British Lawyer

Пожалуйста. Был рад Вам помочь.

13 August 2019 – Just useful and interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre – Open 7 days a week - www.legalcentre.org – +44(0)3300010342, +44(0)7791145023 (WhatsApp/Viber) >>> Can a Tier 4 Student - main applicant - rely on his bank statements if the bank account is in joint names, such as the applicant’s name and the dependent spouse’s name ? The answer is “Yes”: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/immigration-rules/immigration-rules-appendix-c-maintenance-funds 1A (k) If the applicant wishes to rely on a joint account as evidence of available funds, the applicant (or for children under 18 years of age, the applicant’s parent or legal guardian who is legally present in the United Kingdom) must be named on the account as one of the account holders. 13 (i) the applicant (whether as a sole or joint account holder); and/or >>> Can a Tier 2 Dependent provide his bank statements for maintenance funds ? The answer is “Yes: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/immigration-rules/immigration-rules-appendix-e-maintenance-funds-for-the-family-of-relevant-points-based-system-migrants Appendix E (c) Where the applicant is applying as the Partner of a Relevant Points Based System Migrant or Appendix W Worker the relevant amount of funds must be available to either the applicant or the Relevant Points Based System Migrant or Appendix W Worker. … (f) In all cases, the funds in question must be available to: (i) the applicant, or (ii) where they are applying as the partner of a Relevant Points Based System Migrant or Appendix W Worker, either to them or to that Relevant Points Based System Migrant or Appendix W Worker

Каждый день приносит хорошие новости клиентам Legal Centre Вот и очередная клиентка из России получила ПМЖ (Settlement - Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR)). Я помогал этой клиентке с получением визы жены, потом с продлением и вот теперь - с получением ILR. Как всегда, заявление подавалось по принципу Super Premium Service. Результат не заставил себя ждать – заявление рассмотрели за 24 часа. Я помог десяткам тысяч других клиентов, и я могу помочь Вам. Вы можете записаться на телефонную/online консультацию со мной, Антоном Ковалем, 24 часа в сутки: https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html Антон Коваль Legal Centre +44(0)7791145923 (Mob/WhatsApp/Viber) +44(0)3300010342 (Office) www.legalcentre.org

Приветствую, У Вас - ILR - не повлияет. Все будет хорошо (с).

12 August 2019 – Just useful and interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre – Open 7 days a week - www.legalcentre.org – +44(0)3300010342, +44(0)7791145023 (WhatsApp/Viber) >>> The return of the HSMP or the Tier 1(General) programmes ? https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/political-parties/conservative-party/news/105814/boris-johnson-unveils-immigration-shake Boris Johnson has pledged to make it quicker and easier for foreign scientists to settle in the UK under a shake-up of immigration rules after Brexit. >>> Student facing death penalty for ISIS membership stripped of British citizenship: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2019/2169.html A student who ran away to join ISIS in Syria has lost a legal challenge to the UK government’s decision to take away his British citizenship. The judgment, handed down yesterday and the first case of its kind in the High Court, is R (Islam) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] EWHC 2169 (Admin). >>> UKVI update: Country returns guide for August: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/country-returns-guide Home Office guidance on the documents required and processes for returning immigration offenders to their country of origin. Updated to add August 2019 information.

Добрый день, Если будете использовать шаблон - это может привести к отказу, т.к. визовому офицеру на стол могут лечь хх количество заявлений с подобным содержанием сопроводительного письма... Напишите от себя просто письмо, обьясняя кто Вы, кем Вам приходится человек, которого Вы приглашаете, для чего он приезжает, что, как и где конкретно будет делать. За какие средства будет поездка и как получается, что это может быть осуществимо. + Список документов. Срок поездки зависит от целей.

Приветствую, Отличные новости. Был рад помочь Вам.

Пожалуйста. Буду рад Вам помочь.

Я знаком с этой практикой. Нужна помощь - я здесь: https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html

Как я и предпологал. Перед тем, как подать такое заявление, Вы не с кем не консультировались. Обьяснительную не писали ? Право оспорить есть ?

Поддерживаю Игоря. После 21 года человек МОЖЕТ считаться зависимым, если он живет вместе с EU national, е работает (или чуть-чуть) и т.п. Должны были дать отказ с обоснованием. Обычно есть процесс оспаривания. Я периодически работаю с такими вопросами - отказы из университетов, больниц. Нужны детали.

Доброе утро. Ваша информация частично верная. Существуют и другие Важные аспекты, не отраженные в общедоступном руководстае в несколько страниц, на который Вы ссылаетесь.

