British Lawyer

Првиетствую, "Перебор". Доказательство проживания не нужны. Секци. 1.50 заполнили ПРАВИЛЬНО ?

Если есть ОБЩИЙ ребенок-британец - можно без выезда переоформить визу. Или же если спонсор-британец инвалид и т.п. - так же потенциально можно.

Приветствую, Да, можете так написать (NB Уровень 2 - достаточен для продения визы "жены").

17 July 2018 – Read the reviews about our assistance to immigrants and their families like yours :-) And as usual, the useful and just interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre - www.legalcentre.org – Mob : +44(0)7791145923 >>> UKVI Guidance: Returning residents (13 July 2018): <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...ntent=immediate</noindex> Guidance on processing returning resident applications

Приветствую. Выбор не большой. EEA Regulations - виза партнера гражданина/гражланки EU. Выдается на 5 лет с правом работы и т.п. Как всегда, есть ряд условий.

14 July 2018 – Read the reviews about our assistance to immigrants and their families like yours :-) And as usual, the useful and just interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre - www.legalcentre.org – Mob : +44(0)7791145923 >>> Court of Justice finds Surinder Singh applies to extended family members: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/EUECJ/2018/C8917.html The unmarried partner of a British citizen who returns to the UK having resided in another EU country does have rights under EU law, the Court of Justice of the European Union has today held in the case of C 89/17 Banger v UK. The court also finds that if such a person is refused, he or she is entitled to a proper investigation of the factual basis of the case. In other words, the Court of Justice extends the principle of the Surinder Singh judgment to extended family members. The judgment makes clear that there is no automatic right to a residence card for extended family members. They are entitled to facilitation of their entry and residence and to extensive examination of their personal circumstances and any refusal must be justified by reasons, all in accordance with the rights of extended family members in Article 3 of Directive 2004/38. This decision means that UK has been wrongly refusing applications of this type for years and will have to formally amend the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (SI 2016 No. 1052) in order to comply with EU law. The judgment also implies that the UK’s decision to abolish full rights of appeal for extended family members in 2016 was incompatible with EU law. Instead of merits appeals, extended family members now have to rely on an application for judicial review as their only available remedy. The court held that when an extended family member is refused a residence document, that person: - must have available to them a redress procedure in order to challenge a decision to refuse a residence authorisation taken against them, following which the national court must be able to ascertain whether the refusal decision is based on a sufficiently solid factual basis and whether the procedural safeguards were complied with. It is hard to see that an application for judicial review really provides this type of remedy. The grounds of challenge are based on reviewing whether the decision under challenge was lawful, not whether it was “correct” in the opinion of the judge. Judicial review does not permit the judge hearing the case to make up his or her own mind about what the outcome should be, only whether the decision-maker made any legal errors in reaching the decision. There is a line of authority suggesting that judicial review is an adequate remedy in EU law, though, so the question of whether a formal right of appeal needs to be restored is not entirely straightforward. What is straightforward is that the original tribunal decision in Sala which triggered the abolition of rights of appeal for extended family members has been held to be wrong in the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court and now implied to be wrong by the Court of Justice. There was no need to abolish rights of appeal and on a policy and human level, the Home Office should just restore them. It is very hard indeed to see the justification for removing a relatively cheap and effective remedy and replacing it with a complex, expensive and flawed one. It is standard when the Home Office wins a case for the regulations to be amended immediately, but when the Home Office loses a case for it to take many months for implementation to occur. The last case the UK lost, Lounes, which was on the issue of the rights of dual EU-UK nationals, was in December 2017 but will only be implemented in late July 2018. Extended family members wishing to benefit from Surinder Singh will probably need to wait many months before the regulations are formally amended. But applications should not be refused in the meantime and if there is a pressing need an application could be made now. Looking ahead, Surinder Singh families are not covered by the draft Brexit Withdrawal Agreement, but the UK government has said that they will be able to apply for the settled status scheme anyway.

