British Lawyer

Каждый день приносит хорошие новости клиентам Legal Centre Сегодня очередной клиент из России получил ПМЖ/ILR (Indefinite Levae to Remain) по категории Tier 1 Exceptional Talent В свое время я помог этому клиенту перейти с категории Tier 2 (General) в категорию Tier 1 (Exceptional Talent). Я работал с клиенткой по принципу полного сопровождения: https://legalcentre.org/Pomosh.html Результат не заставил себя ждать – заявление рассмотрели в тот же день за 4 часа по принципу Super Premium Service. Я помог десяткам тысяч других клиентов, и я могу помочь Вам. Вы можете записаться на телефонную/online консультацию со мной, Антоном Ковалем, 24 часа в сутки: https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html Антон Коваль Legal Centre +44(0)7791145923 (Mob/WhatsApp/Viber) +44(0)3300010342 (Office) www.legalcentre.org

Приветствую. Супруг не нужен.

01 October 2019 – Just useful and interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre – Open 7 days a week - www.legalcentre.org – +44(0)3300010342, +44(0)7791145023 (WhatsApp/Viber) >>> Restricted Certificates of Sponsorship (RCoS) applications made by 5 October can invoke the new Shortage Occupation List The Immigration Rules are due to change on 6 October 2019, as heralded by statement of changes HC 2631. One particularly notable change will be the amendment of the Shortage Occupation List, with many roles being added to the list and some removed. One advantage of a role being on the Shortage Occupation List is that no Resident Labour Market Test is required when advertising it. Generally, if an employer wants to sponsor a non-European worker for a Tier 2 work visa, they must first advertise the vacancy and demonstrate that there were no suitable settled workers. Roles on the shortage list do not come with this requirement, significantly lessening the administrative burden for sponsors. Another big advantage of a role being on the list is to do with ‘Restricted Certificates of Sponsorship’ (RCoS). With some exceptions, an RCoS is required if an employer wants to sponsor a worker who requires entry clearance and is coming from abroad (or a dependent of a Tier 4 migrant who requires leave to remain and is switching to Tier 2). There is a monthly quota for RCoS, and a sponsor needs to submit an application by the 5th of each month to be considered in that month’s allocation. Roles on the shortage list get a boosting in the scoring system used to award RCoS — again making it better for employers to have the role being recruited for including on the list. The shortage list is to expand on 6 October. Sponsors have to make their October RCoS applications by the 5th of October with a decision normally around the 12th. A sponsor can therefore apply for a role which they know will be on the shortage list from 6 October, even though it isn’t when they actually apply. They do not have to wait until November to rely on the new list. So all’s well that ends well.

Каждый день приносит хорошие новости клиентам Legal Centre Сегодня очередной клиент из России получил ПМЖ/ILR (Indefinite Leave to Remain) по категории Tier 1 (Exceptional Talent). В свое время я помог этому клиенту переключиться с категории Tier 2 (General) на категорию Tier 1 (Exceptional Talent). Как и в прошлый раз, я работал с этим клиентом по принципу общего сопровождения: https://www.legalcentre.org/Obshee-soprovozdenie.html Результат не заставил себя ждать – заявление рассмотрели в тот же день за 4 часа по принципу Super Premium Service. Я помог десяткам тысяч других клиентов, и я могу помочь Вам. Вы можете записаться на телефонную/online консультацию со мной, Антоном Ковалем, 24 часа в сутки: https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html Антон Коваль Legal Centre +44(0)7791145923 (Mob/WhatsApp/Viber) +44(0)3300010342 (Office) www.legalcentre.org

Хорошо. Запись на консультацию как всегда по этой ссылке: https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html

Приветствую, Зависит от категории. В основном "1 слот на всех". Но должны быть отдельные biometric letters. Могу срочно проконсультировать по тел. завтра с утра: www.legalcentre.org

