British Lawyer

- EEAPR (EU+non-EEA): 5 месяцев и 2 недели.

Я могу помочь: <noindex>https://www.legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html</noindex>

Приветствую, 1) Может (если ребенок UK citizen) 2) Бенефиты в Вашем случае не засчитываются как дополнительный доход (за исключением DLA и т.п.). 3) Не включаются 4) Да - 18 600

Благодаря форуму съкономили £££....

Из последних 3-х заявлений моих клиентов на Украине (гостевые визы на 6 месяцев и на 2 года), срок рассмотрения был 10 дней.

Ссылку на официальный источник можете дать ?

Моя ссылка еще действительно. Свободный текст, как Вам проще и легче писать. Вы - заявитель, у Вас есть права и справедливые ожидания.

•Updated Home Office guidance on revoking migrant driving licenses: <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...nder-management</noindex> Briefly, this guidance tells Interventions and Sanctions Directorate (ISD) case liaison officers about the driving licence revocation process, including how to deal with a request made by a migrant with a UK driving licence, or the migrant’s representative, not to revoke the driving licence.

- EEA FM (клиентка обратилась после отказа, помог получить по категории self-sufficient) - 5.5 месяцев - AN (бывшая клиентка, кому я снала помог получит Retained Right of Residence, потом Permanent Residence и вот теперь - гражданство): 2.5 месяца

Я сталкивался. Точный код не помню. Например, румын приехал с женой украинкой, у нее была румынская виза - ID карта. Получила штамп на 6 месяцев в паспорт на въезде. Я этой женщине потом получил 5-и летний EEA RP.

Приветствую, Сейчас практически под 6 месяцев для non-EEA.

Планируется ПЯТИКРАТНОЕ увеличение цен за апелляции: • The Government is proposing a massive FIVE FOLD increase in immigration appeal fees in order to make the immigration tribunal the only part of the court and tribunal service entirely self- funded by fees. Link: <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/tribunals</noindex> Quote: “We therefore propose increasing fees in the First-tier Tribunal from £80 to £490 for an application for a decision on the papers and from £140 to £800 for an application for an oral hearing. We also propose introducing a new fee of £455 for an application to the First-tier Tribunal for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal. We also believe that the same principles should apply to appeals to the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) so the consultation also seeks views on introducing fees, set at full cost recovery levels, for these proceedings. The consultation proposes a fee of £350 for an application to the Upper Tribunal for permission to appeal, where permission has been refused by the First-tier Tribunal, and a fee of £510 for an appeal hearing where permission is granted”

UK & EEA Immigration Weekly law update, April 2016/4 •Tier 1 Entrepreneur policy guidance where the Pre 6 April 2014 transitional arrangement for job creation does not apply to accelerated settlement applications. The applicants applying under the accelerated route cannot rely on 24 months to equal 2 job roles or 2 part time employees doing different roles to equate to one role, despite applying prior to April 2014 •SM and Ihsan Qadir v Secretary of State for the Home Department, IA/31380/2014 & IA/36319/2014 (ETS/TOEIC cases) The Tribunal has marked the judgment "unreported" in status, which is disappointing as the unreported judgement cannot be used as a “precedent” in similar cases •MS v Secretary of State for the Home Department, UTIAC, AA/07855/2013 In a strongly worded judgment, The Hon. Mr Justice McCloskey, President and Upper Tribunal Judge Blum held that tribunals are empowered to make their own decision on whether an appellant is a victim of trafficking and to review a trafficking decision on the ground that it has been reached in breach of the Secretary of State’s policy guidance. It also found that tribunals may be better equipped than a Competent Authority to make pertinent findings related to trafficking. This case lays down important guidance in trafficking cases. Overturning the decisions of both the First-tier Tribunal and the Competent Authority, the Upper Tribunal held that MS was a victim of trafficking, a status which is current and enduring. The Tribunal also gave instruction that those engaging expert witnesses should ensure that the expert be provided with a copy of a section appearing at Annex A from the case of MOJ & Others, as a matter of course, at the initial stage of receiving instructions. The Tribunal however considered the asylum claim to be defeated owing to availability of internal flight alternative. Both parties have applied for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal: MS challenging the asylum decision and the Secretary of State challenging the jurisdiction of the Tribunal concerning the Trafficking Convention and the State's non-immigration related duties under Article 4 of the European Convention of Human Rights.

