British Lawyer

+1...... Встечал случаи, когда давали визу на срок после окончания паспорта и так же встречал случаи, когда заявлялась виза на 5 лет, паспорт заканчивался через 3 года, и визу дали на 2 года. Есть риск, т.е. 50/50.

14-10-2016 UK & EEA Immigration Law Updates from the Legal Centre, <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/Initial-Consultation.html</noindex> “We can help you” Most recent case-law •Al – Sirri (Asylum – Exclusion – Article 1F©) [2016] UKUT 00448 (IAC) In every case involving exclusion of protection under Article 1F of the Refugee Convention, the onus of proof is on the Secretary of State, a detailed and individualised examination of the facts is required, there must be clear and credible evidence of the offending conduct, and the overall evaluative judgment involves the application of a standard higher than suspicion or belief. •Restivo (EEA – prisoner transfer) [2016] UKUT 00449(IAC) The European Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA has replaced the framework previously set out in the Council of Europe Convention on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons, itself supplemented by the Protocol of 18 December 1997, to provide the framework within which a request may be made to another Member State for the transfer of an EEA national sentenced in the United Kingdom to serve that sentence in his own country. In the United Kingdom context, it is a precondition for making a transfer request that there be in place a deportation order. A decision to make a deportation order is not a decision to transfer a serving prisoner to another Member State to serve his prison there and so in any appeal against a decision to make a deportation order the Tribunal is not concerned with whether there is any legal impediment to such a transfer taking place. Where the personal conduct of a person represents a genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat affecting one of the fundamental interests of society, the fact that such threat is managed while that person serves his or her prison sentence is not itself material to the assessment of the threat he or she poses. The threat exists, whether or not it cannot generate further offending simply because the person concerned, being imprisoned, has significantly less opportunity to commit further criminal offences. •AB (British citizenship: deprivation; Deliallisi considered) Nigeria [2016] UKUT 00451 (IAC) (1) As held in Deliallisi (British citizen: deprivation appeal: scope) [2013] UKUT 00439 (IAC), in an appeal under section 40A of the British Nationality Act 1981 the Tribunal is required to determine the reasonably foreseeable consequences of deprivation. (2) Whilst the Tribunal considering a section 40A appeal cannot pre-judge the outcome of any future legal challenge that the appellant might bring against a decision to remove, following deprivation, the Tribunal must nevertheless take a view as to whether, from its present vantage point, there is likely to be force in any future challenge: cf section 94 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 and paragraph 353 of the immigration rules. The stronger the potential case, the less likely it will be that the reasonably foreseeable consequences of deprivation will include removal. (3) A person who had indefinite leave to remain in the United Kingdom, immediately before acquiring British citizenship, does not thereby become entitled to indefinite leave to remain, upon being deprived of such citizenship under section 40 of the 1981 Act. Leave to remain is effectively extinguished by becoming a British citizen, since the system of controls under the Immigration Act 1971 does not apply to British citizens. (4) In a section 40A appeal, an appellant may rely on the ground that deprivation would have a disproportionate effect, as regards the rights flowing from citizenship of the EU, only if, on the facts, there is a “cross-border” element. The finding to the contrary in Deliallisi was reached per incuriam in the judgment of the Court of Appeal in G1 v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 867. •R (on the application of Hassan and Another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Dublin – Malta; Charter Art 18) IJR [2016] UKUT 00452 (IAC) (i) There have been significant developments in Malta during recent years. While there may be imperfections in the Maltese asylum decision making processes, these are not sufficient to preclude returns under the Dublin Regulation and, in particular, do not amount to a breach of Article 18 of the EU Charter. (ii) While Article 18 of the EU Charter confers rights of a procedural nature, the evidence does not establish that these will be infringed in the event of either of the Applicants pursuing a fresh asylum claim in Malta. (iii) The limitations of the mechanisms available under Maltese law for challenging refusal of asylum decisions do not infringe Article 18 of the EU Charter. (iv) In judicial review, decisions of the Administrative Court are not binding on the Upper Tribunal: Secretary of State for Justice v RB [2010] UKUT 454 (AAC) applied. (v) Per curiam: Article 18 of the EU Charter provides an avenue for challenging transfer decisions under the Dublin Regulation. (vi) Per curiam: Where a Dublin Regulation transfer decision is challenged under Article 18 of the EU Charter, the ECHR “flagrant breach” standard does not apply. Rather, the test is whether there is a real risk of a breach of Article 18 •MA (ETS – TOEIC testing) [2016] UKUT 00450(IAC) (i) The question of whether a person engaged in fraud in procuring a TOEIC English language proficiency qualification will invariably be intrinsically fact sensitive. (ii) Per curiam: where the voice data generated by TOEIC testing are those of a person other than the person claiming to have undergone the tests, there is no breach of EU or UK data protection laws.