30 September 2019 – Just useful and interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre – Open 7 days a week - www.legalcentre.org – +44(0)3300010342, +44(0)7791145023 (WhatsApp/Viber) >>> The status of EU immigration and asylum law after Brexit The government’s stated aim is to leave the EU, with or without a deal, on 31 October 2019. If there is a deal, there will be a transitional period. During this time nothing will change and EU law will continue. Under the deal negotiated by Theresa May, that period would last until 31 December 2020. The period under any deal negotiated by Boris Johnson is likely to be the same or similar. The more pertinent question, given that very little progress has been made towards concluding a deal, is what happens if there is a no-deal Brexit? The UK will leave the EU by automatic operation of law on 31 October 2019. The Benn Act requires the Prime Minister (whoever that may be at the time) to seek an extension from the EU to 31 January 2020 if a deal has not been approved by Parliament before 19 October 2019. Boris Johnson has suggested he will not comply with this Act. In any case, complying with the Act would not prevent no deal; merely delay it until January. So what exactly is the status of EU immigration and asylum law in the UK after no deal? EU free movement law after Brexit The date the UK leaves the EU is referred to in Brexit legislation as “exit day”. Various things happen automatically on exit day. Firstly, under section 2 of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018, all UK legislation derived from EU law continues to have effect. This includes, for example, the Immigration (EEA) Regulations 2016 — the legislation that implements EU free movement law in the UK. Directly effective EU rights, including those in the Free Movement Directive, also become part of UK law automatically on exit day (under section 4 of the Act). Where the EU legislation concerned is a directive, as is the case with much of the detail of free movement law, only rights which have been recognised by the Court of Justice of the EU prior to exit day become part of UK law. The supremacy of EU law continues in relation to pre-Brexit law so, as is the case now, where the 2016 Regulations and rights recognised under the Free Movement Directive are in conflict, the directive prevails (needless to say, the supremacy of EU law does not apply to post-Brexit UK law). As such, very little changes overnight on exit day. That being said, from exit day onwards all this “retained EU law” can be changed in future by the UK Parliament, without any limits being imposed by EU law. So we will have to keep track of any amendments made. What we already know is that on exit day the 2016 Regulations will be amended by legislation passed back in March 2019 by Theresa May’s government. One of the main ones is to abolish the rules on deporting EU citizens and replace them with a system more favourable to the Home Office. Other changes will be made by the Immigration and Social Security Co-Ordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill. This bill has been revived recently following the Supreme Court’s decision to quash the prorogation of Parliament. Schedule 1 contains a list of EU immigration laws that would be repealed once that bill is passed and comes into force, which includes the 2016 Regulations. EU asylum law after Brexit Due to the Common European Asylum System, Brexit will also affect those claiming asylum in the UK. Asylum law is based on a variety of international, European Union and domestic legislation. The international law — the Refugee Convention and the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) — will not be affected by Brexit. Despite the name, the ECHR is not an EU treaty. Domestic legal provisions — such as the asylum section of the Immigration Rules — will also remain substantially unchanged. The EU law — namely the Qualification Directive and Procedures Directive — and EU-derived domestic law such as the Refugee of Persons in Need of International Protection (Qualification) Regulation 2006 which implement the Qualification Directive in the UK will become retained EU law on exit day in the same way as the 2016 Regulations. The Qualification Directive and the UK regulations implementing them outline the criteria for determining asylum clams. However, as they are based on international treaties such as the Refugee Convention and ECHR which will remain unchanged by Brexit, the underlying law is unlikely to change substantially even if they are repealed after Brexit. Some asylum legislation has already been earmarked for immediate repeal on exit day by those March 2019 regulations mentioned earlier. Anything which is not included in these regulations will become retained EU law and remain in place, until amended or repealed after Brexit. An important example of legislation which will be repealed on exit day is the Dublin III Regulation. This is the piece of EU law which allows the UK to return asylum seekers to an EU country they passed through on their way to the UK. It is marked down for immediate repeal because it is meaningless without cooperation of other EU member states. Under transitional provisions, some parts of the Regulation will continue to apply to requests for family reunion which have been made, but not decided, before Brexit. However, for most purposes, the Regulation will no longer be part of UK law. For a full list of the asylum-related EU legislation which will be revoked on exit day see here: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2019/745/schedule/1/part/2/made Again, there may be more such changes in future, but anything not explicitly repealed is kept in force. EU case law after Brexit Case law refers to the decisions of courts and tribunals interpreting and applying legislation and common law rules. It often clarifies the meaning or effect of legal provisions and is frequently used by lawyers to support a particular interpretation or application of the law. Such cases set precedents that become part of the law, meaning that the same issue does not need to be litigated over and over again. The Court of Justice of the European Union interprets and applies EU law. Its judgments are binding on UK courts (and, despite its habitual reluctance, the UK government). This will end after Brexit. UK courts will not be bound by future Court of Justice decisions after exit day and will not be able to refer questions of EU law to that court. UK courts “may have regard” to Court of Justice case law handed down after Brexit (and post-Brexit EU legislation, in fact) if they want. But they do not have to. It is essentially up to UK judges to decide if, and to what extent, certain provisions of EU law are to apply in the UK after Brexit. So to know which new EU cases are relevant to UK immigration law, we will have to keep an eye on the UK case law. They will not be automatically relevant, as they are now. If a helpful Court of Justice case is handed down, lawyers can highlight this and seek to persuade the UK court or tribunal to follow it; in the same way that a Scottish lawyer might highlight a non-binding decision of an English court with a view to having it followed in the Scottish courts (or vice versa). What about Court of Justice case law from before Brexit? This will apply when interpreting retained EU law, and all lower courts are required to follow it. However, the Supreme Court can depart from this pre-Brexit case law if it wishes. This can be done in the same way that the Supreme Court can depart from its own case law i.e. when in the circumstances of the case “it would be right for it to do so”. For instance, when adhering to a previous decision “would produce serious anomalies” or other “plainly unsatisfactory” results; when there has been “a fundamental change in circumstances”; or when there is experience showing that the previous decision has resulted in “unforeseen serious injustice” (see Austin v Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Southwark [2010] UKSC 28 at paragraphs 24 to 26 for further details). The test for departing from Court of Justice case law after Brexit will be the same.

