British Lawyer

Каждый день приносит хорошие новости клиентам Legal Centre Сегодня клиентка из России стала гражданкой Великобритании. Мы подавали заявление AN. Я работал с клиенткой по принципу полного сопровождения: https://legalcentre.org/Pomosh.html Результат не заставил себя ждать – заявление рассмотрели довольно быстро, всего за несколько недель. Я помог десяткам тысяч других клиентов, и я могу помочь Вам. Вы можете записаться на телефонную/online консультацию со мной, Антоном Ковалем, 24 часа в сутки: https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html Антон Коваль Legal Centre +44(0)7791145923 (Mob/WhatsApp/Viber) +44(0)3300010342 (Office) www.legalcentre.org

Пожалуйста. Буду рад Вам помочь.

Каждый день приносит хорошие новости клиентам Legal Centre Сегодня очередная клиентка из России получила продление ее визы жены по категории Appendix FM Partner (виза жены, заявление FLR(M)). Я работал с клиенткой по принципу полного сопровождения: https://legalcentre.org/Pomosh.html Результат не заставил себя ждать – заявление рассмотрели в тот же день за 4 часа по принципу Super Premium Service. Я помог десяткам тысяч других клиентов, и я могу помочь Вам. Вы можете записаться на телефонную/online консультацию со мной, Антоном Ковалем, 24 часа в сутки: https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html Антон Коваль Legal Centre +44(0)7791145923 (Mob/WhatsApp/Viber) +44(0)3300010342 (Office) www.legalcentre.org

30 August 2019 – Just useful and interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre – Open 7 days a week - www.legalcentre.org – +44(0)3300010342, +44(0)7791145023 (WhatsApp/Viber) >>> Upcoming changes in the UK Visa applications – the insider’s selected report NB: HO = Home Office • There are plans to align fees and service standards in the Marriage & Family visas route. The HO are looking to uniformly standardize the three different stages to Indefinite Leave to Remain in terms of customer offers and time frames. This is planned for late 2019 (potentially October) and will result in a uniform approach which will manage the expectations of the customer • The aim will be to offer next day SPV, 30 day PV and 60 day standard service standards so that the customer group has a clear selection of which to select from. This would ensure fees are aligned to the offer and align standards. Yet this may not be achievable for every country overseas in relation to SPV applications • The marriage and family routes are presently very document heavy. The HO are looking general at document reduction and rationalization in visa applications. They would like to be very clear about what they want, with an emphasis on document quality rather than the quantity. This will help improve decision quality and there is a “culture shift” required to facilitate this. For example, the HO view is that the 1000s of pages of WhatsApp conversations/pictures are unnecessary • In terms of in-country applications, HO are currently working with Sopra Steria to consider asking them not to accept more than 10 photos, but to advise individuals to submit a range of photos over the time period they are trying to demonstrate their relationship. However, they want to make clear that if HO are minded to refuse on this basis as they’re not satisfied the customer meets the relationship rules, they need to give an applicant the opportunity to provide more. This will be a change in approach. They don’t want to rush this through as they are aware this is a big cultural shift • The HO are proposing a pilot where they will make clear document requirements for customers applying at VACs such as only submitting 10 photographs. They are looking for feedback and engagement on this pilot. This will initially be rolled out with a small amount of VFS VACs probably in India and Phillipines, and TLS VACs (location to be confirmed). They will come back to certain stakeholders with more information in the next few weeks as the HO would like to engage extensively with both organizations on the pilot • There are three different streams available now for customers to submit documents through: 1. Free to use self-upload; 2. VAC; 3. Submission of sponsor documentation to the UK centres run by VFS/TLS • The HO IT system is being upgraded to a new system called ATLAS that will lead the decision maker through in a more process driven manner. This will give a more structured decision and lead to efficiencies, and ultimately it is hoped it will improve decision-making. This will be available for decision-makers in the marriage and family team later this year but ultimately it will go across all Home Office casework, including asylum etc. It will also ensure that decisions can be reviewed by management more easily. They are building a base structure that will encapsulate the core checks that are carried out across all categories

