British Lawyer

Очень интересная подача заявлений клиентов в нашем местном PEO сегодня - подавали на продление, получили ПМЖ за 40 минут : http://forum.chemodan.ua/index.php?s=&...t&p=1178293

Из заявлений форумчан на этой неделе, одобренных в личном визите со мной в нашем местном PEO Birmingham : Один из талончиков из PEO уникален - подавали на продление по категории PBS Dependent (очень нестандартная ситуация), но я также подготовил заявление на ILR. Перед подачей я поговорил с нашим case-worker и попросил его рассмотреть заявление на ILR, а не на продление. Отправил клиентов пить кофе. Через 40 (!) минут на мой мобильный номер позвонил наш case-worker и сказал, что клиенту дали ILR и уточнил, когда я приду за документами. Делюсь опытом и, да что тут скрывать - радостью, т.к. съкономил клиенту время и несколько тысяч фунтов (по "стандартным" правилам выходило + 1 проделние в будущем еще).

27 February 2018 – Read the reviews about our assistance to immigrants and their families like your here: <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/reviews.php</noindex> And as usual, the useful and just interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre - www.legalcentre.org – Mob : +44(0)7791145923 >>> The number of endorsements on the Tier 1 Exceptional Talent has doubled >>> The switching from Tier 4 to Tier 2 is now possible after completion of the course rather than the graduation >>> The NHS Surcharge will be increased from £200 (£150) to £400 (£300). No clear date has been announced by the UK BA. >>> The Immigration White Paper has been delayed until October 2018. >>> Have you got the Indefinite Leave to Enter (ILE) sticker in your passports ? You may need to change it for the plastic Settlement BRP card Despite the ILR being the equivalent to ILR, the ILE holders now need to satisfy the new employers and obtain the new Settlement BRP ID card >>> Have you got a pending immigration appeal, which you intend to withdraw and lodged a fresh immigration application via the same day premium service application ? If it is the case, note that the “S.3C(4) of the Immigration Act 1971 prohibits an application for leave to remain that is made on the same day as, and even if said to be simultaneous with, the applicant’s withdrawal of his appeal before the First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber). “ See <noindex>http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/IAC/2015/273.html</noindex>

Приветствую, Рад был помочь. Всего Вам хорошего.

Пожалуйста. Рад был помочь.

+1...................

26 February 2018 – Read the reviews about our assistance to immigrants and their families like your here: <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/reviews.php</noindex> And as usual, the useful and just interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre - www.legalcentre.org – Mob : +44(0)7791145923 >>> EU residents rush for British citizenship : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/im...o-december-2017</noindex> EU citizens already living in the UK are opting for British citizenship at record levels this morning’s quarterly immigration statistics from the Home Office and Office for National Statistics confirm.

Тогда это очень быстро, поздравляю !

Привет, Игорь, Согласен с тобой. У нас получается быстрее обычно, т.к. у нас есть британская лицензия на предоставление иммиграционных услуг в Великобритании и за рубежем (заявления на въезд в Великобританию) высшей категории, т.е. мы номер свой пишем в сопроводительных письмах и т.к, да и логотип соответствующий у нас везде стоит. Хотя один раз заявление клиента рассматривали дольше, чем у тебя, дней на 5, т.к. были праздники. Главное - положительный рузультат, если одной фразой. Спасибо за своевременную реакцию (см. ниже). Целый день был в UK BA с клиентами, продлял рабочую визу семье с Украины <noindex>в личном визите за 1 день в нашем местном отделении UK BA</noindex>.

Кому интересны сроки - последние несколько заявлений клиентов на натурализацию, поданных в начале января 2018 года, UK BA рассмотрел за 5 недель.