Приветствую, Нет, требования существенно отличаются. Можете посмотреть несколько сот страниц здесь и выбрать для себя правильный вариант: https://www.gov.uk/topic/immigration-operational-guidance/nationality-guidance Или здесь, по-русски и по делу конкретно по Вашей ситуации: https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html

08 August 2019 – Just useful and interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre – Open 7 days a week - www.legalcentre.org – +44(0)3300010342, +44(0)7791145023 (WhatsApp/Viber) >>> Change in law for European families offers temporary hope for unrecognised adoptions: https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2018/9.html A small amendment to UK law could soon make a big difference to European families resident here who are struggling to bring home children adopted in Muslim countries abroad. A change to the legal definition of who counts as an EEA citizen’s “family member” should end the uncertainty over the status of children in kafala arrangements. Kafala is a system of permanent legal guardianship operating in many Muslim countries, where full adoption is usually prohibited. While some families here view the arrangement as permanent, others consider it a stepping stone to full adoption in the UK, as kafala is sometimes the only way to gain legal custody of a child in his or her birth country. The amendment to the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016, which takes effect on 15 August 2019, explicitly recognises relationships where the child is under 18 and “is subject to a non-adoptive legal guardianship order in favour of an EEA national that is recognised under the national law of the state in which it was contracted”. This provision means that EEA citizens living in the UK, who have entered a kafala adoption overseas, can now apply for a visa to bring their child home. >>> VFS Update: Scanning Hub and Preferred Partner operation moving – USA “Dear Partners, I’m writing to inform you that our Scanning Hub and Preferred Partner operation is moving by end of the month to our Joint Visa Application Centre located in Times Square. Please see timelines for you to be aware of: Thursday August 22: Last day for Preferred Partner submissions in current premise Friday August 23: Last day in current premise, No Preferred Partner submissions Saturday August 24: VFS Moving Sunday August 25: VFS Moving Monday August 26: Preferred Partner submissions to begin out of our Premium Application Centre Tuesday August 27: Operations to resume as BAU Address: 145 West 45th St, Floor 5, New York NY 10036 Preferred Partner submissions will take place within our Premium Application Centre on the 5th floor from 26th onwards. When entering the building, you will be required to sign in at the building security desk before proceeding up to the 5th floor. At the 5th floor, there will be a security check by a VFS guard before entering the centre We thank you for your patience during this transitional time. UKVI & Canada VAC Operations – USA"

Пожалуйста. Был рад помочь Вам.