Спасибо. Буду рад Вам помочь.

Приветствую. Теоретически можете, но тогда это будет по другому правилу. Могут "потрепать" на границе.

Каждый день приносит хорошие новости клиентам Legal Centre Сегодня очередная клиентка из Украины получила EU Settled Status (ILR). Заявление было не простое – клиентке пришлось несколько раз переделывать и добавлять документы. Я работал с клиенткой по принципу общего сопровождения: https://www.legalcentre.org/Obshee-soprovozdenie.html Результат не заставил себя ждать – заявление рассмотрели очень быстро. Я помог десяткам тысяч других клиентов, и я могу помочь Вам. Вы можете записаться на телефонную/online консультацию со мной, Антоном Ковалем, 24 часа в сутки: https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html Антон Коваль Legal Centre +44(0)7791145923 (Mob/WhatsApp/Viber) +44(0)3300010342 (Office) www.legalcentre.org

Обратите внимание на ВСЕ требования в Вашей ситуации.

Приветствую 1. Это не сложный случай, просто самая сложная категория по доказательству дохода. 2. Все мои клиенты получали визы по ускоренному принципу даже по этой категории. 3. Чуда нет. Просто нужно знать Правила, какие документы именно нудны и то, как такие заявления рассматривают мои коллеги из Home Office.

Отлично. Буду рад Вам помочь.

Я могу и перевести. Просто будет стоить дороже, т.е. по британским расценкам. Я предоставляю британский сертификат перевода высшего уровня (MCIL). Документ в формате .pdf. То есть как обычно делается в таких случаях, т.к. оригинал не нужен. Если оригинал нужен, могу выслать в любую страну. Мои заверения обновлять не нужно. Можете использовать на всех этапах Вашего иммиграционного пути, и не только.

Приветствую. Апостиль не нужен. Нужен правильно заверенный перевод. Я как боитанский адвокат могу заверить перевод с декларацией, если нужно.

Нет, его пишут в P60 только. Формат номера, например: 675/123567 и т.п. В HR отделении на Вашей работе должны знать так же.