Каждый день приносит хорошие новости клиентам Legal Centre Вот и очередная клиентка из России получила ПМЖ на основании ее долгосрочного пребывания в Великобритании под разными иммиграционными категориями. Заявление было не простое – клиентке пришлось несколько раз переделывать и добавлять документы. Я работал с клиенткой по принципу полного сопровождения: https://legalcentre.org/Pomosh.html Результат не заставил себя ждать – заявление рассмотрели в тот же день за 4 часа по принципу Super Premium Service. Я помог десяткам тысяч других клиентов, и я могу помочь Вам. Вы можете записаться на телефонную/online консультацию со мной, Антоном Ковалем, 24 часа в сутки: https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html Антон Коваль Legal Centre +44(0)7791145923 (Mob/WhatsApp/Viber) +44(0)3300010342 (Office) www.legalcentre.org

29 August 2019 – Just useful and interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre – Open 7 days a week - www.legalcentre.org – +44(0)3300010342, +44(0)7791145023 (WhatsApp/Viber) >>> UKVI: Apply for destitution domestic violence (DDV) concession: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/application-for-benefits-for-visa-holder-domestic-violence Form for people on a UK partner visa to claim public funds (benefits) while applying to settle in the UK because of domestic violence. 'Victims of domestic violence (DDV) concession replaced with new version.' >>> UKVI update: visit guidance: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwiN5Pmo3afkAhXPX8AKHa2VDE4QFjAAegQIAhAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.publishing.service.gov.uk%2Fgovernment%2Fuploads%2Fsystem%2Fuploads%2Fattachment_data%2Ffile%2F827480%2FVisit-guidance-v9.0ext.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1KdH6zJhyClYps1AhBKa-4 Updated guidance about the different visitor categories for visiting the UK and how UK Visas and Immigration makes decisions on visitor cases.

Каждый день приносит хорошие новости клиентам Legal Centre Вот еще один клиент из Канады получил супружескую визу по категории Appendix FM Partner (заявление FLR(M)). Я работал с клиентом по принципу полного сопровождения: https://legalcentre.org/Pomosh.html Результат не заставил себя ждать – заявление рассмотрели в тот же день за 4 часа по принципу Super Premium Service. Я помог десяткам тысяч других клиентов, и я могу помочь Вам. Вы можете записаться на телефонную/online консультацию со мной, Антоном Ковалем, 24 часа в сутки: https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html Антон Коваль Legal Centre +44(0)7791145923 (Mob/WhatsApp/Viber) +44(0)3300010342 (Office) www.legalcentre.org

28 August 2019 – Just useful and interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre – Open 7 days a week - www.legalcentre.org – +44(0)3300010342, +44(0)7791145023 (WhatsApp/Viber) >>> Applying for an emergency UK travel document: https://www.gov.uk/emergency-travel-document/how-to-apply How to apply You can apply online. It costs £100 to apply for an emergency travel document. The fee is not refundable. You can pay online as part of your application. If you do not, you’ll be asked to pay over the phone. You might need to attend an appointment at your nearest British embassy, high commission or consulate after you apply online. You’ll be told after you’ve submitted your application whether you need an appointment. You’ll need to give a contact telephone number and email address as part of your application. How long it will take Your emergency travel document will normally be ready 2 working days after you apply. It can take longer, for example if you have: • applied for a child under 16 • not paid or given the right supporting documents • not given enough or correct information You’ll be told after you’ve applied how and when you’ll get your emergency travel document. Apply on behalf of someone else You can apply for an emergency travel document and book an appointment for someone else if they’re a British citizen. They might have to attend an appointment and they must collect their emergency travel document in person. If you apply for a child under 16, they’ll need to attend an appointment. Both parents should go with them if possible. If neither parent can attend, they’ll need to send a signed consent letter. Summary of steps: 1. Apply online for an emergency travel document. It will help immensely if you have a note of your passport details to hand. 2. File a police report within 24 hours. 3. Wait for the email confirming that your travel document has been issued. Don’t book a return flight until you have that confirmation. 4. Bring a copy of the email (electronic is fine) to the nominated embassy or consulate to collect your travel document >>> Guidance - Apply for a UK visa in the USA: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/usa-apply-for-a-uk-visa/apply-for-a-uk-visa-in-the-usa >>> Guidance - Apply for a UK visa in Australia: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/australia-apply-for-a-uk-visa/apply-for-a-uk-visa-in-australia >>> Guidance - Apply for a UK visa in New Zealand: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/new-zealand-apply-for-a-uk-visa/apply-for-a-uk-visa-in-new-zealand