13 July 2018 – Read the reviews about our assistance to immigrants and their families like yours :-) And as usual, the useful and just interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre - www.legalcentre.org – Mob : +44(0)7791145923 >>> What the Brexit White Paper says about immigration: <noindex>https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/go...WEB_VERSION.pdf</noindex> The UK Government has published a White Paper describing what it wants from the future relationship between the UK and EU. The 100-page document includes some references to the future of immigration from the EU, but only in certain, limited areas. Overall, the government does not have a policy on what will replace free movement of people. That is to be the job of a separate White Paper and an Immigration Bill, which “will bring EU migration under UK law, enabling the UK to set out its future immigration system in domestic legislation… further details of the UK’s future immigration system will be set out in due course”. In the meantime, set out in full below are the various aspects of the White Paper that do touch on immigration and asylum. Perhaps more significant than any of those passages is the promise that “the UK is committed to membership of the European Convention on Human Rights” and “will remain a party to the ECHR after it has left the EU”. And so: 1.4 Framework for mobility 72. EU citizens are integral to communities across the UK, with 3.5 million EU citizens living in the UK. Approximately 800,000 UK nationals play an equally important role in communities across the EU. The UK and the EU have already reached an agreement on citizens’ rights which provides EU citizens living in the UK and UK nationals living in the EU before the end of the implementation period with certainty about their rights going forward. Individuals will continue to be able to move, live and work on the same basis as now up until the end of December 2020. 1.4.1 Ending free movement of people 73. In future it will be for the UK Government and Parliament to determine the domestic immigration rules that will apply. Free movement of people will end as the UK leaves the EU. The Immigration Bill will bring EU migration under UK law, enabling the UK to set out its future immigration system in domestic legislation. 74. The UK will design a system that works for all parts of the UK. The Migration Advisory Committee (MAC) report, due in September 2018, will provide important evidence on patterns of EU migration and the role of migration in the wider economy to inform this. Further details of the UK’s future immigration system will be set out in due course. 75. The UK will continue to be an open and tolerant nation, and will want to continue to attract the brightest and best, from the EU and elsewhere. The UK’s future immigration arrangements will set out how those from the EU and elsewhere can apply to come and work in the UK. This will be crucial to supporting its public services, as well as enhancing the UK’s attractiveness for research, development and innovation. 1.4.2 Future mobility arrangements 76. Any future mobility arrangements will be consistent with the ending of free movement, respecting the UK’s control of its borders and the Government’s objective to control and reduce net migration. Trade agreements which cover trade in services include provisions on the mobility of people for the provision of services (known as ‘Mode 4’ commitments). Given the depth of the relationship and close ties between the peoples of the UK and the EU, the UK will make a sovereign choice in a defined number of areas to seek reciprocal mobility arrangements with the EU, building on current WTO GATS commitments. The UK has already proposed that this should be achieved in an appropriate framework for mobility, in line with arrangements that the UK might want to offer to other close trading partners in the future, where they support new and deep trade deals. The UK’s future economic partnership should therefore provide reciprocal arrangements, consistent with the ending of free movement, that: a. support businesses to provide services and to move their talented people; b. allow citizens to travel freely, without a visa, for tourism and temporary business ac-tivity; c. facilitate mobility for students and young people, enabling them to continue to benefit from world leading universities and the cultural experiences the UK and the EU have to offer; d. are as streamlined as possible to ensure smooth passage for legitimate travel while strengthening the security of the UK’s borders; and e. provide for other defined mobility provisions, including arrangements to ensure that UK citizens living in the EU, in future, continue to benefit from their pension entitle-ments and associated healthcare. 77. These proposals are without prejudice to the Common Travel Area (CTA) arrangements between the UK and Ireland, and the Crown Dependencies. The CTA means that Irish citizens will continue to enjoy a special status in the UK, provided for by domestic legislation, distinct from the status of other EU nationals. 78. The principle of non-discrimination between existing Member States should apply to all of the provisions agreed as part of the framework for mobility. Business and services 79. UK firms and global investors rely on the ability to move and attract talent to support global operations, and to send people to provide services across Europe. Indeed, mobility is a key element of economic, cultural and scientific cooperation, ensuring professional service providers can reach clients, advanced manufacturers can deploy key personnel to the right place, and scientists can collaborate on world-leading projects. 80. The UK would seek reciprocal arrangements that would allow UK nationals to visit the EU without a visa for short-term business reasons and equivalent arrangements for EU citizens coming to the UK. This would permit only paid work in limited and clearly defined circumstances, in line with the current business visa policy. 