Приветствую. Да, это будет не простое заявление. Вместо одной иммиграционной категории по доходу возможно будет нужно показать ТРИ категории. Тут главное не запутаться и все правильно сделать. И главное, чтобы дохода хватило по требованиям Home Office.

27 September 2019 – Just useful and interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre – Open 7 days a week - www.legalcentre.org – +44(0)3300010342, +44(0)7791145023 (WhatsApp/Viber) >>> Possible upcoming changes in the UK Visa Application process: The Home Office has recently said that they would like to move away from requiring biometrics and document uploading for every stage once a document has been viewed once in a previous application >> > Appellant can remain in UK to pursue EEA appeal even if lodged abroad: Of course, if the appellant can get back in. The case is Isufaj (PTA decisions/reasons; EEA reg. 37 appeals) [2019] UKUT 283 (IAC). There is no right of admission but if admitted the appeal can be pursued from within the UK. Why the case gets reported for that when it was uncontentious — and some would say obvious — is a bit of a mystery. The other point on which the case is reported could be dealt with by an internal memo. The official headnote: “(1) Judges deciding applications for permission to appeal should ensure that, as a general matter, there is no apparent contradiction between the decision on the application and what is said in the “reasons for decision” section of the document that records the decision and the reasons for it. As was said in Safi and others (permission to appeal decisions) [2018] UKUT 388 (IAC), a decision on a permission application must be capable of being under-stood by the Tribunal’s administrative staff, the parties and by the court or tribunal to which the appeal lies. In the event of such an apparent contradiction or other uncertainty, the par-ties can expect the Upper Tribunal to treat the decision as the crucial element. (2) Although regulation 37(1) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 provides that a person may not appeal under regulation 36 whilst he or she is in the United Kingdom, where the decision in question falls within regulation 37(1)(a) to (g), once the appeal is instituted by a person who is then outside the United Kingdom, there is no statutory prohibition on the appeal continuing if the person concerned thereafter is physically present in the United Kingdom. It will, however, be for the Secretary of State to decide whether to give that person temporary admission for the purpose of attending an appeal hearing, since regulation 41 does not apply to such cases.” >>> UKVI update: Family life (as a partner or parent), private life and exceptional circumstances: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjhmsTV6O7kAhWQmBQKHSiyBz0QFjAAegQIARAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.gov.uk%2Fgovernment%2Fpublications%2Ffamily-life-as-a-partner-or-parent-private-life-and-exceptional-circumstance&usg=AOvVaw0kB700rK_YDFGDFnWYSliZ How UK Visas and Immigration staff consider claims on the basis of family life, private life, or exceptional circumstances. "Changes from last version of this guidance Minor update to amend LTR requirements to mirror rules." >>> UKVI update: Nationality policy: Naturalisation as a British citizen by discretion: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwi6p76r6O7kAhUPmRQKHTuPCIQQFjAAegQIABAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.publishing.service.gov.uk%2Fgovernment%2Fuploads%2Fsystem%2Fuploads%2Fattachment_data%2Ffile%2F792970%2Fnaturalisation-as-a-british-citizen-by-discretion-v3.0ext.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1P6RBdxCJenOCkAjqy5UjX Guidance on applications for naturalisation as a British citizen. "Changes from last version of this guidance Temporary admission has been replaced by immigration bail. Changed “temporary admission” to “immigration bail”. Clarified that spouses and civil partners of British citizens in the armed forces should be considered under the criteria for spouses and civil partners of Crown servants."

Каждый день приносит хорошие новости клиентам Legal Centre Сегодня очередная клиентка из России получила визу EEA Family Permit для приезда и проживания со своим супругом в Великобритании. Я работал с клиенткой по принципу полного сопровождения: https://legalcentre.org/Pomosh.html Результат не заставил себя ждать – заявление рассмотрели за пару недель. Я помог десяткам тысяч других клиентов, и я могу помочь Вам. Вы можете записаться на телефонную/online консультацию со мной, Антоном Ковалем, 24 часа в сутки: https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html Антон Коваль Legal Centre +44(0)7791145923 (Mob/WhatsApp/Viber) +44(0)3300010342 (Office) www.legalcentre.org

Приветствую, По текущим Правилам в отношении Online заявлений датой подачи считается дата подачи/оплаты анкеты: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjy3qLAie7kAhVx6uAKHassBMQQFjACegQIABAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.publishing.service.gov.uk%2Fgovernment%2Fuploads%2Fsystem%2Fuploads%2Fattachment_data%2Ffile%2F760916%2Fapplications-for-leave-to-remain-v2.0-ext.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0fTTHta2HGGX3W-Y5AmzvW После этого все документы "замораживаются", т.е. не устаревают. Главное, подготовить свежие документы на момент даты подачи заявления.