Каждый день приносит хорошие новости клиентам Legal Centre Вот и очередная клиентка из России получила статус постоянного резидента (ILR, Settlement) в Великобритании на основании правила долгого пребывания в этой стране (SET(LR), 10 Year Lawful Residence). Я работал с клиенткой по принципу полного сопровождения: https://legalcentre.org/Pomosh.html Результат не заставил себя ждать – заявление рассмотрели за 24 часа по принципе Super Premium Service. Я помог десяткам тысяч других клиентов, и я могу помочь Вам. Вы можете записаться на телефонную/online консультацию со мной, Антоном Ковалем, 24 часа в сутки: https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html Антон Коваль Legal Centre +44(0)7791145923 (Mob/WhatsApp/Viber) +44(0)3300010342 (Office) www.legalcentre.org

Каждый день приносит хорошие новости клиентам Legal Centre Вот и очередная клиентка из Канады получила ее первую визу жены по категории Appendix FM Partner (виза жены, заявление FLR(M)). Заявление было не простое – клиентке пришлось несколько раз переделывать и добавлять документы. Я работал с клиенткой по принципу полного сопровождения: https://legalcentre.org/Pomosh.html Результат не заставил себя ждать – заявление рассмотрели в тот же день за 4 часа по принципу Super Premium Service. Я помог десяткам тысяч других клиентов, и я могу помочь Вам. Вы можете записаться на телефонную/online консультацию со мной, Антоном Ковалем, 24 часа в сутки: https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html Антон Коваль Legal Centre +44(0)7791145923 (Mob/WhatsApp/Viber) +44(0)3300010342 (Office) www.legalcentre.org

Приветствую, Такие детальные и личные вопросы обычно обсуждаются соответствующим образом здесь: https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html

