British Lawyer

Моим клиентам просто пришло приглашение заплатить сначала за одного ребенка, а потом на следующий день - за другого. Это верный признак того, что визы выдадут. И от обратного....

09 October 2017 - Useful Immigration News from the Immigration Lawyers who can help you - www.legalcentre.org - Ph: 0330 001 0342 or 07791145923 • Home Office in breach of law over permanent residence waiting times The Home Office has broken the law by failing to publish the waiting times faced by EU citizens trying to get residence documents. The Information Commissioner ruled that Amber Rudd’s department is in breach of the Freedom of Information Act, having sat on the request for seven months and counting. • The Council of Europe Agreement on the transfer of refugee status can be found here : <noindex>https://rm.coe.int/1680078b0d</noindex> and the current interim UK BA instructions can be found here : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...-notice-process</noindex> • Appendix T on the Tuberculosis (TB) screening requirements for the UK immigration applications can be found here : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/guidance/immigration-rul...losis-screening</noindex> • Tribunal criticizes government lawyers for “trench warfare” mentality and “inappropriate” conduct : <noindex>http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/IAC/2017/372.html</noindex> In one of his final judgments as outgoing President, Mr Justice McCloskey launched a bitter broadside at the conduct of government lawyers in long-running litigation over the entry of refugee children. While the criticism of the solicitors at the Government Legal Department and of previous barristers instructed for the Home Office is robust and unambiguous, the background is hard to discern from the judgment itself, which arises essentially as satellite litigation around the failure of the Home Office to comply with previous orders made by the tribunal. The case is R (on the application of AM and others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (liberty to apply – scope – discharging mandatory orders) [2017] UKUT 372 (IAC). • Hospital orders and deportation : <noindex>http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2017/1382.html</noindex> In Secretary of State for the Home Department v KE (Nigeria) [2017] EWCA Civ 382, the Court of Appeal tackled the narrow, but important, issue as to whether a non-British citizen who is convicted and sentenced to a hospital order with restrictions under sections 37 and 41 of the Mental Health Act 1983 is “a foreign criminal who has been sentenced to a period of imprisonment of at least four years” for the purposes of section 117C(6) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002, so that the public interest requires his deportation unless there are very compelling circumstances that mean that it would be a disproportionate interference with his rights under article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights… to deport him. The case is also a good example of what can be considered “very compelling circumstances” in deportation cases. • Permanent residence through incapacity to work: no UK derogation : <noindex>http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2017/360.html</noindex> The claimant in SSWP v NZ (ESA) [2017] UKUT 0360 (AAC) is a Polish national who worked in a chip shop. On 4 September 2017, the Upper Tribunal released a third interim decision in the case, relating to a very specific issue: had the UK derogated from Article 17 of Directive 2004/38 by the Accession (Immigration and Worker Registration) Regulations 2004?

И поэтому часто путаются из-за этого в отношении Великобритании. Вчера очередная форумчанка <noindex>консультирвалась со мной по Skype</noindex>, так же этот вопрос поднимался. Подтверждаю: Апостиль на визу жены и т.п. не нежен.

Сообщу точные сроки, как всегда, когда эта клиентка получил решение.

...(Для UK) ...и никогда не нужны было...

Пожалуйста. Рад был помочь.

Вот это я и имел в виду. Когда-нибудь они UK BA сделает одну систему подачи заявлений, как было раньше. Кстати, сейчас в ILPA будет обсуждаться реально животрепещащая тема, цитирую : "How to find out where to send settlement entry clearance supporting documents". Подавали в России - документы не сканировали - дали письмо - отсылайте в Шеффилд. На Украине - как Вы сказали (+клиентка настояла отослать - для подстраховки). Update по UK Spouse Visa Priority заявлению (RUS + 2 детей от другого брака) - на 35 день попросили доплатить за детей (хороший признак, как я полагаю). Ждем решения.

Рад был помочь. Всего Вам хорошего.