07 August 2019 – Just useful and interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre – Open 7 days a week - www.legalcentre.org – Mob : +44(0)7791145923 >>> National Savings Premium Bonds in an FM application – the Home Office’s clarification and… apology One may not come to see the apology from the Home Office. Here we go: From the Home Office: “Our current policy in relation to premium bonds is as follows: Premium bond holdings cannot be counted in themselves towards meeting the minimum income threshold. Owning a capital asset such as a bond, does not in itself provide the means to support a spouse or partner. However, any income received from the asset, or the cash savings derived from its liquidation, can be counted towards meeting the minimum income threshold. A couple’s income and cash savings are the most reliable and practicable indicator of their financial status and independence for the purposes of this requirement. The individual may choose to rely on cash savings above £16,000 (the level of savings at which a person would generally not qualify for income-related benefits) held by the sponsor, the applicant or jointly for at least six months at the date of application, or derived from the liquidation of assets and transfer of funds from stocks, shares or bonds or sale of assets such as a property within that six-month period, to be used in place of or in addition to income to meet the minimum income threshold. If the premium bonds are liquidated and the money transferred into a personal bank or savings account in the sponsor’s or their spouse or partner’s name or them jointly, their value held as cash savings can be counted towards the minimum income threshold, provided evidence shows the sponsors ownership of the bonds for the balance of the period of six months prior to the date of application. It is the cash held in a personal or savings account which must be accessible immediately. Full details of the ways in which the minimum income requirement may be met can be found on GOV.UK by searching for Appendix FM 1.7 Financial Requirement here: www.homeoffice.gov.uk. Therefore, our previous guidance was not quite correct and we apologise for the confusion. Money received from liquidated premium bonds can be used providing they have been deposited in an account and there is evidence that the bonds have been in the applicant’s possession for the 6 months prior to their application. Therefore the bonds have to be deposited within that 6 months. The same rules will also apply for fixed term bank savings bonds.” >>> Student who innocently relied on fake certificate of sponsorship refused visa for producing “false document”: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2019/1324.html The ground of appeal in Hameed v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] EWCA Civ 1324 was: "It was wrong to find the appellant had made a false representation under paragraph 322(1A) of the Immigration Rules when he had not acted dishonestly." Mr Hameed had applied for a student visa using a certificate of sponsorship (CoS) that was, unknown to him, not genuine. The Home Office accordingly refused his application on the basis of paragraph 322(1A). It reads: “where false representations have been made or false documents or information have been submitted (whether or not material to the application, and whether or not to the applicant’s knowledge), or material facts have not been disclosed, in relation to the application or in order to obtain documents from the Secretary of State or a third party required in support of the application.” Counsel for Mr Hameed took a close look at this wording and argued that he had not fallen foul of it. A certificate of sponsorship is a digitally generated number and so is not a “document”. Mr Hameed may have made a “representation” by submitting the certificate of sponsorship with his visa application, but it was not “false”, in the sense that he genuinely believed that it was valid. Any dishonesty was on the part of whoever passed him the fake certificate. The Court of Appeal disagreed with the premise. It said that this was, in fact, a “false document” case: the certificate of sponsorship had been printed out and submitted in hard copy. Even if it hadn’t been printed out, Sir Ernest Ryder held that “a document can be a virtual or online document… a sensible reading of ‘document’ in paragraph 322(1A) includes online documents like a CoS”. Since this was a false document case, there was no need for the Home Office to establish dishonesty or deception: Adedoyin v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 773. In that case, the Court of Appeal held: Of course it is possible for a person to make use of a false document… in total ignorance of its falsity and in perfect honesty. But the document itself is dishonest. It is highly likely therefore that where an applicant uses in all innocence a false document for the purposes of obtaining entry clearance, or leave to enter or to remain, it is because some other party, it might be a parent, or sponsor, or agent, has dishonestly promoted the use of the document. The response of a requirement of mandatory refusal is entirely understandable in such a situation. As so often in such cases, the result is hard luck on Mr Hameed, whom the court accepted was as much a victim in all this as anyone. >>> UKVI update: EU Settlement Scheme: person with a Zambrano right to reside: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjKz4CE7O7jAhVKBGMBHUqrDv0QFjABegQICxAF&url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.publishing.service.gov.uk%2Fgovernment%2Fuploads%2Fsystem%2Fuploads%2Fattachment_data%2Ffile%2F823680%2Feuss-zambrano-guidance-v1.0-ext.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1S_zzRN8E7Lu4zFjkpdKch Guidance for caseworkers considering applications under the EU Settlement Scheme. Change made - added guidance on persons with a Zambrano right to reside. Readers will, in particular, want to note pages 18 and 19 and especially the following excerpt: "This means that an applicant cannot be considered a ‘person with a Zambrano right to reside’ if they: • have (or for the relevant qualifying period had) leave to enter or remain in the UK (unless this was granted under Appendix EU) • have never made an application under Appendix FM to the Immigration Rules or any other Article 8 ECHR claim, where there is (or was) a realistic prospect that this would succeed (or would have succeeded) • have been refused leave under Appendix FM or otherwise under ECHR Article 8 but their circumstances have changed since that decision was made such that there is now a realistic prospect that a further such application would succeed - for example, the applicant applied on the basis of their relationship with a British citizen spouse, but the couple now have a British citizen child" >>> UKVI update: Sponsor guidance appendix D: keeping records for sponsorship: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwiHtc7D7O7jAhWJAWMBHc6BB_AQFjAAegQIABAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.publishing.service.gov.uk%2Fgovernment%2Fuploads%2Fsystem%2Fuploads%2Fattachment_data%2Ffile%2F819229%2F2019-07-19_Tier-2-5-sponsor-guidance_Mar-2019_v1.0_with_addendum.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2J3sVxfzu5o2_myCdVE3Su Guide to the sponsorship documents that businesses and educational institutions must keep. Change made - the guidance has been placed into a new template and revised throughout. Please note the following excerpt indicating the changes that have been made: "The guidance has been placed into a new template and revised, including: • clarifying the time period for which documents must be retained • updating the guidance on checking the date of entry when the migrant entered through automated ePassport gates (‘eGates’) • adding information on the Tier 5 creative and sporting visa concession • clarifying documentation that must be retained as evidence of carrying out a resident labour market test • replacing reference to ‘Tier 1 (Entrepreneur)’ with ‘Start-up’ • other minor clarifications, corrections and housekeeping changes"