23 August 2019 – Just useful and interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre – Open 7 days a week - www.legalcentre.org – +44(0)3300010342, +44(0)7791145023 (WhatsApp/Viber) >>> New Innovator visa attracts just four applicants in first three months: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/immigration-statistics-year-ending-june-2019 There have been just four applications for the government’s flagship new visa for overseas entrepreneurs in its first three months of operation. Only four people applied for an Innovator visa between April and June 2019, according to the latest Home Office figures. By contrast, the visa it replaced — Tier 1 (Entrepreneur) — had 1,900 applications in 2018. The figures will raise questions about the design of the Innovator route. Aimed at experienced foreign entrepreneurs who have at least £50,000 in capital behind them, it requires applicants to be endorsed by one of a limited number of business incubators and seed funds. Experts had warned that the design of the Innovator visa scheme is flawed. Issues include the frequent need to participate in a business accelerator programme to secure endorsement; having to give up equity in the start-up; and the “extremely high” bar for getting settlement. The model is perceived as unattractive to the calibre of people who would meet the criteria for an Innovator visa, which include being able to bring their start-up business into international markets. A Freedom of Information response released in May showed that there had been zero Innovator application visas in the first fortnight of the scheme. It has now emerged that only four people applied for entry clearance in the Innovator category between April and June 2019. Two of those applications have been resolved, of which both were granted. In the previous quarter, there were 738 Tier 1 (Entrepreneur) applications. Tier 1 (Entrepreneur) closed to new applicants on 29 March 2019, the same date that the Innovator route went live. While the Home Office has previously said that it expects to grant fewer visas under the new Innovator and Start-up routes than under the schemes they replace, it seems unlikely that applications in single figures would make the cost of designing and administering the route worthwhile. The Start-up visa is off to a slightly better start. It attracted 32 entry clearance applications in its first quarter of operation, of which 25 were decided on and 23 granted. >>> UKVI update: Tier 4 of the points-based system: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwii4a6ezpjkAhWjunEKHel-DYwQFjAAegQIAhAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.publishing.service.gov.uk%2Fgovernment%2Fuploads%2Fsystem%2Fuploads%2Fattachment_data%2Ffile%2F825737%2Ftier-4-guidance-v47.0-ext.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1O8sr4WJx1MRvQkY26QpF9 Guidance for how UK Visas and Immigration considers applications from people to enter or remain in the UK under Tier 4. "Changes from last version of this guidance The key changes to this guidance since it was last published on 10 January 2019 are: • references to UK HEIs have been amended to refer to HEPs (higher education providers) with a track record of compliance, where appropriate, to reflect the additional privileges available to such providers following the HE reforms which have taken effect • guidance regarding sports scholarships has been added to ensure these are accepted and not considered to be a breach of the definition of working as a ‘professional sportsperson’ which refers to receiving payment, including payment in kind • guidance regarding sports-related work placements has been added to clarify what activity Tier 4 students are permitted to undertake" >>> UKVI update: Short-term students guidance: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwix2bDKzpjkAhXHVRUIHetYAEQQFjAAegQIARAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.publishing.service.gov.uk%2Fgovernment%2Fuploads%2Fsystem%2Fuploads%2Fattachment_data%2Ffile%2F826915%2Fshort-term-students-v11.0ext.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1L7QOyEKg60kFOEVkWoy8F Guidance on how short-term student applications for entry clearance or leave to enter are considered. "Changes from last version of this guidance Additions have been made to reflect the expansion of ePassport gate eligibility to seven additional nationalities on Monday 20 May 2019. ... B5JSSK Nationals Visitors and entry clearance holders who are nationals of Australia, Canada, Japan, New Zealand, Singapore, South Korea, and the United States of America (B5JSSK) are able to use ePassport gates to enter the UK. If a national of one of these countries does not hold an entry clearance and wishes to seek entry as a Short Term Student they must see a Border Force officer and cannot use the ePassport gates." >>> Government can be liable for costs in Cart type judicial review cases: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2019/151.html The Court of Appeal has held that the UK government can be asked to pay expenses where a judicial review has been brought against the Upper Tribunal’s refusal to grant permission to appeal. The test case of Faqiri v Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) [2019] EWCA Civ 151 has only recently been published on Bailli but it makes for interesting reading. To understand why this was such an important case, let’s look at how cases get to the point of judicial review proceedings against the Upper Tribunal. Immigration appeals typically start life in the First-tier Tribunal. If refused, an appeal to the Upper Tribunal is not automatic. Instead, appellants get two bites at the cherry with a chance to apply first to the First-tier Tribunal for permission to appeal, and, if refused, then directly to the Upper Tribunal. If permission is refused at the Upper Tribunal stage, an appellant becomes “appeal rights exhausted”: there is no statutory right of further appeal. In a small amount of cases, it is possible to apply for judicial review against the Upper Tribunal’s decision to refuse permission to appeal. In those cases, the courts apply the “second appeals test” which empowers courts to allow such cases to be brought if satisfied: 1. that the proposed appeal would raise some important point of principle or practice, or 2. that there is some other compelling reason for the relevant appellate court to hear the appeal So, where this Cart type of judicial review is brought, the respondent is always the Upper Tribunal because it is the Upper Tribunal’s decision which is being challenged. Inevitably, however, the Home Office appears as an interested party backing the tribunal. That is because it will ultimately be the Home Office opposing these appeals in the tribunals below and incurring expense and time if they are sent back there. In the Faqiri case, the High Court had quashed the decision of the Upper Tribunal but did not award costs against the Upper Tribunal. Instead, the court made a limited costs order against the Home Office. The appellant’s primary case was that costs should have been awarded against the Upper Tribunal. Lord Justice Hickinbottom was unimpressed, saying: “The driving force behind the proposition in Davies and Gudanaviciene – that a court or tribunal should not be liable for the costs of a judicial review which seeks to challenge one of its decisions, if the court or tribunal does not act improperly and takes no active part in the proceedings – is the important principle of judicial immunity. That principle applies equally to decisions challenged by way of Cart claims as any judicial review of the decision of a court or tribunal” The next argument was that the Home Office should have borne the full costs of the judicial review procedure because it was, after all, the real opponent all along. The Secretary of State cross-appealed on the basis that she did not participate in the judicial review proceedings, was not the “unsuccessful party” and did not cause any additional expense in the judicial review proceedings. The Court of Appeal hit the nail on the head in saying: “… the right that the Appellant is in reality seeking to vindicate is not his right to pursue an appeal in the UT, but his right to asylum, which the Secretary of State denied by his refusal of the Appellant’s claim for asylum. Given that there is no right of appeal or review in respect of the UT’s refusal of permission to appeal to it, to vindicate that right the Appellant was bound to commence judicial review proceedings. In my view, those proceedings cannot be viewed – as Mr Joseph urges – in isolation. They have been brought to enable the Appellant to proceed with his appeal to the UT, and only for that purpose.” Hickinbottom LJ noted that the “protagonist” in the appeal was the Secretary of State, and the point of the judicial review to vindicate Mr Faqiri’s right to asylum. " He went on: "Perhaps that is a principled basis for an order in the judicial review that may result in the Secretary of State bearing some of the claimant’s costs, even though he played no active part in the claim. Even if, in these circumstances, the Secretary of State might not usually be described as “the unsuccessful party”. This decision seems likely to force Ms Patel to dig deep into her pockets. Whilst it is true that the number of successful Cart claims is small, the cost associated with judicial review proceedings can be astronomical, especially in Scotland where we have ridiculously extravagant court fees. As an example, it will cost you the princely sum of £418 per hour for a court hearing if you’re not funded by legal aid. If the Home Office does now have to think carefully about the potential for being held liable for costs at the judicial review stage, it may have to spend a bit more time scrutinising applications for permission to appeal to see whether there is indeed any merit in conceding cases.

