British Lawyer

Я обычно так же utility bills прикладываю. Договор на сьем жилья - рекомендую, на всякий случай.

Приветствую, Подал в этом году несколько десятков заявлений FLR(M)/FLR(FP) форумчан и не только в личном визите в <noindex>нашем местном PSC</noindex>. Сумма всегда одна и та же : £500 за визу на 2.5 года (т.е. по £200 за полный год и £100 за неполный год).

Приветствую, Отличные новости. Насчет X-Ray. Это не рентген :-) Вы просто через магнитную рамку прошли :-)

18 June 2018 – Read the reviews about our assistance to immigrants and their families like And as usual, the useful and just interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre - www.legalcentre.org – Mob : +44(0)7791145923 >>> Retained Rights of Residence for non-EEA citizens – No need to show the ex-EEA spouse’s economic activity during the divorce period: <noindex>http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2018/1088.html</noindex> An important decision by the UK Court of Appeal (Baigazieva v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 1088) confirming that a third country national, in order to retain a right to reside in the UK in reliance on Regulation 10(5), does not need to show that their former EEA spouse exercised treaty rights as a “qualified person” until the divorce, the decree absolute, itself. Rather, it is sufficient to show that the former EEA spouse exercised treaty rights until divorce proceedings were commenced. >>> Home Secretary announces new “start-up” Immigration Route: <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-star...ntent=immediate</noindex> According to one part of the announcement, it will replace the Tier 1 (Graduate Entrepreneur) route from spring 2019, although another part of the press release refers to it as an expansion, rather than a replacement. The first big difference between the new proposal and what currently exists is that applicants will not have to be recent graduates (left university within the last two years, as currently required under the Sirius programme) in order to apply for endorsement. The second big difference is that the group of entities which can endorse an applicant with a business idea is expanded from approved Higher Education Institutions and the government’s own entrepreneur programme, to “approved business sponsor(s), including accelerators”. This would mark a further move by the Home Office towards the greater use of third-party endorsements in the immigration system, currently the model used for applications in the Tier 1 (Exceptional Talent) route. The announcement also refers to making “the visa process faster and smoother for entrepreneurs coming to the UK” although no details are given on this. However, the original MAC report suggested that the accelerators – those “approved business sponsors” mentioned in the press release – should have to put a certain amount of cash into the start-up: “Accelerators should be required to provide a minimum investment, perhaps somewhere in the region of £20,000 to £30,000, usually in exchange for equity in the business to ensure that they are suitably incentivised to select only high potential entrepreneurs.”. With the above requirement it is hard to believe that the new programme will be really popular. >>> NHS exemption from Tier 2 visa quota confirmed in changes to Immigration Rules: <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...54-15-june-2018</noindex> The Home Secretary has today laid a Statement of Changes to the Immigration Rules to exempt doctors and nurses from the limit on visas for skilled non-EU workers. Sajid Javid and Jeremy Hunt, the Health Secretary, announced in a press release that “there will be no restriction on the numbers of doctors and nurses who can be employed through the Tier 2 visa route”. The NHS accounts for around 40% of all Tier 2 places, according to the Home Office.

Пожалуйста. Рал был помочь.

Уточните детали вопроса - заявление какое подаете ?

14 June 2018 – Read the reviews about our assistance to immigrants and their families like And as usual, the useful and just interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre - www.legalcentre.org – Mob : +44(0)7791145923 >>> Can the Entry Clearance Office (ECO) revoke the issued Indefinite Leave to Enter vignette, issued in error or discretionally ? Apparently, they may not, as if activated, then it may be binding: <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...entry-clearance</noindex> “ECOs cannot revoke entry clearance that has taken effect as leave to enter (i.e. once the person has arrived in UK), or revoke, cancel or curtail that leave.”.

Если подавали сами, вряд ли что-то можете сделать. Т.к., мне приходят e-mail от caseworkers и я, если нужно, могу общаться с caseworker напрямую. Как например здесь, когда не пришла карточка BRP - Permanent Residence и я попросил case-worker разобраться: Как Вы можете видеть, case-worker попросила меня подтвердить получение BRP карточки, что было и сделано через 3 дня, когда BRP клиента была успешно получена.

У меня такого обычно не бывает, за очень редким исключением. Что могу сказать...Ждите...