06 August 2019 – Just useful and interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre – Open 7 days a week - www.legalcentre.org – Mob : +44(0)7791145923 >>> Applications from overstayers (non family routes): https://www.gov.uk/…/applications-from-overstayers-non-fami… Guidance for how UK Visas and Immigration considers applications for further leave to remain made by applicants without valid leave. >>> UKVI update: Immigration Rules archive: 6 July 2019 to 31 July 2019: https://www.gov.uk/…/immigration-rules-archive-6-july-2019-… >>> DNA evidence proves Home Office wrong about Calais child: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2019/1340.html A new Court of Appeal judgment has confirmed that the Home Office wrongly denied that a child asylum seeker seeking transfer to the UK had a brother already living in this country. The Home Office, as is its wont, claimed that the two young men were not related. The Up-per Tribunal decision in this case explains, at the start officials dismissed the idea of verifying the relationship using DNA evidence and then decided that undertaking a DNA test in France was not possible anyway. Fortunately, the Upper Tribunal found that the boy and his brother were related even without any DNA evidence and therefore the Home Office had to take charge of the boy’s asylum claim in the UK. The new judgment in MS (A child) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] EWCA Civ 1340 records that once the boy arrived in the UK. a DNA test proved that his claim had been true all along.

Приветствую. "Почти гражданин" - это шутка мне понравилась. В общую очередь. Пока.

Каждый день приносит хорошие новости клиентам Legal Centre Вот и очередная клиентка из России получила продление ее визы жены (заявление FLR(M)). Заявление было не простое – клиентке пришлось несколько раз переделывать и добавлять документы. Я работал с клиенткой по принципу общего сопровождения: https://legalcentre.org/Obshee-soprovozdenie.html Результат не заставил себя ждать – заявление рассмотрели за 24 часа по принципу Super Premium Service. Я помог десяткам тысяч других клиентов, и я могу помочь Вам. Вы можете записаться на телефонную/online консультацию со мной, Антоном Ковалем, 24 часа в сутки: https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html Антон Коваль Legal Centre +44(0)7791145923 (Mob/WhatsApp/Viber) +44(0)3300010342 (Office) www.legalcentre.org

В контексте "Internal ID" - нет. Proof: нужно только указывать его номер вообще-то. Хотя я, для подстраховки, загружаю и копию РАЗВОРОТА.

05 August 2019 – Just useful and interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre – Open 7 days a week - www.legalcentre.org – Mob : +44(0)7791145923 >>> I have a fiancé(i) visa. I am now married. Can I go for a honeymoon now ? The answer is “Yes”, in line with the https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/chapter-8-appendix-fm-family-members: “A spouse or civil partner can re-enter the UK following a honeymoon abroad during the remaining validity of their entry clearance as a fiancé, fiancée or proposed civil partner if they can satisfy the Immigration Officer, in the light of the change in their marital or civil partnership status (which they should evidence with a copy of the marriage or civil partnership certificate), of their intention, within the remaining validity of that entry clearance, to regularise their status in the UK as a spouse or civil partner. Any period of entry clearance or limited leave as a fiancé, fiancée or proposed civil partner does not count towards the continuous period of leave as a partner required for settlement.” >>> Domestic violence – can the victim (applicant) still reside in the matrimonial house or not ? The answer is “may be”. Page 20 of “Victims of domestic violence and abuse” Policy Guidance (Version 14.0): “The fact the couple are still living at the same address when the application is made may not necessarily be taken as an indicator the relationship has not broken down, as this could be due to a number of reasons.” The following case-law may also be of use: https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIAT/2009/00019.html >>> UKVI Guidance: Family Policy: Partners, divorce and dissolution published: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=9&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwi65ZbOsuvjAhUlxYUKHV62BjYQFjAIegQIARAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.publishing.service.gov.uk%2Fgovernment%2Fuploads%2Fsystem%2Fuploads%2Fattachment_data%2Ffile%2F804738%2FPartner_divorce_and_dissolution_guidance_v.1.0ext.pdf&usg=AOvVaw20FDtpFZjYNs3P241OKVqw How UK Visas and Immigration staff recognise a genuine and subsisting relationship and identify a valid divorce or dissolution of a civil partnership. >>> UKVI Guidance: Guidance on applications for UK Tier 4 student visas updated: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwiuq4nwsuvjAhUMThoKHUP-BUIQFjAAegQIAxAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.publishing.service.gov.uk%2Fgovernment%2Fuploads%2Fsystem%2Fuploads%2Fattachment_data%2Ffile%2F812143%2FT4_Migrant_Guidance_JUNE_2019_FINAL_v3.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3XoVLslrZqeY-hgq9ep9XO Guidance on UK Visas and Immigration’s policy for Tier 4 (General) Student and Tier 4 (Child) Student applications to stay or come to the UK updated.