Приветствую, В принципе, можно (+ укажите GWF номер на конверте). Сама выписка мало роли инграет, нужны другие документы для доказательства фатическо проживания по адресу.

04 October 2017 - Useful Immigration News from the Immigration Lawyers who can help you - www.legalcentre.org - Ph: 0330 001 0342 or 07791145923 ⦁ UK Visas and Immigration Guidance: Priority change of circumstances for sponsors (3 October 2017) : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...sms-user-manual</noindex> Guidance about the priority service for Tier 2 and 5 employers sponsoring foreign workers. It gives information about the service and how to apply. ⦁ UK Visas and Immigration Guidance: Guidance on visa applications under Tier 5 (Youth Mobility Scheme) (1 October 2017) : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...mobility-scheme</noindex> Use these guidance notes to understand the details of the Tier 5 (Youth Mobility Scheme) and how to apply. ⦁ UK Visas and Immigration Guidance: Country returns guide (2 October 2017) : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...y-returns-guide</noindex> Home Office guidance on the documents required and processes for returning immigration offenders to their country of origin. ⦁ Same day premium service FLR(FP) applications from overstayers/irregular migrants It has ben reported that an FLR(FP) application by an overstayer/irregular migrant was successful when lodged via the PSC, despite the PSC taking some 30 days to decide on the application. NB The postal FLR(FP) application from an overstayer/irregular migrant is taking about 12 months on average.

Если стандарт тот же, то будут работать. См <noindex>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GSM</noindex>

По какой категории точно ? Уточните тип заявления и когда Вы подавали ? Сейчас фактически существуют 3 (!) системы подачи - зависит от страны и категории. Appendix FM (Settlement - визы "жен" британцев и т.п.) - обычно отправляются в Sheffield. EEA Family Permit - обычно сканируется. Иногда эти системы меняются местами...тогда становится совсем "весело" все... P.S. На первосисточнике указывается то же : <noindex>https://uk.tlscontact.com/ua/KBP/news.php?id=8301_4913</noindex> "All documents submitted by customers applying for PBS Tier 1, 2, 4 and 5, EEA applications and other non-settlement and non-visit visas will be scanned at the Visa Application Centre and sent electronically securely to UKVI. "

Возможно. Я отвечал в отношении замены паспорта "мамы". Какие сроки и цена на Украине, Игорь ?