Каждый день приносит хорошие новости клиентам Legal Centre Вот и очередная клиентка из Белоруссии получил ПМЖ (ILR/Settlement) как беженец в Великобритании по категории SET(P). Заявление было не простое – клиенту пришлось несколько раз переделывать и добавлять документы. Я работал с клиентом по принципу общего сопровождения: https://legalcentre.org/Obshee-soprovozdenie.html Результат не заставил себя ждать – заявление рассмотрели в стандартные сроки. Я помог десяткам тысяч других клиентов, и я могу помочь Вам. Вы можете записаться на телефонную/online консультацию со мной, Антоном Ковалем, 24 часа в сутки: https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html Антон Коваль Legal Centre +44(0)7791145923 (Mob/WhatsApp/Viber) +44(0)3300010342 (Office) www.legalcentre.org

22 August 2019 – Just useful and interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre – Open 7 days a week - www.legalcentre.org – +44(0)3300010342, +44(0)7791145023 (WhatsApp/Viber) >>> Migrants working illegally still have employment rights: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2019/1393.html The case of Okedina v Chikale [2019] EWCA Civ 139a3 had been making its way through the courts for some time. In 2013, Ms Okedina arranged for Ms Chikale to move to the UK as her live-in domestic worker and organised her UK visa. To cut a long story short, Ms Okedina failed to renew the visa and failed to let Ms Chikale know that. Eventually the relationship broke down and Ms Chikale claimed compensation in respect of various employment law breaches, including unfair and wrongful dismissal, race discrimination and unlawful deductions from wages. Ms Okedina’s position was that Ms Chikale was not entitled to any of this because she had been working in breach of UK immigration laws — the “illegality defence”. This argument failed in the Employment Tribunal, the Employment Appeal Tribunal and, most recently, in the Court of Appeal. Lord Justice Underhill noted that there was no public policy reason why the relevant legislation should interpreted to support Ms Okedina, pointing out that genuine mistakes over immigration status are not necessarily unreasonable: “...some aspects of the relevant rules are complicated or unclear, and wrong advice can be given, sometimes by the Home Office itself. In short, not all cases of illegal working involve culpability on the part of the employee.” This case was pretty unusual. Not only was Ms Chikale oblivious to the fact that she was working without immigration permission, but it was alleged that Ms Okedina had submitted false information in the documents she had prepared for Ms Chikale and had forged her signature. Abnormal as the case may be, what it shows is that the overlap between immigration law and employment law is in no way clear cut. Lacking immigration status does not mean that an employment contract is unenforceable. Whilst immigration experts will usually be well-equipped to provide advice on factual points — if a person has leave, whether they have protection under Section 3C or not (and to educate all parties on what that means), etc — it is important to avoid making statements on the legality of the contract of employment (unless you happen to be an expert on employment law also).

Каждый день приносит хорошие новости клиентам Legal Centre Вот и очередная клиентка из России получила ПМЖ (ILR-Settlement) по категории Long Residence - SET(LR). Я работал с клиенткой по принципу общего сопровождения: https://legalcentre.org/Pomosh.html Результат не заставил себя ждать – заявление рассмотрели за 24 часа по принципу Super Premium Service. Я помог десяткам тысяч других клиентов, и я могу помочь Вам. Вы можете записаться на телефонную/online консультацию со мной, Антоном Ковалем, 24 часа в сутки: https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html Антон Коваль Legal Centre +44(0)7791145923 (Mob/WhatsApp/Viber) +44(0)3300010342 (Office) www.legalcentre.org