Приветствую, Итак: 1. Да. 2. Да + Да ! 3. Детально и на родном для Вас языке по такому сложному заявлению здесь: https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html Подавать нужно максимально аккуратно, т.к. в случае отказа и мамы потенциально будет право переподать, а у ребенка старше 19 - уже нет.

Каждый день приносит хорошие новости клиентам Legal Centre Вот и очередная клиентка из Украины стала британской гражданкой. Рассмотрения заявления на натурализацию заняло всего 4 недели. Я помог десяткам тысяч других клиентов, и я могу помочь Вам. Вы можете записаться на телефонную/online консультацию со мной, Антоном Ковалем, 24 часа в сутки: https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html Антон Коваль Legal Centre +44(0)7791145923 (Mob/WhatsApp/Viber) +44(0)3300010342 (Office) www.legalcentre.org

Каждый день приносит хорошие новости клиентам Legal Centre Вот и очередная клиентка из России получила продление ее визы жены и может спокойно жить с ее мужем в Великобритании. Данная клиентка сначала обратилась в другую фирму, но потом перешла в Legal Centre, выбрав услугу т.н. Общего Сопровождения: https://legalcentre.org/Obshee-soprovozdenie.html Рассмотрения заявления FLR(M) заняло всего несколько часов, т.к. было подано по ускоренному (Super Premium Service) принципу. Я помог десяткам тысяч других клиентов, и я могу помочь Вам. Вы можете записаться на телефонную/online консультацию со мной, Антоном Ковалем, 24 часа в сутки: https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html Антон Коваль Legal Centre +44(0)7791145923 (Mob/WhatsApp/Viber) +44(0)3300010342 (Office) www.legalcentre.org

02 August 2019 – Just useful and interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre – Open 7 days a week - www.legalcentre.org – Mob : +44(0)7791145923 >>> UKVI Guidance: Correcting an incorrect endorsement: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/correcting-an-incorrect-endorsement-ecb19/correcting-an-incorrect-endorsement-ecb19 Information and guidance on handling visa applications made outside the UK. Added information for applicants who have discovered an error in their visa before they arrive in the UK. >>> New Home Office policy on removing migrants with children: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/family-life-as-a-partner-or-parent-private-life-and-exceptional-circumstance The Home Office has updated its main guidance on family visas under Appendix FM of the Immigration Rules. The good news is now we have one consolidated guidance document dealing with both the five and ten-year routes for partners, parents and private life applicants. The new guidance runs to 93 pages whereas the previous guidance for ten-year route applications was 104 pages alone. The other big clear-up is around the section dealing with applications under EX.1(a) of Appendix FM, which is about whether it is reasonable to expect a child to leave the UK with parents who have no right to remain here. This has always been quite a thorny issue and previous guidance has gone both ways. Versions before the Supreme Court’s decision in KO (Nigeria) [2018] UKSC 53 said that leave to remain should normally be given to parents of qualifying children, whereas post-KO (Nigeria) versions have had a more nuanced approach and still re-fer to the conduct of parents and their immigration status as being indirectly relevant. The new guidance is still a little con-fused in this respect and prefers the latter approach. However, gone are the parts of the guidance which said that if a child is not expected to leave the UK, then paragraph EX.1(a) does not apply. The new guidance makes clear that: “In accordance with the findings in the case of AB Jamaica (Secretary of State for the Home Department v AB (Jamaica) & Anor [2019] EWCA Civ 661), consideration of whether it is reasonable to expect a child to leave the UK must be undertaken regardless of whether the child is actually expected to leave the UK.”. One can find that even where a parent’s immigration status is pretty poor, the Home Office seems to be granting leave to remain to qualifying children under the ten-year route, as used to be the case before KO (Nigeria) muddied the waters. One wonders if this change in policy is likely to encourage caseworkers to be bolder and to refuse these types of application more often. Whilst the guidance has incorporated this change, it has overlooked or confused some of the other conclusions from AB (Jamaica). The document still has a noticeable bias against applicants who don’t have direct contact with their children. In these cases, the guidance says that it is “likely… that a relationship will not be sufficient to engage Article 8”. On the contrary, what the Court of Appeal actually said was: “… it is by no means inevitable that a tribunal will conclude that a parent has no “genuine and substantial parental relationship” absent direct contact. The way the Home Office has worded this is likely to infect decision-makers’ reasoning and steer them more towards refusing such an application.”