Обычно никогда не заполняю эту секция для подач заявлений форумчан и не только в личном визите. Так же не заполняю эту секцию при подаче заявлений клиентов по почте, т.к. пишу сопроводительное письмо.

12 June 2018 – Read the reviews about our assistance to immigrants and their families like And as usual, the useful and just interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre - www.legalcentre.org – Mob : +44(0)7791145923 >>> Can an EEA national child apply for Registration as a British citizen without first obtaining Permanent Residence in the UK ? The answer if “No”, in line with the <noindex>http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2015/1806/note/made</noindex> “Regulation 7 amends paragraphs 7, 13 and 14 of Schedule 2 to the 2003 Regulations, which set out particular requirements as respects applications under sections 4(2) and 6(1) and (2) of the 1981 Act, respectively. Pursuant to the amended paragraphs, applicants relying upon an EU right of permanent residence in the United Kingdom in order to meet the relevant statutory requirement in the 1981 Act must provide with their application a valid permanent residence card or document certifying permanent residence or a residence permit or residence document issued under the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2000 which is endorsed under the immigration rules to show permission to remain in the United Kingdom.” >>> How to calculate the amount of adequate maintenance if the sponsor receives one of the specified allowances in order to sponsor a foreign spouse ? The answer can be found in the case of Ahmed (benefits: proof of receipt; evidence) [2013] UKUT 84(IAC): <noindex>http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/IAC/20...bangladesh.html</noindex>

Приветствую, Я в анкетах форумачан обычно указывают страну и родственников первого колена - родители, бадушки-дедушки, браться-сестры.

Паспорт будет пустой - это не поможет. Обычно UK BA после сдачи Вами биометрики высылает отдельное письмо, где подтвержается Ваше право на работу. Называется Certificate of Application (CoA).

Добрый день, Обычно Вы так же должны получить отдельное письмо из UK BA где сказано, что Вы можете паботать. Называется Certificate of Application. Обычно на одной странице. Мы такие десятками получает по заявлениям форумчан. Сейчас нет ресурса отсканировать.

11 June 2018 – Read the reviews about our assistance to immigrants and their families like yours here: <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/reviews.php</noindex> And as usual, the useful and just interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre - www.legalcentre.org – Mob : +44(0)7791145923 >>> When law and politics collide: Brexit in the Court of Session: <noindex>https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/docs/default-...61.pdf?sfvrsn=0</noindex> The Court of Session has refused to make a reference to the Court of Justice of the European Union in Luxembourg to determine whether the UK’s notice that it is leaving the EU under Article 50 can be cancelled. Given that the subject matter involved “the most contentious and political debate of our time” [paragraph 62], the Court of Session (Scotland’s equivalent to the High Court) decided that it fell outside its jurisdiction. It is a long-standing tenet of the UK constitution that the courts do not adjudicate on political matters. The democratic process is liable to be subverted if, on questions of moral and political judgements, opponents of a particular position can achieve through the courts what they can not achieve in Parliament (to paraphrase Lord Bingham in Countryside Alliance v Attorney General [2007] UKHL 52 at [45]).

Пожалуйста. Рад был помочь.

07 June 2018 – Read the reviews about our assistance to immigrants and their families like yours here: <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/reviews.php</noindex> And as usual, the useful and just interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre - www.legalcentre.org – Mob : +44(0)7791145923 >>> What if the FLRM extension application refused on the basis of failing to meet the A2 English language level test requirement ? The answer is “appeal”, as such a refusal is likely to be disproportionate and unlawful. Para 32B of the Rules states: … the decision-maker may discount the test certificate or result and require the applicant to provide a new test certificate or result from an approved provider which shows that they meet the requirement, if they are not exempt from it. The, the Appendix FM section 1.21states: If there is uncertainty as to whether a test certificate, result or other specified document was previously accepted by the Home Office as part of a successful previous partner or parent application, the decision maker may request other specified evidence from the applicant to demonstrate that they meet the English language requirement. If the only reason for the refusal was a suspect English test, then a fair and sensible ECO/caseworker would have given the applicant an opportunity to provide other specified evidence. Moreover, the case-law notes in HU071822015 & Ors. [2017] UKAITUR HU071822015 (14 August 2017) state: “This appeal came before me for an error of law hearing on 19 July 2017. I found an error of law in the decision of the First tier Tribunal, which I append. The parties agreed I could re-make the decision without the need for an oral hearing, but with the assistance of written submissions, which I have now received. 2. The only issue outstanding, it now being accepted that the Appellants meet the financial requirements of the Rules, is whether the Entry Clearance Officer erred in failing to contact the first Appellant to request an English language certificate from an approved provider, in line with the principle of evidential flexibility. This is now set out in Appendix FM SE, the relevant provisions of which are as follows: … … Answer 36. I conclude that the answer to the question identified in para 1 above is “yes”: the agency’s refusal of Mr Mandalia’s application was unlawful because, properly interpreted, the process instruction obliged it first to have invited him to repair the deficit in his evidence.” … So the course of the action could be to appeal, take the test (prior to appeal decision) and cite above. >>> Applying for a UK visa from the USA – settlement and non-settlement applications process See all the details here: <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...visa-in-the-usa</noindex>