Привет, Игорь, Я исхожу из практики на территории UK и из тех заявлений, которые подаются за рубежем, в частности - в Украине. Тем более у меня есть очень высокий уровень и профессиональная регистрация в британском MCIL для заверения переводов клиентов. За пределами UK надежнее всего делать переводы в агенствах - тогда обычно не нужно заверение нотариуса. Лучший вариант - у провессионала человека в Великобритании, у которого есть регистрация в MCIL :-)

Приветствую, Отпечатки нужно будет сдавать заново.

Привет, Из заявлений форучан, что я подаю практически еженедельно - средний срок был 10 дней.

22 February 2018 – Read the reviews about our assistance to immigrants and their families like your here: <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/reviews.php</noindex> And as usual, the useful and just interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre - www.legalcentre.org – Mob : +44(0)7791145923 >>> WRS Registration and unregistered work – good news In light of the Court of Appeal decision in Gubeladze, ‘With immediate effect any unregistered work from 2009-11 will count towards the 5 years needed to acquire permanent residence’ and the UK BA it will update their guidance on this point in due course.”. Updated UK Visas and Immigration Guidance (21 February 2018) >>> UK Visas and Immigration - Points-based system: sponsor compliance visits (19 February 2018) : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...nsor-management</noindex> Guidance for staff on how to carry out sponsor visits before and after licences are issued >>> UK Visas and Immigration Guidance - Employer sponsorship: restricted certificate allocations (20 February 2018) : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...ate-allocations</noindex> A list of restricted certificates allocated each month for employer sponsorship in Tier 2 (General). >>> UK Visas and Immigration and Immigration Enforcement Guidance: Adults at Risk (20 February 2018): <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...nder-management</noindex> Guidance on immigration offender management for officers dealing with enforcement immigration matters within the UK

Из сегоднешней почты. Подавали в лично визите с клиентом на ILR на основании Tier 2 (General). До этого клиент подавал сам и получил отказ. В UK BA PEO (личный визит) небрежно отнеслись к заявлению клиента и перепутали т.н. Codes of Practice. Как пример, из врача сделали инженера. Заявление было не простое, т.к. клиент шел по т.н. переходному периоду, и ему не нужно было зарабатывать мин. £35 000 в год. Я подал на Административный Пересмотр, и ровно через 28 дней я получил уведомление из UK BA о том, что отказ отменили и что клиенту дали ILR. Вот как выглядит такое решение : Так же помогал одной форумчанке с ее заявление по гражданству. Заявление моей киентки как всегда рассмотрели быстро за несколько недель и я получил положительно решение но, увы, в самом сертификате была допущена ошибка в имени. Я помог клиентке и подал запрос на изменение имени в Сертификате о Натурализации. Через 7 недель я получл новый Сертификат о Натурализации с правильным именем. Вот как выглядит решение об изменении имени в Сертификате о Натурализации :

Приветствую. Только сканируются.