02 October 2017 - Useful Immigration News from the Immigration Lawyers who can help you - www.legalcentre.org - Ph: 0330 001 0342 or 07791145923 ⦁ Hostile environment (for illegal immigrants in the UK): the UK banks are forced to check 70 million accounts : <noindex>https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/se...egal-immigrants</noindex> Banks and building societies are to carry out immigration checks on a reported 70 million bank accounts in accordance with the Immigration Act 2016, amending the Immigration Act 2014. The provision ordering this will come into force on 30 October 2017. Regulations introducing a code of practice have been laid down. For each account belonging to anyone illegally in the country, the bank must, under certain circumstances, notify the Home Office, who will then close it down or freeze it. This measure will make life harder for those in the country illegally. ⦁ Appendix FM applications from the US Virgin Islands The Appendix FM applications from the US Virgin Islands are treated to be lodged from the USA ⦁ Indefinite Leave to Enter endorsements (ILE) The ILE are usually "valid" for 2 years, bringing a lot of consufion. In fact, the ILE does not expire, but rather, the ILE vignette expires in line with the expiration date of the passport submitted at the time of application. See section 9.4: <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...ng-and-validity</noindex> "The ‘expiry’ date which is the date when the entry clearance will not be valid for travel to the UK, and nor will it confer leave to enter. The ‘expiry’ date for applicants who qualify for ILE should represent the expiry date of the applicant’s passport and does not indicate an expiry of ‘indefinite leave to enter’". ⦁ Home Office offers dubious assurances on fingerprints and ID cards for EU citizens : <noindex>http://mailchi.mp/the3million/et4z0u9759-739761</noindex> Campaign group the3million has issued a statement on the latest plans for settled status following a meeting with the Home Office. Some clarifications were made during a meeting between the Home Office and the3million regarding some false information circulating around the future criteria required for all of us after Brexit to obtain the documentation providing evidence of our rights. The Home Office has confirmed in accordance with the Policy Paper (of 26th June 2017) and subsequent negotiations with the Commission on Citizens’ Rights its position that EU citizens: - Will not have to prove CSI - Will not have to meet an income threshold - Will not have to submit finger prints - Will not be issued with an ID card The Home Office has repeated that they are focusing on designing a completely new system that will easily allow EU citizens currently living in the UK to obtain documentation. The June policy paper had said that settled status “will be evidenced through a residence document” and that officials “may also need to capture evidence of EU citizens’ biometric information”. Without a residence document, the paper continued, “current residents may find it difficult to access the labour market and services”. Yesterday’s announcement does not change that practical reality for EU citizens granted settled status. As ever, the appropriate response to unofficial Home Office assurances is scepticism. ⦁ Citizens’ rights: update after fourth round of Brexit negotiations : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/syste...h_Cion_V2.2.pdf</noindex> The fourth round of Brexit negotiations are over, with some signs of progress on the future status of EU citizens living in the UK. At the end of August, the EU-UK joint comparison of negotiating positions on citizens’ rights showed some 30 issues highlighted in red, indicating no agreement. This has been cut by about half in the latest document, showing the position at the end of September. ⦁ Tribunal established that the Home Office must prove present risk to deport EU citizens : <noindex>http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/IAC/2017/294.html</noindex> In the very recent case of Arranz (EEA Regulations – deportation – test) [2017] UKUT 294 (IAC) President McCloskey set out the correct approach to EU law deportations. The official Headnote instructs us: (i) The burden of proving that a person represents a genuine, present and sufficiently threat affecting one of the fundamental interests of society under Regulation 21(5)© of the EEA Regulations rests on the Secretary of State. (ii) The standard of proof is the balance of probabilities. (iii) Membership of an organisation proscribed under the laws of a foreign country does not without more satisfy the aforementioned test. (iv) The “Bouchereau” exception is no longer good law: CS (Morroco) applied. ⦁ This can happen : the Immigration Judge “wholly failing to meet standards”, the Upper Tier Tribunal finds : <noindex>http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2017/AA069062014.html</noindex> Three judges of the Upper Tribunal have examined 13 separate decisions of the same First-tier Tribunal judge and found them “wholly failing to meet the standards that are demanded by the office of a judge and expected by the parties”. The unreported judgment in AA069062014 & Ors. [2017] UKAITUR AA069062014 (30 August 2017) makes for profoundly uncomfortable reading. The panel, led by the Vice-President, said that “no more than the most basic principles of law are referred to in the decisions” of Judge Majid, “and even these seem to be quite often wrong”. There are many specific examples given. Three suffice to give a flavour of the whole. Each contains a quote from the First-tier decision under appeal, followed by a pithy comment from the Upper Tribunal (in parentheses). The Appellant should be aware that the current fiscal crisis cannot allow judges to permit people to remain in the UK when British citizens need jobs (not surprisingly, this sentiment is not found in any of the law the Judge was supposed to be applying). The burden of proof is upon the Appellant and the standard of proof is the balance of probabilities (in an asylum appeal). The best interests of the children are involved and that creates a knockout element (the opposite of what the authorities say).

Хит сезона был, когда еще не выдавали BRP а вместо этого просто клеили визы в паспорта, и можно было без клиента просто приехать с документами клиента и получить продление, ПМЖ и т.п. за минут 40-50. Подавал на получение ILR (ПМЖ) в личном визите. Подавали НОВЫЙ текущий паспорт и старый просроченный паспорт. Caseworker сказал, что все в порядке, визу вклеем через 30 минут, сходите попить кофе. Сходили попить кофе. Вернулись получать документы - в НОВОМ паспорте нет визы ! Нашли визу в просроченном паспорте.... Предъявили претензию. Caseworker извинился, забрал документы, сказал подождать минут 20. Через 20 минут приносят все документы -В НОВОМ ПАСПОРТЕ ВИЗЫ ОПЯТЬ НЕТ ! ВИЗА ОПЯТЬ ВКЛЕЕНА В ПРОСРОЧЕННЫЙ ПАСПОРТ !! Дубль 3 уже был похож на комедию....Используйте воображение... Дубля 4 не было - в этот раз клиент вклеили визу в НОВЫЙ паспорт.