26 September 2019 – Just useful and interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre – Open 7 days a week - www.legalcentre.org – +44(0)3300010342, +44(0)7791145023 (WhatsApp/Viber) >> > Court of Justice finds that self-employed women have maternity rights: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf;jsessionid=0A5397EAB01B564BCBF0A908AA87FB76?text=&docid=217904&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=15295724 The Court of Justice of the European Union has had to find that self-employed EU citizens retain rights of residence during their maternity period. Why on earth the government of the United Kingdom tried to argue they did not is one of those mysteries to which we’ll probably never know the answer. Particularly when the outcome of the case — C 544/18 HMRC v Dakneviciute — seemed legally inevitable and Brexit has highlighted the need for security of residence rights for women.

Каждый день приносит хорошие новости клиентам Legal Centre Сегодня очередная клиентка из Украины получила ее ПМЖ/ILR (Indefinite Leave to Remain) на основании долгосрочного пребывания в Великобритании. Заявление было не простое – клиентке пришлось несколько раз переделывать и добавлять документы. Я работал с клиенткой по принципу полного сопровождения: https://legalcentre.org/Pomosh.html Результат не заставил себя ждать – заявление рассмотрели в тот же день за 4 часа по принципу Super Premium Service. Я помог десяткам тысяч других клиентов, и я могу помочь Вам. Вы можете записаться на телефонную/online консультацию со мной, Антоном Ковалем, 24 часа в сутки: https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html Антон Коваль Legal Centre +44(0)7791145923 (Mob/WhatsApp/Viber) +44(0)3300010342 (Office) www.legalcentre.org

Зависит от страны. Некоторые - разрешают. Некоторые - нет. Были случаи, когда звонили из аэропорта - help ! help ! - не пускают, а сделать уже ничего нельзя. Так же - Brexit - с этим может быть проблема в любой момент. Рекомендация: оформите шенген и спите спокойно .

25 September 2019 – Just useful and interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre – Open 7 days a week - www.legalcentre.org – +44(0)3300010342, +44(0)7791145023 (WhatsApp/Viber) >> > The current Home Office guidance on permission to work and volunteer for asylum seekers: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/handling-applications-for-permission-to-take-employment-instruction Changes since the last version of the guidance: • updated to include reference to criminality and delay when considering permission to work applications • improved guidance on applying for permission to work to provide clarity for claimants on what is expected • updated information about the difference between working for a voluntary organisation and volunteering to make clearer that asylum seekers are able to volunteer • new guidance template applied, and section and paragraph numbering removed in line with guidance requirements The new section on volunteering is considerably clearer than the old version.

Каждый день приносит хорошие новости клиентам Legal Centre Сегодня очередная клиентка из Украины получила ПМЖ/ILR (Indefinite Leave to Remain) как PBS Dependent. Я помогал этой клиентке и ее мужу на всех этапах из иммиграционного пути в Великобританию. Сейчас эта клиентка может сразу подавать на британское гражданство.. Я работал с клиенткой по принципу полного сопровождения: https://legalcentre.org/Pomosh.html Результат не заставил себя ждать – заявление рассмотрели в тот же день за 4 часа по принципу Super Premium Service. Я помог десяткам тысяч других клиентов, и я могу помочь Вам. Вы можете записаться на телефонную/online консультацию со мной, Антоном Ковалем, 24 часа в сутки: https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html Антон Коваль Legal Centre +44(0)7791145923 (Mob/WhatsApp/Viber) +44(0)3300010342 (Office) www.legalcentre.org