Приветствую : 1) Общий 2) Заполнять 3) Срок действия визы

Решение суда высшей инстанции - совету UK BA доверять нельзя ! Я публиковал это новость раньше, тем не менее, регулярно встречаю "наступающих на грабли" раз за разом". За последнюю неделю проверл около десятка консультаций по поводу отказов, полученных заявителями, кто доверил свою судьбу совету UK BA. Я много, много раз повторял, что совету UK BA доверять нельзя, т.к. те, кто отвечают на звонки иммигрантов зачастую дают неправильную информацию. В это трудно поверить обывателю, но я регулярно сталкиваюсь с завителями, кто вместо того, чтобу детально разобраться самому или, еще лучше, получить квалифицированный совет адвоката, ищет легкие пути. Другими словами - бесплатный сыр может быть только в мышеловке (с). Для тех, кто сомневается, до сих пор - см решение суда высшей инстранции, подтвердивший, что совету UK BA доверять нельзя. ТОЧКА : >>> Immigration applicants cannot rely on telephone calls with Home Office, the court says : <noindex>http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/IAC/2015/191.html</noindex> Immigration applicants cannot rely on telephone calls with Home Office operators, the Upper Tribunal has held in the case of R (on the application of Zia and Another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department IJR [2015] UKUT 191 (IAC). The application was a Tier 1 Entrepreneur application where the applicants’ bank refused to issue a letter that was required by Home Office rules. This meant that the application could not succeed under the Immigration Rules. The problem is not uncommon: civil servants at the Home Office have invented a number of requirements with which some banks are simply unwilling to comply. The applicants telephoned the Home Office several times to ask what to do. The calls must have been recorded as transcripts were presented to the tribunal. Conflicting advice had been given by different operators on different occasions. Anyone with experience of calling the Home Office helpline will be familiar with this problem. On the facts of the case the tribunal held that no legitimate expectation was created: the promise was either non existent or was ambiguous and the applicants had not disclosed earlier advice to the telephone operator who gave the “promise”. Upper Tribunal Judge Southern seems to go on, unnecessarily in the circumstances, to hold that legitimate expectation cannot override the requirements of the Immigration Rules. He finds that the telephone operator concerned, Wayne, did not have the authority to give any promise and continues: “Finally, there is a strong public interest in the outcome of such applications being decided in a consistent and predictable way, in line with the clear statement of policy as set out in the Immigration Rule applicable.” The suggestion that legitimate expectation basically does not exist in immigration cases is a controversial finding and should not necessarily be considered a bar in other cases. The facts of this case were very difficult for the applicants and legitimate expectation has been accepted in other cases.

20 February 2018 – Read the reviews about our assistance to immigrants and their families like your here: <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/reviews.php</noindex> And as usual, the useful and just interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre - www.legalcentre.org – Mob : +44(0)7791145923 Решение суда - нельзя (!!!) полагаться а совет UK BA по телефону; неприятные новости для граждан EU >>> Immigration applicants cannot rely on telephone calls with Home Office, the court says : <noindex>http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/IAC/2015/191.html</noindex> Immigration applicants cannot rely on telephone calls with Home Office operators, the Upper Tribunal has held in the case of R (on the application of Zia and Another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department IJR [2015] UKUT 191 (IAC). The application was a Tier 1 Entrepreneur application where the applicants’ bank refused to issue a letter that was required by Home Office rules. This meant that the application could not succeed under the Immigration Rules. The problem is not uncommon: civil servants at the Home Office have invented a number of requirements with which some banks are simply unwilling to comply. The applicants telephoned the Home Office several times to ask what to do. The calls must have been recorded as transcripts were presented to the tribunal. Conflicting advice had been given by different operators on different occasions. Anyone with experience of calling the Home Office helpline will be familiar with this problem. On the facts of the case the tribunal held that no legitimate expectation was created: the promise was either non existent or was ambiguous and the applicants had not disclosed earlier advice to the telephone operator who gave the “promise”. Upper Tribunal Judge Southern seems to go on, unnecessarily in the circumstances, to hold that legitimate expectation cannot override the requirements of the Immigration Rules. He finds that the telephone operator concerned, Wayne, did not have the authority to give any promise and continues: “Finally, there is a strong public interest in the outcome of such applications being decided in a consistent and predictable way, in line with the clear statement of policy as set out in the Immigration Rule applicable.” The suggestion that legitimate expectation basically does not exist in immigration cases is a controversial finding and should not necessarily be considered a bar in other cases. The facts of this case were very difficult for the applicants and legitimate expectation has been accepted in other cases. >>> The rights of EU nationals in the UK post-Brexit – the pessimistic prediction seems to emerge The UK government’s policy paper on EU citizens’ rights in the UK after Brexit, released in June 2017, offered reassurances about “safeguarding” rights, while leaving substantial question marks hanging — in particular about what kind of residence would be required to qualify for the new category of “settled status”. After the release of the government’s technical note in November 2017, and the joint report from the EU and UK negotiating teams the following month, it now seems that “residence” means residence in accordance with the conditions in Directive 2004/38/EC. That, in a broad sense, means that the so-called “simplified” process for the EU citizens after Brexit is unlikely to happen, that there likely to be the same requirements as currently are in the Regulations, meaning that a number of EU nationals may not be prepared and may meet the relevant requirements under the Rules after Brexit. The point ? Do it now, or it may be too late. We are here to help: www.legalcentre.org >>> Preservation of transitional provisions in relation to family members of dual nationals : <noindex>http://www.eearegulations.co.uk/Regs2016/ByPage/schedule_06</noindex> >>> Visa cap for skilled non-EU workers hit for third month running UK businesses seeking to hire skilled non-EU workers are losing out as it emerges that the monthly quota has been hit for an unprecedented third time in a row. A couple of days ago, the Home Office sent out hundreds of emails to UK businesses that have been waiting for the outcome of the February restricted certificate of sponsorship round. A restricted certificate of sponsorship is needed to support a visa application for most highly skilled non-EU workers coming to the UK. It’s not good news. For the third month in a row, and for only the fourth time since a quota was introduced in April 2011, the cap has been hit. This means that many highly skilled workers from outside the EU will be unable to take up their posts, at least until the number of applications starts to fall away (if they can hold out that long) or there is a change in the government’s approach. From the information the colleagues have been receiving, it is starting to look like the threshold for rejection could be around the Ј50K mark. Initially it was thought that December and January were just blips. Now it’s starting to feel like this could be a long-term issue. >>> MPs’ report scathing on Home Office capacity to cope with Brexit: <noindex>https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201...aff/421/421.pdf</noindex> The Home Affairs Committee of MPs today published its report on whether or not the Home Office has the capacity to deliver effective immigration services once the UK leaves the European Union next March. No, is the short answer. In addition, and in probably the least surprising aspect of a highly critical report, Brexit is unlikely to have a positive impact on the rest of the Home Office decision-making apparatus.

