power to amend or remove conditions of bail, or to impose new conditions. This means in effect that the Tribunal will be able to ‘transfer’ the management of bail to the Home Office. This will be highlighted on a revised version of the B1 Bail Application Form (see below) and the Tribunal will make any intention to do so clear at the bail hearing, so that the parties may make representations if they wish. This will be particularly important in the first few days of commencement when the current version of the B1 Application Forms may still be before the Tribunal. Amendments reflecting these changes will be made to the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Rules 2014, the Judicial Bail Guidance and to bail forms and notices which will be used across the UK. Revised versions of the B1 Bail Application Form will be available for download from Formfinder (https://hmctsformfinder.justice.gov.uk/) on 12 January 2018. There will also be a new B2 Bail Variation application form for use where a person who is on Tribunal bail would like to change the conditions. If the Home Office wish to apply to the Tribunal to vary the conditions of bail they will use a B3 Application form. Where an email address has been provided by yourselves on either the B1 or B2 forms bail decisions, where possible and when appropriate, will be served electronically rather than in hard copy. HMCTS Immigration and Asylum Jurisdictional Support Team”

Это очень относительная таблица, тем более в ней есть уровень B. Я здесь, если Вы запутались : <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html</noindex>

Приветствую, Мои ресурсы на форуме ограничены, жду Вас на консультацию по всем детальным вопросам, как делаю другие форумчане : <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html</noindex>

Добрый день, Рад был помочь.

04 January 2018 – Helpful and just interesting Immigration News from the Immigration Lawyers who can really help - www.legalcentre.org – Mob/Viber/WhatsApp : +44(0)7791145923 >>> Home Office and Immigration Enforcement Guidance: Managing detainees' money over £1000 : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...-exceeding-1000</noindex> The revised DSO 05/2011 ‘Management of detainees’ cash exceeding the value of £1000, the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA) and the referral process’. Now available via the above link. The new iteration of this guidance contains updates to the referral process and to the on-call structure of the Intelligence and Financial Investigation teams.

NCS работает только с простыми заявлениями, и то не всегда эффективно. Форум содержит десятки сообщений о том, как NCS приняли заявления, а потом люди получили отказы. Я какждый месяц встречаю такие ситуации. Вот сегодня будет консультацию вечером с человеком, который "подарил" £1282 UK BA после подачи заявления через NCS. NCS просто проверяет заполняемость полей и заверяет оригиналы. NHC не может и не имеет права делать глубокую проверки или даже задавать уточняющие вопросы/давать совет.

Приветствую, Нет, не пройдете. Нузший уровень - A1...Для ILR - B1.

Приветствую, Сейчас в UK BA c клиенткой - получаем ILR (жена британца) в личном визите, ждем решение. То есть не могу посмотреть форму, но могу ответить на другой вопрос - я обычно прикладываю свидетельства о разводе.

Приветствую, В контексте Вашего вопроса - отсчитайте 4 года 11 месяцев с даты въезда по визе жены = самая ранняя дата подачи на ILR, если не было других обстоятельст, по которым можно подать раньше.

+1.................

03 January 2018 – Helpful and just interesting Immigration News from the Immigration Lawyers who can really help - www.legalcentre.org – Mob/Viber/WhatsApp : +44(0)7791145923 >>> Watch out for the approved IELTS tests centres ! The 6th April 2015 was the date from which ALL test taken on or after that date, needed to be from a test centre approved by the Secretary of State as a Secure English Language Test Centre. See Appendix FM 1.21 Guidance at paragraph 2.2.2: <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/syste...ection_1.21.pdf</noindex> The Guidance therein applies generally and not just to Appendix FM applications. The types of test which are approved are set out in Appendix O <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/guidance/immigration-rul...-language-tests</noindex> >>> What is coming up in relation to the UK and EEA law immigration in 2018 in the UK ? Please note that this is a general attempt to predict the possible events that may or may not happen (thanks to the FMO) Immigration White Paper The contents of the White Paper are entirely unknown at the time of writing but are expected to address future EU migration and perhaps migration policy more generally. The fact that a major MAC report on future immigration is not expected until September 2018 suggests the White Paper may not be comprehensive when it does eventually arrive (see below). Second phase EU-UK talks With sufficient progress having been made, the second phase of EU-UK talks on future relationship will begin in early 2018, including on a transitional phase that is likely to preserve most or all elements of the single market and free movement of people. European Union (Withdrawal) Bill Formerly known as the “Great Repeal Bill” but also referred to in some quarters as the “Great Download and Save Bill” this is the main legislative measure bringing about Brexit. In short it: Repeals the European Communities Act 1972 Directly incorporates into UK law some EU legislation Imparts extensive powers to the Government to make secondary legislation relevant to Brexit It is unknown when the Bill will become law but it is likely in early 2018. Immigration Bill This is anticipated to be a very short Bill subjecting EEA nationals to UK immigration law and formally repealing the Immigration (Economic Area) Regulations 2016. There may be some potential to propose amendments and it can act as a focus for discussion. Despite (or because of) immigration being an enormous and controversial subject, the Government already commands extensive powers to regulate immigration policy and law without primary legislation. Migration Advisory Committee report on economic migration The Migration Advisory Committee (MAC) is an official advisory body appointed by the Government to advise on immigration issues. MAC was commissioned in July 2017 to consider the position of EEA nationals in the UK labour market. The consultation formally closed in October 2017 and the final report is due September 2018. Law Commission review of Immigration Rules This exercise is confined to re-writing the law of immigration rather than the policy. However, the Law Commission is a genuinely independent (if conservative) body, consults widely and is already seeking assistance with its task. Simplification of immigration law is extremely desirable in order to improve accessibility. Target for completion of UK withdrawal talks The EU has set a target of Autumn 2018 for conclusion of withdrawal talks. This would in theory give sufficient time for all Member States to approve the deal, as is required by Article 50 TFEU (which governs withdrawal).