81. As is the case with non-EU countries with whom the UK has a trading agreement, the UK also wants to agree reciprocal provisions on intra-corporate transfers that allow UK and EU-based companies to train staff, move them between offices and plants and to deploy expertise where it is needed, based on existing arrangements with non-EU countries. The UK will also discuss how to facilitate temporary mobility of scientists and researchers, self-employed professionals, employees providing services, as well as investors. Tourism 82. In the year ending September 2017, UK residents made approximately 50 million non-business related visits to the EU spending £24 billion, and EU residents made over 20 million non-business related visits to the UK spending £7.8 billion. 83. The UK therefore proposes reciprocal visa-free travel arrangements to enable UK and EU citizens to continue to travel freely for tourism in the future, maintaining the close links between the people of the UK and the EU. 84. The Government wants UK and EU nationals to continue to be able to use the European Health Insurance Card (EHIC) to receive healthcare should they need it while on holiday. Students and young people 85. The UK and the EU should continue to give young people and students the chance to benefit from each other’s world leading universities, including cultural exchanges such as Erasmus+. 86. The UK proposes a UK-EU youth mobility scheme to ensure that young people can continue to enjoy the social, cultural and educational benefits of living in each other’s countries. The UK already operates a number of youth mobility schemes with other global partners, for example with Australia and Canada, on which this could be modelled. Streamlined border arrangements and administrative procedures 87. The UK already has existing arrangements with low-risk, non-EU countries that enable smooth access at the border, such as the Registered Traveller Scheme in place with a number of countries like the US and Japan. The UK wants to agree reciprocal arrangements with the EU that ensure smooth passage for UK nationals when they travel to the EU, for example on business or on holiday. The UK will strengthen the security of its borders, which should include exploring whether to apply the electronic travel authorities proposed for third country nationals to each other’s nationals, and ensuring travel documents meet minimum security standards. But at the border, as now, tourists and business visitors should not routinely have to face questions about the purpose of their visit. The UK also wants to minimise administrative burdens for those seeking permission to travel, enter or reside in each other’s territories, including short, simple and user-friendly application processes. 88. Streamlined arrangements are particularly important at the Gibraltar-Spain border, which is crossed every day by thousands of people from other Member States. Other mobility provisions 89. While ending free movement, the UK will also make a sovereign choice to discuss other specific mobility areas. The UK will seek reciprocal arrangements on the future rules around some defined elements of social security coordination. This will be important for UK nationals who want to live, work or retire in the EU in the future, as part of our new arrangements. This could cover provisions for the uprating of state pensions, including export rules and accompanying aggregation principles for people who have contributed into multiple countries’ systems. It would also ensure workers only pay social security contributions in one state at a time. There should be reciprocal healthcare cover for state pensioners retiring to the EU or the UK, continued participation in the EHIC scheme and cooperation on planned medical treatment. This would be supported by any necessary administrative cooperation and data-sharing requirements. 90. The UK will also seek to secure onward movement opportunities for UK nationals in the EU who are covered by the citizens’ rights agreement. Some of these UK nationals have chosen to make their lives in the EU, and this should be respected in the opportunities available to them if they decide to change their Member State of residence. 91. The framework for mobility could also cover the recognition of professional qualifications held by UK and EU nationals as covered in section 1.3 of this chapter. … 2.5.1 Asylum and illegal migration 98. Properly managed migration brings benefits to local communities and economies. But high levels of illegal migration present a global challenge, enabling organised crime, people trafficking and modern slavery to prosper. 99. The UK has a significant presence overseas, conducting capacity and capability building in source and transit countries and deconstructing criminal business models, through participation in development programmes and through seconded national experts. It is vital that the UK and the EU establish a new, strategic relationship to address the global challenges of asylum and illegal migration. 100. The UK therefore proposes a comprehensive, ‘whole of route’ approach that includes interventions at every stage of the migrant journey and ensure no new incentives are created to make dangerous journeys to Europe. It should cover: a. ongoing operational cooperation, for example working with Frontex to strengthen the EU’s external border, and Europol to combat organised immigration crime; b. a new legal framework to return illegal migrants and asylum-seekers to a country they have travelled through, or have a connection with, in order to have their protection claim considered, where necessary. People should be prevented from making claims in more than one country, and on multiple occasions. A clear legal structure, facilitated by access to Eurodac (the biometric and fingerprint database used for evidencing secondary asylum claims) or an equivalent system will help achieve this; c. new arrangements that enable unaccompanied asylum-seeking children in the EU to join close family members in the UK, where it is in their best interests and vice versa; d. a continued strategic partnership to address the drivers of illegal migration by invest-ing and building cooperation in source and transit countries; e. continued UK participation in international dialogues with European and African partners, frameworks, and processes, such as the Rabat and Khartoum Processes, to tackle illegal migration upstream; and f. the option to align and work together on potential future funding instruments through the cooperative accord on overseas development assistance and international action outlined in chapter 3.4.