Если у ребенка в BRP написано "no recourse to public funds" - сложите "2+2".

Приветствую, Такой ссылки быть не может, т.к. ситуация у каждого разная. Я могу <noindex>детально проконсультировать Вас</noindex> и объяснить, как лучше поступить в Вашей ситуации.

Из недавних заявление клиентов: - EEAPR: рассмотрели и получили Permanent Residence "blue card" за 5 месяцев (EU citizen) - EEAFM: рассмотрели и получили BRP на 5 лет за 6 месяцев (self-sufficiency)

13-10-2016 UK & EEA Immigration Law Updates from the Legal Centre, <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/Initial-Consultation.html</noindex> “We can help you” •Ministry of Justice Consultation: Expedited immigration and asylum appeals for detained appellants, 12 October 2016: <noindex>https://consult.justice.gov.uk/digital-comm...ned-appellants/</noindex> •If one’s EEA application is refused and the one appeals, the one can request the UK BA to issue an additional Certificate of Application (with the right of employment for certain categories) while appeal is pending •The House of Lords Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee met on 11 October and has agreed its 9th Report. First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Fees (Amendment) Order 2016 (SI 2016/928) These Regulations introduce an approximately six-fold increase in the fees for an application to the Immigration and Asylum Chamber of the First-tier Tribunal raising them to £490 for a decision on papers and £800 for an oral hearing. Fees for an application to the Upper Tribunal will also be introduced by a subsequent order. Of the 147 responses to the consultation on this proposal, 142 respondents disagreed with the proposed fee increase on the ground that it would deny access to justice. It seems as poor practice that the instrument was laid on the last day before the recess and came into effect on the date Parliament returned, thus allowing no time for scrutiny or comment before the Order’s provisions were applied. This Order is drawn to the special attention of the House on the ground that it gives rise to issues of public policy likely to be of interest to the House. <noindex>http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/l...leg/46/4602.htm</noindex> •Justice Committee, House of Commons Select Committee inquiry into the implications of Brexit for the justice system, 12 October 2016: <noindex>http://www.parliament.uk/business/committe...y-launch-16-17/</noindex>

На ребенка-британца ? Это обычно автоматически. Не ребенка-иммигранта - обычно нельзя по UK Immigration Law и позвожно по EEA law. Мало данных. Уточните, кто есть кто в плане гражданства/иммиграционного статуса.

Пожалуйста. Рад был помочь.

Првиетствую, До 08-07-2012 такой вариант (мин 4 года вместе проживания за рубежем) засчитывался, и клиенты получали т.н. Indefinite Leave to ENTER (ILE). С июля 2012 это уже не работает. Нужно будет прожить в UK и выполить необходимые требования Appendix FM/Chapter 8 on the UK BA web site: <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...-family-members</noindex> Вам нужно будет получать "визу жены".

Если Вы имеете в виду, сообщать ли в UK BA об изменении адреса ПОСЛЕ получения карты резидента, то ответ "не нужно".

Приветствую, Итак: Первый раз делаю приглашение в гости. Для мамы. Все перечитала, но вопросы все равно есть, помогите пожалуйста. 1. Можно ли отправить отсканированные копии документов, или все же надо обязательно слать оригиналы? Я не доеду до Лондона, чтобы отправить водителями. Или слать в Лондон по почте ( включая моё свидетельство о рождении) а они пусть уже везут в Украину? DHL стоит недёшево. - Вчера отправлял клиенту в московскую область пакет документов, до 500 г. Обошлось около 38 фунтов. Финансовые документы долюны быт оригиналы. Остальные - в зависимости от того, что Вы доказываете. Паспорта могут быть копии, т.к. паспорта нужны Вам в UK. Свидетельство о рождении - если есть возможность, приложите оригинал. 2. Папа не едет, остаётся дома, он ещё работает. Прикладывать ли его пенсионное свидетельство и выписки к маминым, как доказательство их общих доходов? - Да 3. Нужно ли их свидетельство о браке? ( извиняюсь, если это очевидно, я просто анкету все ещё заполняю, там с мамиными шенгенами у нас заминка, но мама уже часть справок сделала, так что пытаемся все одновременно делать). - Нужно 4. Нужен ли перевод родительских банковских выписок (там же почти одни цифры) - Нужен 5. Подавал ли кто то на гостевую визу пенсионерам, не предоставляя привязок в виде права собственности на жильё. В нашем случае это договор дарения, замучаюсь переводить. - Рекомендую приложить. 6. Мы маму спонсируем. Вычитала на другом форуме, что нужно рассчитывать где то £175 в неделю. Это официально? Или можно меньше писать, чтобы к нашим финансам не цеплялись. А то скажут ещё что наших средств недостаточно - Можете меньше, все зависит от того что и как Вы пишите в сопроводительном письме. То есть, что она будет делать в UK. Если просто побудет с Вами без самостоятельных поездок по UK - сумма в полне достаточная. Спасибо заранее! - Пожалуйста.

