British Lawyer

Хорошо, рад был помочь.

В свое время можно было приехать в центральный офис DVLA в Swansea и сделать все на месте, чтобы не отавать паспорт...

+1...........

21 March 2017 - UK & EEA Immigration Law Updates from the Legal Centre ENG: Legal Centre’s Services at a glance: <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/</noindex> RUS: Вкраце об услугах Legal Centre: <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/language.php?lang=ru</noindex> ⦁ The Sheffield Visa Section will also process PBS and EEA applications submitted in: · Pakistan · Tunisia · Morocco · Russia · India (non Priority only) · Sri Lanka (non Priority only) · Minsk · Paris ⦁ Are citizens of the Republic of Ireland deemed to be Settled in the UK ? Immigration Rule 15 states that: 15.The United Kingdom, the Channel Islands, the Isle of Man and the Republic of Ireland collectively form a common travel area. A person who has been examined for the purpose of immigration control at the point at which he entered the area does not normally require leave to enter any other part of it. However certain persons subject to the Immigration (Control of Entry through the Republic of Ireland) Order 1972 (as amended) who enter the United Kingdom through the Republic of Ireland do require leave to enter. This includes: (i) those who merely passed through the Republic of Ireland; (ii)persons requiring visas; (iii)persons who entered the Republic of Ireland unlawfully; (iv)persons who are subject to directions given by the Secretary of State for their exclusion from the United Kingdom on the ground that their exclusion is conducive to the public good; (v)persons who entered the Republic from the United Kingdom and Islands after entering there unlawfully or overstaying their leave. Irish nationals have a special status in UK law which is separate to and pre-dates the rights they have as EU citizens. Ireland is not considered to be a “foreign country” for the purpose of UK laws, and Irish citizens are not considered to be “aliens”. Irish citizens are treated as if they are settled in the UK from the date they take up “ordinary residence” here. s50(1) of the BNA 1981 describes an “alien” as a person who is neither a Commonwealth citizen nor a British protected person nor a citizen of the Republic of Ireland. “Foreign country” is also defined as a country other than the United Kingdom, a British overseas territory, a country mentioned in Schedule 3 and the Republic of Ireland; This special status affects Irish nationals’ rights across a number of areas, including eligibility for British citizenship, eligibility to vote and stand for election, and eligibility for certain welfare benefits. As a result, they have more advantageous rights than other EU/EEA nationals in some areas. So, it may be assumed that citizens of Ireland can apply for nationality because they have a qualifying immigration status for the purposes of Schedule 1, 2A(d) of the BNA 1981 meaning they just have to meet the other requirements of residence and good character etc. ⦁ EEA citizens need to have formally obtained Permanent Residence document in the UK on the basis of the British Nationality (General) (Amendment No. 3) Regulations 2015 in order to be able to Naturalize in the UK ⦁ The use of the Home Secretary’s power to strip a British citizen of their citizenship is on the rise. It has been the subject of debate where its use has rendered a person stateless following a series cases in the higher courts. The case of K2 v the United Kingdom (Application No 42387/13) K2 is another said example. In K2, the attempt focused on the applicant’s right to a private and family life under article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The complaint was declared inadmissible, in a judgment in which the applicant’s private life and family feature very little indeed ⦁ Student accused of ETS fraud found to have been unlawfully detained In R (on the application of Iqbal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWHC 79 (Admin) the Secretary of State for the Home Department (SSHD) was found to have unlawfully detained a claimant whom they had alleged had fraudulently obtained an Educational Test Service (ETS) certificate to show that he spoke English to the level required for his immigration application. The Home Office decided to remove him under s.10 Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 ⦁ The UK’s spousal and family visa regime: some reflections after the Supreme Court judgment in the MM case: <noindex>http://legalresearch.blogs.bris.ac.uk/2017...in-the-mm-case/</noindex>

Приветствую, 1) Отзыв пасопрта возможет ТОЛЬКО посредством заполнения on-line формы: <noindex>https://eforms.homeoffice.gov.uk/outreach/R..._Documents.ofml</noindex> 2) В форме есть возможность ИЛИ отозвать ВСЕ заявление, ИЛИ чтобы вернули ТОТ или ИНОЙ документ Если возрвзают все документы = заявление аннулировано. Что вернули Вашему сыну ?

Данный тред - про EEA Family Permits. Заявления же "жен британцев" рассматриваются в Шеффилде, но это в другом треде. А вообще UK Immigration Rules считаются мамыми сложными в мире. Без грамотного адвоката все сложнее и сложнее становится разобраться во всем правильно. Хотя "нет ничего невозможного".