Пожалуйста. Рад был помочь.

Обычно так проще для всех.

На гостевую обычно не придираютя к самостоятельным переводам. Я обычно рекомендую все-таки заверенный перевод. Если у Вас уже есть готовый перевод, я могу заверить его.

Если у Вас есть готовый перевод, я могу заверить его. Языки: RUS-UKR-ENG

12 July 2018 – Read the reviews about our assistance to immigrants and their families like yours :-) And as usual, the useful and just interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre - www.legalcentre.org – Mob : +44(0)7791145923 >>> Changes to the EEA Regulations come into force on 24 July 2018 The latest, and presumably last, amendments to the EEA Regulations were laid before Parliament on 3 July 2018. The Immigration (European Economic Area) (Amendment) Regulations 2018 (SI 2018 No. 801) will come into force on 24 July 2018. Implementing a number of cases decided by the Court of Justice of the European Union, the amendments make the following changes to the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (SI 2016 No. 1052). Dual nationals Since 2012, the Secretary of State has interpreted the case of C-434/09 McCarthy to mean that British citizens who also hold the nationality of another EU country cannot rely on the EEA Regulations when sponsoring their family members. Unless they could use the so-called Surinder Singh route, dual British/EU citizens had to rely on (more restrictive) British domestic rules to sponsor their family members. In the case of C-165/16 Lounes, the Court of Justice found instead that EU citizens who move to the UK and later naturalise as British retain their free movement rights under EU law, even though they have become British. The Regulations are amended to reflect the judgment in Lounes. Dual nationals can rely on EU law so long as they exercised treaty rights before naturalising as British citizens. It seems that this change will survive Brexit. In fact, the Statement of Intent of 21 June 2018 (paragraph 6.5) confirms that family members of this category of dual nationals will be allowed to apply for status to live in the UK under the coming EU Settlement Scheme. Retaining self-employed status This change comes following the Court of Justice decision in C-442/16 Gusa. The conditions where an EEA citizen can retain self-employed status are brought into line with the conditions under which an EEA citizen can retain worker status. The advantage of being able to keep self-employed status is that the person is considered to be “exercising treaty rights”. That means they continue to live lawfully in the UK, have access to certain benefits, are able to have family members join them in the UK, and can count time towards the five years’ residence needed to acquire permanent residence. Self-employed EEA citizens can now retain that status where: • They are temporarily unable to work as self-employed as the result of an illness or accident • They are in “duly recorded involuntary unemployment” after having been self-employed persons, provided that they: o registered as jobseekers o entered the UK as self-employed or to seek self-employed work, or were in the UK seeking employment or self-employment immediately after having enjoyed a right to reside as self-employed, self-sufficient or student o provide evidence of seeking employment or self-employment and having a genuine chance of being engaged • They are involuntarily no longer self-employed and are doing vocational training, or • They voluntarily stopped being self-employed in order to do vocational training related to their previous occupation Those seeking employment who have already worked for a year as self-employed can retain status for longer than six months where they provide compelling evidence of continuing to seek employment and having a genuine chance of being engaged. Those who worked for less than one year can only retain their status for a maximum of six months. Of course, if the reassurances given by the British government materialise, EU nationals will not be asked to prove that they have exercised treaty rights in the UK to be able to remain living here after Brexit. So if all goes well, this change will have a very small impact, and for a very short amount of time only. Surinder Singh These changes are somewhat late, in that they give effect to the 2014 case of C-456/12 O and B. This was about the “Surinder Singh route”. That allows non-EU family members of British citizens to rely on the more generous EU rules on coming to join their loved one in the UK where: • the British citizen was exercising treaty rights in another EEA country or acquired the right to permanent residence there • the applicant and the British citizen resided together in that other EEA country • their residence in the EEA country was genuine The Regulations are amended such that, in addition to the above, an applicant relying on this route must show that • they were the family member of the British citizen in the other EEA country, and • genuine family life was created or strengthened during their joint residence there This change is unlikely to make a huge difference to many applicants. If the first three requirements are met, it is likely the two new requirements would also have been met. Exclusion and deportation orders Changes are made to the Regulations such that a person who is subject to an exclusion or a deportation order under the EEA Regulations does not have: • a right of admission • an initial right of residence • an extended right of residence, or • a permanent right of residence Someone who is subject to such an order and applies for a family permit or residence document will have their application deemed invalid. These changes should only apply to people who have an exclusion or deportation order under EU law, rather than under British domestic rules. In fact, in the case of C-82/16 K.A. & Others v Belgium, the Court of Justice found that applicants who are subject to an entry ban under national law cannot be precluded from applying for a right to reside under EU law. Primary carers of EEA nationals The EEA Regulations provide for some primary carers of EEA nationals to obtain rights to reside in the UK. Under the EEA Regulations 2016, one of the criteria to be considered a primary carer was to be the sole carer or to share the care equally with someone who was not an “exempt person”. An exempt person is someone with the right to reside under the EEA Regulations, the right of abode or indefinite leave to remain in the UK. This clear and accessible guide covers the legal requirements for EU residence documents and the practicalities of making an application including advice on documents and forms. In other words, if Sergei, a Russian national, was sharing the responsibility to care for Anna, a British national, with Anna’s mother, a Latvia national exercising treaty rights, then Sergei could not be considered a primary carer under European law. Following the case of C-133/15 Chavez-Vilchez and others, the definition of primary carer is widened. It now includes those who share responsibility equally with someone else, even if that someone is an “exempt person”. Deportation and permanent residence The case of C 424/16 Vomero. The Court of Justice found that where an EEA national has resided in the UK for ten years, they must have acquired the right to permanent residence before being entitled to the enhanced protection against expulsion. The Regulations are amended to make that clear. Other amendments Other minor amendments to the Regulations include that: • When a family member applies for an EEA family permit or residence document, they must also submit the EEA national’s identity card and passport. It is unclear how this constitutes a change as this has in fact been the case for a while in guidance and applications were rejected when the identity document of the EEA national was not submitted. • EEA family permits can be issued in an electronic format. • There is a clarification as to when a person must be outside the UK to bring an EEA appeal. Of course, for how long those changes will remain relevant is yet to be seen. We can only hope that the positive changes, including for primary carers and dual nationals, will re-appear in the domestic rules on EEA nationals and their family members after Brexit. >>> Sajid Javid sasys that the free movement could be replaced with “labour mobility” for executives: <noindex>https://www.parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/1...bb-670c704f2e68</noindex> The right of free movement for EU migrants could be replaced with something more like the arrangements making travel easier for Canadian business people, the Home Secretary has said. Sajid Javid told the Home Affairs committee of MPs today that free movement will end after Brexit, “full stop”, and repeatedly mentioned the immigration components of an Canadian-EU trade deal — limited to “labour mobility” for professionals — as an example of what could replace it.