12-10-2016 UK & EEA Immigration Law Updates from the Legal Centre, <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/Initial-Consultation.html</noindex> “We can help you” •The republic of Ireland citizens are automatically deemed to be "settled" in the United Kingdom on the basis of the section 1(3) of the Immigration Act 1971 •Contact details for immigration compliance and enforcement teams: <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...forcement-teams</noindex>

Разумеется. Требование выполнить условия по т.н. maintenance так же есть.

+1..... Просто укажите 2 гражданства.

И Вам всего хорошего.

На основании EEA Regulations non-EEA члены семей EEA не должны регистрирорваться в полиции. UK BA как всегда всю информацию перемешал.

10-10-2016 UK & EEA Immigration Law Updates from the Legal Centre, <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/Initial-Consultation.html</noindex> “We can help you” •A child born outside the UK to a parent who has ILR is not a British Citizen. In other words because the parent with the ILR is not a British citizen, the child cannot benefit from s3 (3) or (5) of the BNA 1981 •New Immigration Fees The First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Fees (Amendment) Order 2016 (SI 2016/928 (L.16)) came into effect today. It introduces massive fee increases in immigration and asylum cases. The fee payable for an application to the First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) for a decision on the papers rises from £80 to £490. The fee for an oral hearing rises from £140 to £800. The amendments apply only in respect of an appeal to the First-tier Tribunal against a decision taken on or after today •Online versions of the FLR(M) and FLR(FP) application forms are now available. The form needs to be printed at the end and sent off to the Home Office with the required supporting documents: <noindex>https://visas-immigration.service.gov.uk/pr...t/family-routes</noindex>

Чеком платить - самое надежное, т.к. не бывает "сбоя" как с карточками - банк не разрешил снять деньги и т.п. 4 месяца для биометрики - однозначно что-то не то. Обычно приглашение на биометрику приходит через 2-3 недели. На форуме я не раз давал ссылку на E-mail, по которому можно запросить дубликат присьма на биометрику. Отсутствие снятия денег и отсутствие приглашения на биометрику = плохой признак, увы.

Пожалуйста, Рал был помочь.

Тем кто продляет визы по категории FLRM - обратите внимание, что для продления уже нужен уровент теста A2.

30-10-2016 UK & EEA Immigration Law Updates from the Legal Centre, <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/Initial-Consultation.html</noindex> «We can help you» •In two linked cases, CS v UK C-304/14 and Marin v Spain C-165/14, the Court of Justice of the European Union has ruled that Zambran0-like derived rights of residence under EU law are not automatically lost if a crime is committed. Instead, each case must be assessed on its merits and a judgment reached applying normal principles of EU law •Access to the Court of Appeal is being restricted with effect from 3 October 2016 by means of important changes to the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) The headline changes are: -Removal of the automatic right to an oral hearing when renewing an unsuccessful application for permission to appeal. Renewed applications will be determined on the papers, but a judge can exceptionally direct an oral hearing. - The test for permission on second appeals is re-worded to require “a real prospect of success” (in addition to an important point of principle or practice). - New seven day time limit for appeals from refusals of permission to apply for judicial review by the Upper Tribunal. •No appeal to Court of Appeal until Upper Tribunal appeal concluded The Upper Tribunal has ruled that there is no right of appeal to the Court of Appeal against decisions of the Upper Tribunal until Upper Tribunal appeal is finally concluded. This means there is no right of appeal to the Court of Appeal against an Upper Tribunal decision that there was or was not an error of law committed by the First-tier Tribunal. •Fresh claims pay theoretically generate right of appeal after all Two further cases have added to the jurisprudence on whether it is possible under the Immigration Act 2014 to appeal against a refusal of a fresh protection claim. The cases are R (on the application of Sharif Hussein) v First-Tier Tribunal (para 353: present scope and effect) IJR [2016] UKUT 409 (IAC) and Sheidu (Further submissions; appealable decision) [2016] UKUT 412 (IAC).

Примите мои поздравления

Около Welshpool, Powys, Wales.

Лучше никак, т.к. уже много-много лет у UK BA стандартный срок рассмотрения EEA2/EEAFM - в течение 6 месяецев. Если что-то срочное нужно, то тогда они просят им писать. У одной клиентки мама умерла, так они за 2 дня рассмотрели и прислали документы. Но это было в 2013 году. Недавно просили UK BA ускорить рассмотрение дела клиенти т.к. в октябре поездка на выставку по работе. UK BA ответил, ссылаясь на case-law, что такая причина не позволяет им рассмотреть заявление быстрее, чем у других.

Моментов может быть много. Общие ответы Вы уже получили. Конкретно по Вашей ситуации и исходят из Ваших документов в отношении подобных успешных дел - <noindex>здесь</noindex>.