British Lawyer

Не совсем понятно. Обычно заявления родителя и ребенка на FP подаются одним пакетом и одним пакетом рассматриваются. Вы точно уверены, что причина в этом ? Может, зависимость не доказали ?

Приветствую, Далековато, учитывая что дорого у Уэльсе через горы и в обход. Вы от нам так часа 3 минимум.

Обычно не взвращают, но бывает как у предыдцщего автора.

С 05-11-2015 изменились правила. Нужно пересдавать. Уровень должен быть B1 CEFR = IELTS 4.0 по каждой из категорий. Вообще то сейчас все решается простым собеседование в течение 10 минут: <noindex>http://www.trinitycollege.com/site/?id=3220</noindex>. Хотя можно и IELTS сдать.

Пока никто не просил "ускорять", т.к. в принципе и так быстро рассматривают. Вы первоисточник смотрели ? Не думаю, что за 1 день. Возможно, кто-то подскажет, кто это делал.

Привет, Из тех 10-15 заявлений в прошлом по делам клиетов на Украине, которым я помогал, средний срок составил 7-10 дней. quote name='LanaUA' date='15.11.2015, 17:55' post='1080945'] Добрый вечер. Кто-то может подсказать сколько времени (в среднем) занимает получение гостевой визы после подачи документов? Виза на 6 мес. Спасибо

Студентам иммигрантам - да. Британцы студенты не имеют таких ограничений.

Было такое разрешено (про просроченность) до 5 ноября 2015 года. Все клиенты (особенно "тирщики") проходили тогда с просрояенными на 2-5 лет IELTS. На ILR и на натурализацию нужен один и тот же уровень - B1 CEFR.

Можете объяснитить, что это поездки буду повторяться каждый год, и проиложить т.н. план поездок и сопутствующие доказательства.

<ВИР> Immigration Digest November 2015-2 • Policies affecting migrant NHS workers, House of Commons Library Briefing Paper, 16 October 2015: <noindex>http://researchbriefings.parliament....mmary/CBP-7337</noindex> •The childcare provision does not count as ‘public funds’ under para 6 of the Immigration Rules •New AN (Naturalization) Application form: <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/public...itizen-form-an</noindex> Recent case-law •The Supreme Court found a duty on the Secretary of State to apply its policy of evidential flexibility in Mandalia v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 59 The Court of Appeal has given its judgment on the interpretation of section 94B of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 (the ‘deport first appeal later’ provisions) in R (Kiarie and Byndloss v Secretary of the State for the Home Department) [2015] EWCA Civ 1020. •In VS v the Home Office [2015] EWCA Civ 1142, the Court of Appeal provides helpful dicta on the construction of Home Office policies on assessing age and on the detention of children who are age disputed. •Mitchell (Basnet revisited) [2015] UKUT 00562 (IAC) 1. The decision of the Tribunal in Basnet v SSHD [2012] UKUT 0113 (IAC) does not put the burden of proof on the Secretary of State where the application was, on its face, insufficiently completed. 2. The evidence shows that the payment pages are retained for 18 months. Thus, within that period, any question of the reason for failure to obtain payment can be investigated, although the reasons for declining a payment are available only to the bank account holder, not the Secretary of State. In the light of this, a more nuanced approach to the burden of proof may be needed. •Ayinde and Thinjom (Carers – Reg.15A – Zambrano) [2015] UKUT 00560 (IAC) (i) The deprivation of the genuine enjoyment of the substance of the rights attaching to the status of European Union citizens identified in the decision in Zambrano [2011] EUECJ C-34/09 is limited to safeguarding a British citizen’s EU rights as defined in Article 20. (ii) The provisions of reg. 15A of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2006 as amended apply when the effect of removal of the carer of a British citizen renders the British citizen no longer able to reside in the United Kingdom or in another EEA state. This requires the carer to establish as a fact that the British citizen will be forced to leave the territory of the Union. (iii) The requirement is not met by an assumption that the citizen will leave and does not involve a consideration of whether it would be reasonable for the carer to leave the United Kingdom. A comparison of the British citizen’s standard of living or care if the appellant remains or departs is material only in the context of whether the British citizen will leave the United Kingdom. (iv) The Tribunal is required to examine critically a claim that a British citizen will leave the Union if the benefits he currently receives by remaining in the United Kingdom are unlikely to be matched in the country in which he claims he will be forced to settle.