Из сотен заявлений клиентов в личных визитах, что я подавал, практически 97 % процентов карточек приходили на 3-1 рабочий день. В письме, которое Вы получили, должен быть E-mail. Попробуйте написать им и сообщите о запланированном мероприятии.

Приветствую, UK BA интересует работа "спонсора". Если "спонсор" меняет работу - об этом лучше сообщить UK BA с представлением доказательств.

Пожалуйста. Удачи.

Список принимаемых UK BA тестов: <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...-language-tests</noindex>

Надеюсь, у Вас все получится :-)

+1...... Действительно подозритеьно.

Приветствую, Если не удобно ездить с кучей документов, доказывающих изменение имени, то Ваша жена может пдать форму NTL чтобы выдали ночую BRP карточку (визы уже не клеят) с новой фамилией.

Я ежедневно работаю с тем или иным заявлением UK BA. И каждый день через сайт UK BA проверяю формы. Одна из форм поменялась в марте....и снова в апреле. Лучше проверить.

Приветствую, UK BA дал неправильный совет (часто бывает и обычно по телефону). Уведомлять о смене работы нужно как можно быстрее, и досылать документы. Иначе может быть отказ - UK BA проверяет работу EU спонсора по данным из анкеты и приложенным документм...Сложите "2+2" как говорят.

UK & EEA Immigration Case Law Updates – End of April 2016 -Luu (Periods of study: degree level) [2016] UKUT 00181(IAC) Periods of study for a qualification below degree level, are capable of being counted as time spent studying at degree level for the purpose of paragraph 245ZX(ha), if the period of study is taught at degree level, and when the qualification itself is added to other periods of study, resulting in the award of a degree -BJ (Singh explained) Sri Lanka [2016] UKUT 00184 (IAC) Singh (No immigration decision – jurisdiction) [2013] UKUT 00440 (IAC) is authority for proposition that the First-tier Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear an appeal only where there has been an immigration decision. It is not authority for the proposition that where an immigration decision has been made the First-tier Tribunal has no jurisdiction to hear an appeal against such decision unless the SSHD has first complied with her obligations under the Immigration (Notices) Regulations 2003. - Chau Le (Immigration Rules - de minimis principle) [2016] UKUT 00186 (IAC) The de minimis principle is not engaged in the construction or application of the Immigration Rules. Properly analysed, it is a mere surrogate for the discredited “near miss” or “sliding scale” principle. -Tukhas (para 245HD(f): “appropriate salary”) [2016] UKUT 00183 (IAC) The effect of paragraph 14 of Appendix J to the Immigration Rules is that other than where an applicant has contracted weekly hours or is paid an hourly rate, the appropriate salary for the purposes of paragraph 79 of Appendix A is an applicant’s gross annual salary paid by the sponsor employer, subject to the conditions set out in paragraphs 79(i)-(iii) of Appendix A. -R (on the application of Onowu) v First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) (extension of time for appealing: principles) IJR [2016] UKUT 00185 (IAC) In considering whether to exercise discretion to extend time for seeking permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal, both the First-tier Tribunal and the Upper Tribunal should apply the approach commended by the Court of Appeal in Mitchell v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1537; Denton v White [2014] EWCA Civ 906 and R (Hysaj) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWCA Civ 1663. -Chege (“is a persistent offender”) [2016] UKUT 00187 (IAC) 1. The question whether the appellant “is a persistent offender” is a question of mixed fact and law and falls to be determined by the Tribunal as at the date of the hearing before it. 2. The phrase “persistent offender” in s.117D(2)© of the 2002 Act must mean the same thing as “persistent offender” in paragraph 398© of the Immigration Rules. 3. A “persistent offender” is someone who keeps on breaking the law. That does not mean, however, that he has to keep on offending until the date of the relevant decision or that the continuity of the offending cannot be broken. A “persistent offender” is not a permanent status that can never be lost once it is acquired, but an individual can be regarded as a “persistent offender” for the purpose of the Rules and the 2002 Act even though he may not have offended for some time. The question whether he fits that description will depend on the overall picture and pattern of his offending over his entire offending history up to that date. Each case will turn on its own facts.

Пиветствую, Если виза до 6 месяцев - не нужно.

Пожалуйста. Рад был помочь.