Приветствую, Отличные новости. Рад был помочь.

Приветствую, До ТРЕХ недель бывает, хотя обычно быстрее. Вы Special Delivery прикладывали ?

На гражданство я уже пару десятков лет <noindex>заверяю документы клиентов</noindex> и не подаю оригиналы документов в UK BA. Так же и по <noindex>заявлениям в личном визите</noindex> - прихожу с клиентами в UK BA, подаю заявление клиентов, отпускаю клиентов попить кофе, забираем решение и клиенты получают BRP через обычно 2-3 дня.

06 June 2018 – Read the reviews about our assistance to immigrants and their families like yours here: <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/reviews.php</noindex> And as usual, the useful and just interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre - www.legalcentre.org – Mob : +44(0)7791145923 >>> UK Government’s current intentions in relation to the EU nationals after Brexit – an UPDATE: <noindex>https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201...1075/107502.htm</noindex> • EU nationals arriving in the UK between 29 March 2019 and 31 December 2020, and intending to stay longer than three months, will need to register (no particular details on this registration scheme are available at present) • EU nationals and their family members will have until 30 June 2021 to apply under the new “EU Exit Settlement Scheme” • The new EU Exit Settlement Scheme will be launched by the end of 2018 • EU nationals residing in the UK before 31 December 2020 will be able to have their family members join them, provided those family relations existed before that date. Future partners will need to meet the requirements of the domestic Immigration Rules (aka Appendix FM, £18 600+ threshold, TB, English language tests etc) • The Dublin III arrangements will continue to apply during the transitional period >>> Same-sex spouses should benefit from free movement rights, says CJEU: eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:158:0077:0123:en:PDF Following a reference made to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) by the Romanian Constitutional Court, the CJEU has ruled that “spouses” in Directive 2004/38 include same-sex spouses. The case is C-673/16 Relu Adrian Coman and Others v Inspectoratul General pentru Imigrări and Others and the CJEU’s press release summarises the finding as follows: “Although the Member States have the freedom whether or not to authorise marriage between persons of the same sex, they may not obstruct the freedom of residence of an EU citizen by refusing to grant his same-sex spouse, a national of a country that is not an EU Member State, a derived right of residence in their territory”.

05 June 2018 – Read the reviews about our assistance to immigrants and their families like yours here: <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/reviews.php</noindex> And as usual, the useful and just interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre - www.legalcentre.org – Mob : +44(0)7791145923 >>> No costs awarded despite “clearly unfounded” certification being withdrawn: <noindex>http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2018/1059.html</noindex> In ZN (Afghanistan) and KA (Iraq) [2018] EWCA Civ 1059, the Court of Appeal considered the tricky issue of costs in public law cases, in a scenario where the appeals were withdrawn following consent orders.

Вы про Ваш иммиграционный статус спрашиваете или в общем, по семейному вопросу ?

На этой неделе взял слоты клиентам-форумчанам на 11.00 в нашем местном PEO на 11.00 - <noindex>SET(O), SET(M), FLR(M), FLR(FP)</noindex>, во вторник и четверг - Пишу для статистики.

У Вас детальные вопросы. Жду Вас на консультацию, во время которой я отвечу на все интересующие Вас вопросы: <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html</noindex>