11 July 2018 – Read the reviews about our assistance to immigrants and their families like yours :-) And as usual, the useful and just interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre - www.legalcentre.org – Mob : +44(0)7791145923 >>> Tier 2 visas: what to do if the migrant was terminated and then re-instated ? The UK BA response in this case is: “Once the sponsor has made the decision to terminate a migrants employment they should report this via the SMS within 10 days. If however the migrant is re-instated for any reason the sponsor could log back into the SMS and withdraw the report if the leave to remain had not been curtailed at that stage. If the leave had been curtailed we would then ask the curtailment team to re-instate the leave due to an Employment tribunal outcome and await their decision.”

Я сейчас работаю с несколькими форумачанами из России и Украины по делам перевоза их родителей. Могу помочь. Я здесь : <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html</noindex>

Обратите внимание, что на визу мужа/жены/невесты/жениха/нерасписанного партнера для ПЕРВИЧНОГО въезда в Великобританию принимается ТОЛЬКО IELTS General for UK VI. Академический IELTS не принимается, даже более высшего уровня.

Если BRP не был выдан НИКОГДА, то секция про BRP не заполняется, т.е. ставится ответ "No".

Обычно достаточно документа 2-3 в год на пару. Да, можете взять слот из-за рубежа, если система пропустит. После получения ILR нигде в UK BA не нужно обновлять данные свои.

Приветствую, С буквами - как Вам самой/самому нравится. Я ЗАГЛАВНЫЕ буквы использую.