Приветствую, Правило 5 лет до ILR распостраняется на всех в контексте Вашего вопроса. Ей нужно будет продлять визу. В конце декабря так продлил одной из клиенток, точнее ее дочери, визу.

Приветствую, У Вас детальные вопросы, которые я рекомендую обсудить здесь : <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html</noindex> В общих чертах : 1. Нужно ли отправлять паспорт мужа -европейца или можно отправить только копию? - Если Вы подаете по Правилу 5 лет - обычно не нужно . 2.Тринити колледж тест. Спрашивают SELT unique electronic reference number. Что это за номер на сертификате? Здесь три номера: Qualification, UER очень большой, в форму не влезает) and candidate number - Возможно у Вас устаревший тест. Номер обычно действительно длинный. Вообще этот номер высылается провайдером теста после экзамена. .. 3. В п.6 Biometric enrolment это все речь идет о Permanent resident card? - Когда в последний раз сдавали биометрику 4. Надо ли посылать Permanent resident card вместе с документами? - Да. Хотя я обычно заверяю копии документов клиентов и не посылаю оригиналы в UK BA. 5. Если мне не вернут документы до мая, смогу ли я отозвать свой паспорт для выезда из ЮК в отпуск? - 50 на 50. См. выше. Хотя если сейчас подадите и все правильно после консультации по ссылку выше сделаете - скорее всего получите решение до мая.

Пожалуйста : <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html</noindex>

28 December 2017 – Helpful and just interesting Immigration News from the Immigration Lawyers who can really help - www.legalcentre.org – Ph/Viber/WhatsApp : +44(0)7791145923 Особо важное выделено красным цветом >>> Self-employed EU citizens who fall out of work retain worker status : <noindex>http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/docu...&cid=345993</noindex> When a self-employed EU citizen falls on hard times in another member state and stops working, do they retain their status as a worker? Since 2010, English courts have said they do not. In a case with wide implications for residence and social security rights, the Court of Justice of the European Union in C-442/16 Florea Gusa v Minster for Social Protection (Ireland) has deemed that position to be wrong. Following Gusa, self-employed EU citizens who become unemployed retain their worker status, and therefore right to reside, in the same way as people in direct employment who lose their jobs. >>> Supreme Court boost for people stripped of their British citizenship : <noindex>http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2017/82.html</noindex> A Supreme Court decision handed down recently is good news for people who have had their British citizenship taken away because it was obtained under false pretenses. The Home Office has accepted that in most cases, deprivation rather than nullity is the correct process. Deprivation gives people stripped of citizenship a full right of appeal and has less of a knock-on effect on their families if carried through. That means that the third parties (spouses and children) are not affected by the deprivation decision whereas they would be in the case of nullity. The worst affected are usually children. >>> New code of practice on freezing immigrants’ bank accounts : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...counts-measures</noindex> The Home Office published a guidance for caseworkers on when to apply for a court order freezing the bank account of someone alleged to be in the UK unlawfully. A freezing order under section 40C(2) of the Immigration Act 2014 “prohibits each person and body by or for whom the account is operated from making withdrawals or payments from the account”. The measure was introduced by Schedule 7 of the Immigration Act 2016, as part of the hostile environment package of restrictions aimed at making life intolerable for people without immigration status. The banks are expected to carry out the first round of immigration checks on some 70 million accounts in January 2018.