Пожалуйста, Рад был помочь.

Пожалуйста. Рад был помочь.

Да, именно так, Вы правильно поняли.

На прошлой неделе подавал 2 заявления форумчанок на ILR в личном визите - жены британцев. Анкеты SETM, £2297 + £590, подтверждаю. Одной заявительнице хотели отказать - caseworker не понимал особенности director of a specified company. Если бы не мое вмешательство (или заявление было бы подано по почте) - был бы отказ. Все получили ILR за 2.5 и 4 часа соответственно. Я на связи, подаю такие завлениея несколько раз в месяц. Есть вопросы - задавайте.

Приветствую. Сроки потихоньку (!) сокращаются, и то не всегда ! Нормальный Priority - это до 15 дней ! 40 дней - это не нормальный Priority...

19 February 2018 – Read the reviews about our assistance to immigrants and their families like your here: <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/reviews.php</noindex> And as usual, the useful and just interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre - www.legalcentre.org – Mob : +44(0)7791145923 >>> Who needs and who does not need to pass the English language test ? The following links clarifies who needs and who does not need to pass the English language test <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/english-language</noindex> >>> UK Spouse visa, the divorce and a new marriage in-country : one the applicant in this case will be able to apply for Settlement in the UK ? “A” came to the UK as a spouse of a British citizen and after few months they had issues and got divorced. After the divorce “A” married another British citizen and after the initial 30 months “A” applied for further leave to remain with the second husband and it was granted an extension for another 30 months. Under the current Rules and in the above circumstances “A” may NOT count the time for Settlement from the first spouse under the E-ILRP.1.4. : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/guidance/immigration-rul...-with-a-partner</noindex> “In calculating the periods under paragraph E-ILRP.1.3. only the periods when the applicant’s partner is the same person as the applicant’s partner for the previous period of limited leave shall be taken into account.” So “A” will have to be in the UK for a continued period of 5 years from the leave granted under the second marriage in order to qualify for Settlement in the UK. >>> Applying for a UK visa from the USA ? The current Guidance on applying for a UK visa in the USA can be found here: <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...visa-in-the-usa</noindex>