Приветствую, Отпечатки (обычно 1 палец просят приложить) в аэропорту не считаются. В анкете обычно указывается только последнее место, где заявитель сдавал отпечатки.

Пока "Европа" выигрывает, суммарно. Пока... P.S. Когда мои клиенты подают на натурализацию, я заверяю копии их паспортов и паспорта (и BRP, если есть), остаются у клиентов на руках, и мои клиенты могу свободно и н сколько нужно выезжать за рубеж.

Приветствую, Секция 8.2 Appendix FM - Financial - Вам в помощь: <noindex>https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&a...vWKTD7qg-HjTNHs</noindex> Цитата : "8.2. Pension – Specified Evidence 8.2.1 The evidence required to demonstrate Pension income is specified in Appendix FM-SE: 10(e) To evidence a pension, all the following evidence must be provided: (i) Official documentation from: (1) The Department for Work and Pensions (in respect of the Basic State Pension and the Additional or Second State Pension) or other government department or agency, including the Veterans Agency; (2) An overseas pension authority; or (3) A pension company, confirming pension entitlement and amount. (ii) At least one personal bank statement in the 12-month period prior to the date of application showing payment of the pension into the person's account. (iii) For the purposes of sub-paragraph (i), War Disablement Pension, War Widow’s/Widower’s Pension and any other pension or equivalent payment for life made under the War Pensions Scheme, the Armed Forces Compensation Scheme or the Armed Forces Attributable Benefits Scheme may be treated as a pension, unless excluded under paragraph 21 of this Appendix."

09 July 2018 – Read the reviews about our assistance to immigrants and their families like yours 😊 And as usual, the useful and just interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre - www.legalcentre.org – Mob : +44(0)7791145923 >>> Refusing citizenship for historic evasion of immigration control confirmed as lawful: <noindex>http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2018/1615.html</noindex> This is an unsuccessful challenge to a good character naturalization refusal. The claimant sought to argue that the policy of refusing citizenship on the ground of bad character where the person had broken immigration laws in the preceding decade was ultra vires the British Nationality Act 1981. The case is R (Al Enein) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWHC 1615 (Admin). >>> Can a British Overseas Citizen be stateless? – See <noindex>http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2018/1586.html</noindex> In Teh v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWHC 1586 (Admin) the High Court has found that a British Overseas Citizen (BOC) can be stateless under the Immigration Rules if he or she has no other nationality. This is an interesting and pragmatic finding which highlights the largely useless nature of BOC status. >>> The Republic of Ireland citizens are deemed as having the Settled status in the UK for the purpose of Naturalization. See page 15 of <noindex>https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/go...uide-feb-18.pdf</noindex> “Irish nationals The position of Irish citizens is different to that of other EEA nationals. Irish citizens are not normally subject to any form of immigration control on arrival in the United Kingdom, because Ireland is part of the Common Travel Area. If you are an Irish national, you will be free of immigration time restrictions for naturalization purposes. You do not need to apply for a permanent residence document before you apply for naturalization.”

Приветствую, Итак : Подскажите пожалуйста, подаем документы на ЕЕU FP. Муж британец, живем в Германии. Переезжать планируем вместе с нашими детьми. Там работы пока нет, работает в Германии, повлияет ли это? - В принципе нет Нужно ли показывать что то по фин требованиям? - Смотря, что Вы имеете в виду. Если по Surinder Singh - то нужны доказательства того, что муж был экономически активен в EU. Жить будем у родителей пока не найдем работу. Как к этому всему отнесется ХО на ваш взгляд? - Нормально относятся. После FP и въезда в страну, какой должен быть следующий шаг? - Подача на 5-и летнюю визу по форме EEAFM.

06 July 2018 – Read the reviews about our assistance to immigrants and their families like yours 😊 And as usual, the useful and just interesting UK & EEA Immigration Law news and updates from the Legal Centre - www.legalcentre.org – Mob : +44(0)7791145923 >>> Today the Home Office updated for the 3rd time in JUST 4 MONTHS its SETO application form: <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...he-uk-form-seto</noindex> One can use the old form within the 21 calendar days from the date the new form is being introduced (and provided the correct fee is paid). >>> Current UK BA Guidance on registering children as British citizens : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...policy-guidance</noindex>

Секция Payment при подачи в личном визите не заполняется.