Каждый день приносит хорошие новости клиентам Legal Centre Сегодня получили одобрение заявления клиента из Вьетнама на получение ILR по категории Tier 2 (General). Я работал с этим клиентом по принципу общего сопровождения: https://legalcentre.org/Obshee-soprovozdenie.html Заявление рассмотрели за 4 часа по принципу Super Premium Service. Я помог десяткам тысяч других клиентов, и я могу помочь Вам. Вы можете записаться на телефонную/online консультацию со мной, Антоном Ковалем, 24 часа в сутки: https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html Антон Коваль Legal Centre +44(0)7791145923 (Mob/WhatsApp/Viber) +44(0)3300010342 (Office) www.legalcentre.org

20 August 2019 – Just useful and interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre – Open 7 days a week - www.legalcentre.org – +44(0)3300010342, +44(0)7791145023 (WhatsApp/Viber) >>> Online asylum appeals to be rolled out nationwide in 2020 Asylum appeals will be filed and managed entirely online from next year, the courts and tribunals service for England and Wales has said. HMCTS told Free Movement that it plans to roll out its “reformed digital asylum service” to all hearing centres at the end of January 2020. The digital appeal system aims to make the process of challenging an asylum system more efficient and less paper-bound. The focus is on electronic document upload, digitised case management and early online resolution rather than the final hearing being on a webcam, although HMCTS is also experimenting with virtual hearings throughout the tribunal system. Outlining the system in a recent update on its work, HMCTS said that “appeals will be submitted electronically by legal representatives and will be received instantaneously by both HMCTS and the Home Office. The appeals will then progress digitally via the on line service from initial application, through to hearing and judicial decision”. It adds that the new system will “enable cases to be resolved online where that is appropriate, as well as supporting the use of video and face-to-face hearings”. Digital asylum appeals are currently being piloted at Manchester and Taylor House hearing centres. Six solicitors’ firms are involved. The pilot will be expanded to Bradford and Newport in September 2019, and further rolled out to Birmingham and Hatton Cross by the end of the year. The national rollout that follows will only be for cases where the appellant has legal representation. HMCTS says that a separate service is being designed for unrepresented appellants, which will begin pilot testing early in 2020. Other areas of immigration and asylum law may be digitised further down the line. The HMCTS annual report notes that “we have plans to continue to research and design other appeals processes including bail”.

Приветствую, 1. Не обязательно, но можете 2. Лучше сделать

Каждый день приносит хорошие новости клиентам Legal Centre Вот и очередная клиентка из России получила ПМЖ (ILR/Settlement) как жена гражданина Великобритании. Я помог этой клиентке приехать в Великобританию, продлить ее визу и вот теперь - получить ПМЖ по принципу полного сопровождения: https://legalcentre.org/Pomosh.html Результат не заставил себя ждать – заявление рассмотрели за 24 часа по принципу Super Premium Service - и вот уже получена свежая BRP ILR карточка. Я помог десяткам тысяч других клиентов, и я могу помочь Вам. Вы можете записаться на телефонную/online консультацию со мной, Антоном Ковалем, 24 часа в сутки: https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html Антон Коваль Legal Centre +44(0)7791145923 (Mob/WhatsApp/Viber) +44(0)3300010342 (Office) www.legalcentre.org Каждый день приносит хорошие новости клиентам Legal Centre Вот и очередная клиентка из России получила ПМЖ (ILR/Settlement) как жена гражданина Великобритании. Я помог этой клиентке приехать в Великобританию, продлить ее визу и вот теперь - получить ПМЖ по принципу полного сопровождения: https://legalcentre.org/Pomosh.html Результат не заставил себя ждать – заявление рассмотрели за 24 часа по принципу Super Premium Service - и вот уже получена свежая BRP ILR карточка. Я помог десяткам тысяч других клиентов, и я могу помочь Вам. Вы можете записаться на телефонную/online консультацию со мной, Антоном Ковалем, 24 часа в сутки: https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html Антон Коваль Legal Centre +44(0)7791145923 (Mob/WhatsApp/Viber) +44(0)3300010342 (Office) www.legalcentre.org

16 August 2019 – Just useful and interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre – Open 7 days a week - www.legalcentre.org – +44(0)3300010342, +44(0)7791145023 (WhatsApp/Viber) >>> The NHS Surcharge – UK BA – what you need to know: https://www.gov.uk/healthcare-immigration-application/refunds >>> Asylum seeker not “effeminate” enough to be gay, immigration judge says An immigration judge has rejected an asylum seeker’s claim to be gay, saying that the man did not come across as “effeminate” enough to be credible. According to a lawyer involved in the case, the judge wrote that the man did not have a gay “demeanour” and did not “look around the room in an effeminate manner”. The judge reportedly went on to say that “on the gay scene younger men are highly valued”. Statistically, 33% of asylum appeals based on sexual orientation were successful in 2017. That was below the average for all asylum appeals, which was 40% that year, although the statistics are experimental and should be interpreted with caution.