В правилах - 3 года. Это если только в контексте Вашего вопроса. Есть и другие требования с "баном" до 10 лет. Я на связи, если хотите получить грамотну и исчерпывающую консультацию : <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html</noindex>

Да. Регулярно с этом сталкиваюсь. Так и пишут в отказах (примерно) "...Ваша мать в прошлый раз показала письмо, где Ваш отец РАЗРЕШИЛ Ваш выезд за рубеж, а теперь Ваша мать пробует доказать SOLE RESPONSIBILITY....не бьется !"... Но отказа, потенциально, можно избежать, если грамотно создать "цепочу" документов, показывающих изменение ситуации

Копию их обращения получили ? Они - точно имеют право заниматься адвокатской деятельностью, т.е. их (а не другой фирмы) представитель был с Вами в суде и т.п. или как иногда бывает, консультанты низшего уровня (только заполнить анкету !) кто просит других юистов им помочь (Такие консультанты переодически образаются ко мне. Сначала удивлялся, потом - привык) и в итоге получается цепочка. Можете в приват ответить.

Вот, собственно говоря, детали (особо важное - выделено): A new Statement of Changes to the Immigration Rules (HC 1078) was published on the 16th March 2017. The headlines are below with further details in the resource which will probably be updated as the change was generally a "massive" one (269 pages). Headlines · Change to Part 1 providing that an applicant can only have one outstanding application for leave to remain at a time with any subsequent application lodged while another is pending treated as a variation application · The period of overstaying permitted before a re-entry ban is imposed is reduced from 90 days to 30 days, with certain periods disregarded · There is a change to the language of one of the provisions where leave must be refused for those subject to the restricted leave policy · Tier 1: in Tier 1 (Entrepreneur), there are technical changes to drafting and certain evidential requirements, including an amended definition of ‘invested funds’. Changes to Tier 1 (Graduate Entrepreneur) allow remaining allocations of places to be allocated to endorsing bodies throughout the year rather than on the fixed date of 30 September. Tier 1 (Exceptional Talent) contains changes requested by Arts Council England and Tech City UK. In Tier 1 (General), the time for applicants to respond to further information requests is reduced from 28 working days to 28 calendar days · The second phase of changes following the MAC review is introduced to Tier 2 (General) and Tier 2 (ICT) including changes to salary thresholds and the closure of the Short Term Staff category of the ICT route. In a further change to both categories related to the Immigration Skills Charge, Certificates of Sponsorship will be considered invalid if any charge that applies is not paid in full · Other changes to Tier 2 (General) include a new requirement for those intending to work in education, health and social care sectors and their adult dependents to provide a criminal record certificate · There are a number of smaller changes in Tier 4, Tier 5 and on some matters relevant to all Points-Based System routes · The problematic definition of ‘continuous’ for the purpose of residence requirements introduced in the last Statement of Changes is deleted for family members of Points-Based System migrants · Small changes to Appendix FM and FM-SE, including on requirements for recognition of marriage, on certain evidential requirements, and to make provision that limited leave to remain granted to a child in line with their parent will be subject to the same condition on recourse to public funds, and to make changes to evidential requirements · Visitor rules allow for applications for visit visas to be made at any post in the work that is designated to accept them. The list of Permit free Festivals is updated

Вот, собственно говоря, детали (особо важное - выделено): A new Statement of Changes to the Immigration Rules (HC 1078) was published on the 16th March 2017. The headlines are below with further details in the resource which will probably be updated as the change was generally a "massive" one (269 pages). Headlines · Change to Part 1 providing that an applicant can only have one outstanding application for leave to remain at a time with any subsequent application lodged while another is pending treated as a variation application · The period of overstaying permitted before a re-entry ban is imposed is reduced from 90 days to 30 days, with certain periods disregarded · There is a change to the language of one of the provisions where leave must be refused for those subject to the restricted leave policy · Tier 1: in Tier 1 (Entrepreneur), there are technical changes to drafting and certain evidential requirements, including an amended definition of ‘invested funds’. Changes to Tier 1 (Graduate Entrepreneur) allow remaining allocations of places to be allocated to endorsing bodies throughout the year rather than on the fixed date of 30 September. Tier 1 (Exceptional Talent) contains changes requested by Arts Council England and Tech City UK. In Tier 1 (General), the time for applicants to respond to further information requests is reduced from 28 working days to 28 calendar days · The second phase of changes following the MAC review is introduced to Tier 2 (General) and Tier 2 (ICT) including changes to salary thresholds and the closure of the Short Term Staff category of the ICT route. In a further change to both categories related to the Immigration Skills Charge, Certificates of Sponsorship will be considered invalid if any charge that applies is not paid in full · Other changes to Tier 2 (General) include a new requirement for those intending to work in education, health and social care sectors and their adult dependents to provide a criminal record certificate · There are a number of smaller changes in Tier 4, Tier 5 and on some matters relevant to all Points-Based System routes · The problematic definition of ‘continuous’ for the purpose of residence requirements introduced in the last Statement of Changes is deleted for family members of Points-Based System migrants · Small changes to Appendix FM and FM-SE, including on requirements for recognition of marriage, on certain evidential requirements, and to make provision that limited leave to remain granted to a child in line with their parent will be subject to the same condition on recourse to public funds, and to make changes to evidential requirements · Visitor rules allow for applications for visit visas to be made at any post in the work that is designated to accept them. The list of Permit free Festivals is updated