Приветствую, См. определение "qualified EEA national" (=Вы) в Immigration (EEA) Regulations 2016.

Не рекомнедую.

Приветствую, Если Вы хотите разобраться самостоятельно, вот ссылка на первоисточник : <noindex>https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j...FixuHO3PfwilNdr</noindex> См. секцию 8.2. Сумма та же - не менее £18 600.

+1.............. Она легко отделалась. Могли просто отказать...

+1................ Автор, я на связи здесь : <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html</noindex>

27 December 2017 – Helpful and just interesting Immigration News from the Immigration Lawyers who can really help - www.legalcentre.org – Ph/Viber/WhatsApp : +44(0)7791145923 Важное выделено красным цветом >>> Statement of Changes HC 309 - Residence Requirements for PBS Dependants UPDATED with Home Office response (22 December 2017) “We are making a few changes to settlement rules as part of this rules change. Collectively, these are intended to remove inconsistencies and provide greater clarity for PBS migrants and their dependants on the circumstances in which they may apply and be granted indefinite leave to remain and to ensure that migrants act in a way that is consistent with the spirit of the Immigration Rules. In addition, we included this change at the same time as some of our wider changes to settlement rules for the purposes of coherence. You will be aware that the policy change in relation to PBS dependants has been planned for over a year. However, in that time, we have considered this further and have taken great care to address the concerns raised. That is why the rules change will not apply retrospectively – we will only consider absences in any future grants of leave. We consider this to be reasonable and applicants will be aware that the Immigration Rules are subject to change and that they should not assume that the rules will necessarily be the same in 5 years’ time. We are aware that some Tier 1 (Investor) applicants structure their affairs as you have described. However, our general position is that those applying for ILR should have built up substantial ties to the UK, including having lived the majority of their time here. Allowing absences of up to 180 days a year is a very generous provision which allows applicants to continue their business affairs overseas while building ties to the UK. We see no reason not to apply the same requirement to dependant partners as well as to main applicants. In applying for leave, they are declaring an intention to live with their partner in the UK. The child dependant rules also require both parents to be in the UK, or be granted at the same time. We would question what the purpose would be of granting such leave to dependants if the real intention was for the partner/other parent to live apart from their family for the majority of the time. Such activities clearly go against the intention of the rules and may be considered to be a change of circumstances under paragraph 321(ii) or a false declaration under paragraph 321A(2) of the rules. Some PBS dependant partners have been refused re-entry for this very reason. Quantifying in the rules that they may spend up to 180 days a year overseas removes this uncertainty. With regard to the notice of this change, applicants have the remainder of their existing leave before any absences from the UK will be counted. As the absence provision is up to 180 days a year, they would also be able to have substantial absences from the UK in the early part of their future extension leave, before any such absences reached a level that would affect a future application for settlement. There is also no limit on the number of times an applicant may extend their leave as a PBS dependant. If any partners are unable to qualify for settlement, it is open to them to apply for further extensions and settle in future. The same applies to child dependants.”. >>> Sole Representative of an Overseas Business – the UK holding company possibility ? According to the UK BA, the creation of the UK holding company (instead of the subsidiary or branch) may be possible : “Application for overseas business representatives must ensure that they demonstrate that the company or companies they set up are engaged in the same core business activities as their parent company. Broadly speaking once in the UK business representatives can set up multiple subsidiaries and a holding company would not necessarily be excluded from this but it will be important that the applicant provides in the application a clear explanation of why the applicant has adopted the company structure that the applicant has chosen and how the applicant believes it meets the expectation that companies engage in the same business activities as their parent company.”. >>> Upper Tribunal Determination re Tier 1 Entrepreneurs (23 November 2017) : Recent determination from the Upper Tribunal. It relates to a Tier One Entrepreneur application, made with reference to the Article 8 ECHR, whose appeal was considered under the 2014 Immigration Act. The essence of the submission was that where the Immigration Rules were met, then any removal would breach Article 8 of the ECHR. At paragraph 40, the Tribunal adopted the Home Office’s concession that where the Immigration Rules are met, then the public interest in removal had nominal weight under question 4 of Razgar. >>> Update documents re EU citizens' rights (22 December 2017) - Status of EU citizens in the UK: what you need to know : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/guidance/status-of-eu-na...ou-need-to-know</noindex> - Home Secretary's open letter to EU citizens in the UK : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/news/home-sec...izens-in-the-uk</noindex> - UK leaving the EU: what you need to know : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/u...ou-need-to-know</noindex> >>> Home Office and Immigration Enforcement Guidance - Managing detainees' money over £1000 (21 December 2017) : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...-exceeding-1000</noindex> Detention services order 5/2011 about managing detainees' money over £1000.