Каждый день приносит хорошие новости клиентам Legal Centre Вот и очередная клиентка из Белоруссии получила ПМЖ как жена гражданина Британии. До этого я помогал ее мужу стать британцем (въез-продление-ПМЖ-гражданство), вот теперь и эта клиентка прошла тот же путь: въез-продление-ПМЖ. Я работал с клиенткой по принципу стандартного ведения ее дела, т.е. т.н. full representation: https://legalcentre.org/Pomosh.html Результат не заставил себя ждать – заявление рассмотрели за 24 часа по принципу Super Premium Service. Я помог десяткам тысяч других клиентов, и я могу помочь Вам. Вы можете записаться на телефонную/online консультацию со мной, Антоном Ковалем, 24 часа в сутки: https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html Антон Коваль Legal Centre +44(0)7791145923 (Mob/WhatsApp/Viber) +44(0)3300010342 (Office) www.legalcentre.org

Апостиль в UK вообще не знают, что это. То есть да, не нужен. А вот перевод рекомендую делать в агентстве, т.к. такой перевод нотариально заверять не нужно обычно, т.к. как перевод из агентства обычно выполняется на фирменном бланке. "Нотариально заверенный перевод" - это когда перевод делается переводчиком не из агентства (индивидуал), и его подпись заверяется нотариусом. Обычно переводы в большинстве случаев "косые" из Украины, России и т.п. Часто встречаю название страны Великобритания в переводе на английском как Great Britain. "У нас так не говорят". Я могу заверить перевод как британский адвокат с дополнительной лицензией сертифицированного переводчика высокого уровня (MCIL).

15 August 2019 – Just useful and interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre – Open 7 days a week - www.legalcentre.org – +44(0)3300010342, +44(0)7791145023 (WhatsApp/Viber) >>> You can still rely upon both the Appendix FM and EEA Regulations, until Brexit ! For example, if you are a dual EEA/British national. That is, you arrived into the UK as an EEA national, got your Permanent residence in due time and then became a British citizen. Then you brought your partner into the UK under the Appendix FM (“UK spouse visa”). Until Brexit it is, therefore, possible, for your partner, to apply for a 5-year EEA Residence Card under the EEA Regulations prior to 31/10/2019. Should an application be submitted under the EEA Regulations, the partner’s 30-month spouse visa will be concurrently valid with the Residence Card under the EEA Regulations. >>> UKVI update: Guidance on deciding applications for people to enter or remain in the UK as a Tier 2 migrant: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjrwdXewITkAhVSxoUKHc4iCsQQFjAAegQIAhAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.publishing.service.gov.uk%2Fgovernment%2Fuploads%2Fsystem%2Fuploads%2Fattachment_data%2Ffile%2F825246%2Ftier-2-v33.0.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0NxB3M6Y3uVsH8__J7-UYU Guidance on deciding applications for people to enter or remain in the UK as a Tier 2 migrant. Changes from last version of this guidance This version replaces the Tier 2 modernised guidance version 32.0 which has been withdrawn and archived. It has been updated following the higher education regulatory reforms which established the Office for Students (OfS) as the regulatory body for English higher education providers. The OfS regulatory framework came into force fully on 01 August 2019. >>> Updating certificates of sponsorship following demergers and TUPE transfers The UK BA Business Help Desk confirms that it is not necessary to report against a certificate of sponsorship under 'sponsor has stopped sponsoring migrant' when there is a TUPE/demerger as long as the necessary updates are made elsewhere.