Изменение в Иммиграционных Правилах от 16-03-2017 - всего 269 страниц (!) The changes in the UK Immigration Rules have been announced today. The document has 269 (!) pages of changes: <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...8-16-march-2017</noindex> Детали - чуть позже, разбираюсь...

Изменение в Иммиграционных Правилах от 16-03-2017 - всего 269 страниц (!) The changes in the UK Immigration Rules have been announced today. The document has 269 (!) pages of changes: <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...8-16-march-2017</noindex> Детали - чуть позже, разбираюсь...

Приветствую, Все очень просто, так как все четко задокументировано в Правилах: штраф через суд = автоматический отказ на протяжении трех лет = нет смысла подавать - потеряете деньги. Вот простая ссылка для не-юристов: <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/syste...anuary_2017.pdf</noindex> См. стр. 15.

Привет, Игорь, Да, понимаю. Главное, чтобы письмо с фразой "разрешаю (= контролирую ! = мама не 100% (т.е. solely) контролирует воспитание и передвижение ребенка = ОТКАЗ !!!) выезд ребенка за рубеж" не попал в UK VAC...

Приветствую, Раньше так было, потом ввели биометрику, потом начался Брексит, стали подавать больше заявлений. Сотрудников не стало больше в UK BA, а заявлений - намного больше. Поэтому я заметил, что UK BA в свое время поменял содержание CoA, и 6 месяцев они отсчитывают с даты выдачи CoA...

Беларусь, рассматривали в Варшаве.

Все может быть. Если офицеру не разжевать почему (+ доказательства связи) не родственник "первого колена" вяступает спонсором - отказ возможен.

Для гостевой визы нет ограничений (как, например, для визы жены британца) в том, кто формально определяется как "спонсор". Вы сами ответили на свой вопрос.

....чтобы задердать в случае отказа...чтобы получив отказ, не сбежали на другой адрес...

Приветствую, Да, одинаково. Google Вам в помощь о, например, Trinity College London certificate: <noindex>https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=b1+certif...h8V_4fXv9sb6DM:</noindex>

Приветствую, Я лично с Вами уже общался по Skype...довольно долго, в выходной, по приципу pro bono... Как у Вас дела сейчас ?

У меня на прошлой неделе парень получил EEAFP. Рассмотрели за 10 дней. Вы раньше нигде не накосячили, случайно ? Все правильно сдели, все данные указали ?