50 на 50. Life in the UK действительно безсрочный. Хотите - можете сдать сейчас. В будущем разве что цена выростет и вопросы могут измениться.

...несколько тысяч фунтов...

+1............ Обычно звонят "спонсору" в UK.

Приветствую. Нужно будет заменить сначала внутренний паспорт, а потом - загранпаспорт. Если можете сделать все ДО подачи заявления на визу жены - сделайте, т.к. из UK будети намного сложнее...

Приветствую, Рад был помочь на данном этапе. После подачи Ваших документов Вам выдадут Confirmation и там будет сказано, что все оригиналы должны быть доставлены в Шеффилд в течение 10 дней. Обратите внимание, что Вам так же нужно вложить т.н. Pre-Paid Special Delivery Envelope чтобы UK BA смогли вернуть все документы на адрес в UK. Ни один из курьеров, как я понимаю, не предоставляет такой услуги, кроме британской Royal Mail - у последнего можно купить pre-paid special delivery envelope. Высылайте документы жене DHL - доходит за 2-3 дня.

Пожалуйста. Рад был помочь.

У моего клиента (+ 2 детей от прошлого брака) попросили доплатить за детей NHS Surcharge на примерно 28-м дне рассмотрения. Скоро решение будет. Уточню сроки тогда по конкретному примеру. NB Я писал в Sheffield и спонсор делал Escalation с его стороны. Т.е. здесь мы не ждем 56 и т.п. дней.

Обратился клиент (T2G) для получения ILR после 5 лет работы в UK. Как всегда, <noindex>оформляли ILR за 1 день в нашем местном PEO</noindex>. Заявление рассмотрели и одобрили за 1 час 45 минут в день подачи. Через 3 дня после подачи я получил Settlement BRP клиента. К сожалению, на Settlement BRP была опечатка в его имени, и я вернул BRP в UK BA. Через 8 дней пришла новая BRP карточка клиента. Имя было написано правильно, только вот с категории Settlement клиента перевели («понизили») в категорию Tier 4 (Student). Дубль два. Отослал все в UK BA. Новая BRP со ВСЕМИ правильными данными пришла через 5 дней.

29 September 2017 - Useful Immigration News from the Immigration Lawyers who can help you - www.legalcentre.org - Ph: 0330 001 0342 or 07791145923 ⦁ It seems that the UK VAC is not coping with the Appendix FM (Settlement - Spouse, Partner, Fiance(e) etc applications Applied to have your spouse's Entry Clearance case (spouse of a UK citzien etc) via the so-called UK BA Premium Service (14 days) consideration route ? According to multiple reports, it is not working and the applicants receive the following E-mails from various UK VACs aross the globe: "Regarding Visa Application: GWFxxxxxxxxxx For: XXXXX X XXXXXXX Thank you for applying for a UK visa. Your visa application has been received and is under consideration. We aim to process non settlement applications within 15 working days (unless you have opted for the Priority Visa service), and settlement applications within 60 working days. Unfortunately, the processing of your application has not been straightforward and we will be unable to decide your application within our customer service targets. We are continuing to work on your application and aim to make a decision as soon as possible. We will write to you again if there is any change to this. Please do not attend the Visa Application Centre until you have been advised that your application has been decided and that your passport is ready for collection. Kind Regards, UK Decision Making Centre" ⦁ Incorrect Visa and BRP endorsements : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/..._eid=1af5cd4d48</noindex> The options to correct the Incorrect Visa and BRP endorsements.

Мы подавали после изменения Правил на основани дела MM.