14 August 2019 – Just useful and interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre – Open 7 days a week - www.legalcentre.org – +44(0)3300010342, +44(0)7791145023 (WhatsApp/Viber) >>> No-deal Brexit notice; commentary on the Immigration (European Economic Area) (Amendment) Regulations 2019 Note on the implications of a no-deal Brexit for Europeans With the prospect of a no-deal Brexit now looking like a more realistic possibility, the EU citizens and their family members may wish to note the following. EU Settlement Scheme deadlines in a no deal situation The Department for Exiting the EU (DExEU) have stated that different deadlines for the EU Settlement Scheme will be applicable in a no-deal situation as compared with under a deal. These deadlines appear to have been adopted by the Home Office in its webpages on settled status applications. • EU citizens intending to be a main applicant under the scheme must enter the UK by 31 October 2019. The Government documents are silent on the time of day an applicant must be in the UK before Brexit. Nonetheless, the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (Exit Day) (Amendment) (No. 2) Regulations 2019 and the definition of ‘specified date’ in the Immigration Rules, Appendix EU define Brexit day as 11pm on 31 October 2019. Therefore the applicants should be aware that this potentially stricter deadline exists and may eventually be relied on by the Home Office. • The main closure date for the EU Settlement Scheme for applicants (including both EU nationals and family members) living in the UK by 31 October 2019 will be 31 December 2020 instead of the deadline of 30 June 2021 which applies in the event of a deal. • Spouses, partners, children, parents and grandparents (and possibly other dependent family members) who have a relationship with the EU national by 31 October 2019 and are living abroad on that date (and children born abroad after 31 October 2019) will need to apply under the EU Settlement Scheme by 29 March 2022 and must continue to have the re-lationship at the date of application – applications made after 29 March 2022 must meet the UK Immigration Rules outside the scheme. • Spouses, partners and other dependent relatives who establish a relationship after 31 October 2019 with an EU citizen who has status under the scheme will be eligible to apply under the scheme until 31 December 2020 – applications made after 31 December 2020 must meet the Immigration Rules outside the scheme. In order to be eligible under the EU Settlement Scheme, durable partners (with an exception for those applying from outside the UK) and dependent relatives (other than dependent parents) must also have been issued with a family permit or residence card under the EEA Regulations (or equivalent document/evidence issued by the Islands) by 31 October 2019. Status of the policy The drafting of the DExEU policy paper on citizens' rights in the event of a no deal Brexit is high-level and imprecise. The details of exactly which family members are covered is not clear. For example, it is not clear whether “partners” applies to both civil partners and durable partners. It is also not clear what the policy is intended to be for Surinder Singh family members or for the family members of individuals who have EU citizenship, have naturalised as a British citizen following the exercise of treaty rights in the UK and who continue to exercise treaty rights afterwards (i.e. those captured under the decision in Lounes). Furthermore, it is important to note the policy in relation to no deal is not protected by any international agreement. This means that the government may be free to change the details at some later date. Such changes would of course be subject to ordinary public law principles. EEA/EFTA nationals The document was also originally published on 6 December 2018, before the UK concluded citizens’ rights agreements with the EEA/EFTA states (Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland) and has not been updated for that development. It was updated on 28 March 2019, but only to ‘reflect that the UK will not leave the EU on 29 March 2019 and to clarify that the family reunion policy applies to EU citizens with pre-settled and settled status.’ However, the agreements with the EEA/EFTA states appear to mirror the DExEU policy but with greater detail and with the protection given by an international agreement. European nationals arriving after 31 October 2019 As a further reminder, in the event of no deal a transitional period will apply after exit until 31 December 2020 to newly arriving EEA/Swiss nationals and their family members. The key points are: • EU nationals who have not established residence in the UK before 31 October 2019 will be able to enter the UK for three months. If they wish to stay beyond this period, they will need to apply for European temporary leave to remain. • European temporary leave to remain will be granted for a period of three years, calculated from the date of application. There will be no possibility of renewing this period or of apply-ing for indefinite leave to remain on the basis of this status alone. EU nationals who wish to stay beyond three years will have to find an alternative route under the Immigration Rules. • EU nationals may be joined by close family members (defined as spouse, partner or dependent children aged under 18) who are third country nationals. However, third country national family members who wish to accompany an EU national under these arrangements will need to apply in advance for a family permit. • These rules apply to nationals from the EEA/EFTA states. >>> UKVI Guidance: Registration as a British citizen: children of British parents: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/children-of-british-parents-nationality-policy-guidance Updated guidance document published. Removed references to the good character require-ment following the British Nationality Act 1981 (Remedial) Order 2019. >>> UKVI update: addition to Shortage Occupation List consultation response: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/shortage-occupation-list-2018-call-for-evidence UKVI has added the Food and Drink Federation’s submission to the Shortage Occupation List consultation responses document

Приветствую. 1. Оплачивается во время подачи online анкеты. 2. https://www.gov.uk/healthcare-immigration-application