14 March 2017 - UK & EEA Immigration Law Updates from the Legal Centre ENG: Legal Centre’s Services at a glance: <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/</noindex> RUS: Вкраце об услугах Legal Centre: <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/language.php?lang=ru</noindex> ⦁ Home Office ends policy of automatic settlement for refugees after five years: <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...ule-334-process</noindex> The Home Office has announced a new policy of reviewing whether all refugees require protection at the end of a five year initial period of leave. The policy appears to be effective immediately for all refugee settlement applications, including for refugees already resident in the UK and who were expecting to qualify automatically for settlement. ⦁ New Criminality Checks requirement for certain types of Tier 2 applications From April 2017, the Government plans to extend the requirement to provide a criminal record certificate to the following applicants: <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/syste...cy_Guidance.pdf</noindex> - Tier 2 (General) entry clearance applicants coming to work in the education, health and social care sectors - Partners of the main applicants as above - Partners applying overseas to join an existing Tier 2 (General) migrant working in one of these sectors. Certificates must be provided for any country in which the applicant has resided for 12 months or more (whether continuously or in total) in the last 10 years prior to their application, while aged 18 or over ⦁ Draft Immigration Skills Charge Regulations 2017 - The Immigration Skills Charge: <noindex>https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/l...g/126/12602.htm</noindex> These draft Regulations impose an obligation on persons who sponsor skilled migrants from certain overseas territories to pay a charge in respect of each skilled migrant whom they sponsor - the immigration skills charge. In the light of data showing that, on average, employers in the UK under-invest in training compared with other countries, the Government have said that they want to incentivise employers to invest in training the resident workforce, through the introduction of the charge, thus reducing reliance on migrant workers. ⦁ UK BA requirements in relation to documents certification: <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/certifying-a-document</noindex> ⦁ UK BA interactive tool in relation to the so-called "Right to Rent": <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/landlord-immigration-check</noindex> ⦁ Ukrainian prison conditions breach Article 3 but draft evaders can still be sent back says Upper Tribunal: <noindex>http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/IAC/2017/79.html</noindex> 1. At the current time it is not reasonably likely that a draft-evader avoiding conscription or mobilisation in Ukraine would face criminal or administrative proceedings for that act, although if a draft-evader did face prosecution proceedings the Criminal Code of Ukraine does provide, in Articles 335, 336 and 409, for a prison sentence for such an offence. It would be a matter for any Tribunal to consider, in the light of developing evidence, whether there were aggravating matters which might lead to imposition of an immediate custodial sentence, rather than a suspended sentence or the matter proceeding as an administrative offence and a fine being sought by a prosecutor. 2. There is a real risk of anyone being returned to Ukraine as a convicted criminal sentenced to a term of imprisonment in that country being detained on arrival, although anyone convicted in absentia would probably be entitled thereafter to a retrial in accordance with Article 412 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. 3. There is a real risk that the conditions of detention and imprisonment in Ukraine would subject a person returned to be detained or imprisoned to a breach of Article 3 ECHR. ⦁ UK BA re-entry bans: <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/guidance/immigration-rul...nds-for-refusal</noindex> The Home Office can impose entry bans to individuals who have previously breached immigration law or used deception in their applications for leave. Bans can last 1 year, 2 years, 5 years or 10 years. When does the re-entry ban period start ? The ban period will start on the date an individual left UK or, if there in the case of a 10 year ban following the use of deception in an application, from the date of the refusal of that application. When do re-entry bans do not apply ? Re-entry bans do not apply to applications made under: - Appendix FM (Immigration Rule A320) - Appendix Armed Forces (Immigration Rule B320) - EEA Regulations, namely applications for a European Family Permit Under rule 320(7B), those who breached immigration law while they were minors will also not be subject to re-entry bans. Also, there are some exemptions for other groups of individuals, where the entry bans do not apply, too. In particular, re-entry bans do not apply to those who: - Were not aware that the documents they submitted or the representations made with previous applications were false. - Those who have been issued with a visa despite a re-entry ban being in place. - Those who were in the UK without permission after 17 March 2008 but who left before 1 October 2008 - Victims of trafficking - Where a student was refused leave after 1 September 2007 solely on the basis that the made an out-of-time application. One should bear in mind, however, that the individuals above (with the exception of those applying under the EEA Regulations), might still be caught by Immigration Rule 320(11), which gives the Secretary of State the power to refuse an applicant who has “previously contrived in a significant way to frustrate the intentions of the Rules” (i.e., as per Rule 320 (7B), an individual overstayed, breach the condition of their leave, was an illegal entrant or used deception in an application for leave, when “there are other aggravating circumstances”, such as absconding, making frivolous applications, not complying with a re-documentation process etc. This is a discretionary ground for refusal, which means that the Secretary of State may decide whether or not to refuse an application on this ground

Приветствую, Попросите адвоката прислать копию письма в трибунал, т.е. попросите их доказать, что эта работа была сделана. Все гениальное - просто. Для сравнения: я работаю с клиентами по фиксированному тарифу, т.е. заранее оговоренную сумму, то есть с моей стороны смысла держать клиента нет, так как я сам первый заинтересован получить клиенту визу и идти дальше работать с другим клиентом, а как может быть иначе ? А вот если у той фирмы почасовая оплата....Тогда они будут считать за работу по принципу pay as you go, что обычно намного дороже (для клиента) нежели фиксированный тариф... Поэтому клиенты с других фирм часто переходят ко мне или же сразу обрщаются ко мне - я бы на их месте то же самое сделал :-)