· Statement of changes to the Immigration Rules HC535 - более подробно On asylum, significant changes are made to the revocation of or refusal to renew Refugee Status or Humanitarian Protection that will be applicable to decisions on cases made from 19 November 2015. Asylum claims from EU nationals are also to be considered invalid unless exceptional circumstances apply. The definition of a case working error for the purpose of administrative review is expanded to include where the original decision-maker’s decision not to request specified documents under paragraph 245AA of the Rules (to correct minor omissions) was incorrect. The rules allow applicants to submit evidence that was not before the original decision-maker to demonstrate this case working error and enable reviewers to request such documents. This is likely to be a response to the judgment in Mandalia v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 59. Changes to the Rules on family and private life will require an EEA national to hold a valid document confirming their right of permanent residence in order to meet the requirement of ‘present and settled in the UK’ for applications under the family Immigration Rules. The Rules also make provision for refusal of a child’s application for entry clearance where the Secretary of State considers that the sponsor or their partner poses a risk to the child. Amendments are made the evidential requirements for applications under the various categories of Tier 1 of the Points Based System. There are also changes affecting sportspersons in Tiers 2 and 5 and charity workers in Tier 5. Among changes relating to Tier 2 of the Points Based System, nurses are being added to the Shortage Occupation List on an interim basis pending a more detailed examination by the Migration Advisory Committee as to whether there is a national shortage of nurses or specific nursing job titles. The Migration Advisory Committee has issued a call for evidence on nursing shortages with a deadline of 31 December 2015. The change means that nurses will be exempt from the Resident Labour Market Test and given higher priority in the allocation of restricted certificates of sponsorship. It also means that nurses will be exempt from the earnings threshold when they apply for settlement and this exemption will apply to nurses currently sponsored in Tier 2 even if nurses are removed from the Shortage Occupation List following the outcome of the review. Finally, there is a welcome clarification of the visitor rules allowing visitors to undertake a maximum of 30 days study and 30 days volunteering with a registered charity (each) provided that these are not the main purpose of their visit. Tier 1 The Migration Advisory Committee has published its report on the Tier 1 (Entrepreneur) category. It is very positive about graduate entrepreneurs; very negative about the Tier 1 (Entrepreneur) category. At the same MAC recommended that the ”genuineness” test be scrapped and replaced by an assessment by industry experts. There is also interesting information about the likelihood that international trade links are one of the main benefits that Tier 1 entrepreneurs bring where they are investing into established UK businesses. Meanwhile Professor Sir David Metcalf, giving evidence to the Home Affairs Select Committee, said of the Tier 1 Investor visa ”You are not selling passports, you are selling settlement, but right now we are giving it away. We are giving settlement away.” He described it as ”absolutely not fit for purpose.” He pointed out that the investor is paid interest on his/her money which, when citizenship is obtained, is given back to the investor. This he did not see as a good deal for the taxpayer. Transparency International has brought out a report Gold Rush: Investment visas and corrupt capital flows into the UK which identifies that the Tier 1 (Investor) visa has been used for corrupt capital flows into the UK, particularly from China and Russia. The report, citing the National Crime Agency and the Financial Times, identifies that ”…suspicious activity reporting of money laundering is low to negligible. This is particularly concerning for professional gatekeeper sectors, such as accountancy and law that have been rated by the Home Office and HM Treasury as ‘high risk’ in term of vulnerability to money laundering. The National Crime Agency have repeatedly highlighted a concern with poor quality reporting of money laundering suspicions from across the private sector, particularly from the legal sector. Nationality The British Nationality (General) (Amendment No. 3) Regulations 2015 (2015/1806) come into force on 12 November 2015. The big change is that applicants relying upon an EU right of permanent residence in the United Kingdom for nationality law purposes must provide with their application a valid permanent residence card or document certifying permanent residence or a residence permit or residence document issued under the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2000 (SI 2006/1003) which is endorsed under the immigration rules to show permission to remain in the United Kingdom without limit of time. This prevents those fed up with delays and mistakes in EEA casework from cutting to the chase and going straight to the Nationality Directorate which has historically been more reliable in such matters.

Приветствую и поздравляю ! Был рад помочь.

AN. Дочь клиента, только исполнилось 18 лет. Подали 25-08-2015. Сегодня пришел approval. Итого 10 недель.

EEAPR x 2. Подавали в июне, в начале ноября прислали BRP со статусом Permanent Residence.

Заявление клиентов, семья их 4 человек. Продление визы по категории Sole Representative, FLR(BUS). Подал заявление клиентов 27-08-2015. Решение о продлении пришло 24-10-2015.

TOEFIL не засчитывается из-за скандала с моженничеством в 2014 году...

Пожалуйста :-)

Возможно, я не так прочитал сообщение. Из последних 10-15 заявлений сначала приходила BRP карта клиента, потом оригинальные документы. Было так же наооборот, т.е. сначала приходили документы с решением, потом курьер DX приносил BRP карту.

Тогда не выполняются правила на ПМЖ за 5 лет. Возможен переход на категорию ПМЖ за 10 лет. Не просто. Дорого. Нужно продлять визу 3 раза...Расходы...большие.

Обычно вмсесте приходят, когда посылаются одновременно. А почему послали отдельно ?

EEAPR x 2. Подавали в июне, в начале ноября прислали BRP со статусом Permanent Residence.

На этой недели пришли 2 Permanent Residence карточки клиентов по 2 заявлениям. Рассматрвали от 4 до 4.5 месяцев.

Виза, ведущая к ПМЖ по супружеской категории, на основании UK Immigration Law.

Если именно на EEA Family Permit - то бесплатно. 65 ф уже для "продления" EEA Residence Documentation после приезда. И выдают пластиковую BRP карточу тогда уже.

У Вас один и тот же вопрос в разных темах. См. мой ответ в соседней теме на основании опыта работа с подобным делом.