British Lawyer

18 April 2016 - UK & EEA Immigration Law News and Updates from the Legal Centre, www.legalcentre.org, the UK Professional Immigration Assistance Epicentre ⦁ UK Visas and Immigration (UKVI) guidance: Illegal working closure notice and compliance orders (13 April 2017): <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...-orders#history</noindex> This guidance is issued for frontline staff, mainly immigration officers, who will use the new powers in the Immigration Act 2016 to issue closure notices and apply for compliance orders to prevent illegal working. ⦁ New guidance on validity, variation and withdrawal of immigration applications: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/specified-application-forms-and-procedures Quite a helpful guide to the technical aspects of immigration applications. This guidance is for decision makers and describes how to decide whether an application for leave to remain in the UK is valid, and what to do if it is not. It also describes how an applicant can vary and withdraw an application and how to calculate the date of application. ⦁ Court of Appeal gives guidance on meaning of ‘unlawful residence’: <noindex>http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/format.cgi?d...v/2017/236.html</noindex> The case of Akinyemi v SSHD [2017] EWCA Civ 236 concerns the deportation of a man born and raised in the United Kingdom, a country he has never left. It provides valuable guidance on the meaning of the word ‘unlawful’ within the context of deportation provisions introduced by the Immigration Act 2014 and shows just how far the law has moved in this area. ⦁ Rare and worrying insight into asylum casework at the Home Office: <noindex>https://www.theguardian.com/public-leaders-...-cuts-syria-war</noindex> "After that, targets increased to the point that almost everything became subservient to the end-decision. We were set a target of 220 “units” a year. Only an interview or a decision would count as a unit – any casework would not. If I had to call social services because I was concerned about a child, it didn’t count towards this target. It might be an afternoon’s work to do all the right referrals, but ultimately this wouldn’t be credited. That sort of work was disincentivised. If you wanted to do the right thing, you would have to take the productivity hit and risk performance management procedures, ultimately with the threat of dismissal.".

+1........... Подтверждаю (после проведения консультации с автром).

Да, можете объеденить два письма в одном.

В секции Additional Information или в Cover Letter можете это объяснить. Анкета не унииверсальная, Вы не первый, кто с этим сталкивается.

Для заявлений в UK апостиль обычно не нужен.

13 April 2016 - UK & EEA Immigration Law News and Updates from the Legal Centre, www.legalcentre.org, the UK Professional Immigration Assistance Epicentre ⦁ What happens if you paid a UK BA fee before the UK BA fee increase but your PEO application date is after the fee increase date Not to panic. See para 17 below. This happens each year and from our experience we have never had a need to pay a further fee. We in fact make sure clients have paid and booked for the PEO appointments before the fee increase comes in where possible (typically for slots up to 6 weeks after 5 April but sometimes the fee increase can be implemented earlier – end of March, for example). <noindex>http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2017/51...20170515_en.pdf</noindex> Payments for in person applications 17.—(1) Where— (a) an application is made in person; and ( the applicant pays the fee in relation to such an application prior to the date that the application is made, the fee payable is that in relation to the relevant application on the date of payment. (2) In this regulation, the date of payment means the date on which the payment is made by the applicant, unless it is made by post, in which case it means the date that the payment is posted. ⦁ Does the Trinity College English language certificate expire if a test was taken in 2014 ? It does. After the 6th April 2015, SELT test were introduced. Anyone submitting an application required to do a new SELT test. They have a 2 year expiry date. See Appendix O of the Immigration Rules and FM 1.21 English Language Guidance

Хорошо. До связи.

После этого скандала и многочисленных судов - врял ли: <noindex>http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-26024375</noindex>

Приветствую, Не все так просто. У работодателя должны быть лицензия для приема иностранцев на работу. Я регулярно помогаю работодателям оформлять такие лицензии для иностранных рабочих. Для начала я могу Вам объяснить принципы и требования к получению как лицензии для работодателя в UK, так и рабочей визы: <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html</noindex> Иначе есть риск, что Вы пойдете по неправильному пути... Выбор за Вами.

Првиетствую, Итак: А deception это из-за того что подавали без меня в стране? - Как минимум - да. Вообще, нужно знать, что за заявление подавали ? Нельзя ли это констатировать как подача "от моего имени"? - См. выше. Что за заявление вообще это было ? Имею ли я какие-либо шансы на позитивный результат? - Если Вы имеете в виду "сейчас", то не имею понятия пока не будут выяснены детали выше. А если Вы имеете в виду 2020 год - скорее всего "да", автоматически, т.к. пройдут 10 лет. Хотя заявление рассматриваете по всех факторам Правил на момент подачи. и последний вопрос, как можно оплатить консультацию с Украины? Думаю Ваша помощь будет необходима, если Вы возьметесь за меня, конечно. - Как и все остальные граждане Украины - PayPal или банковской картой, кто регулярно записывается ко мне на консультации через наш сайт: <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html</noindex>

Пожалуйста. Всего хорошего.

Company, позвольте Вам помочь в контексте вопросы автора, иначе у форумчан может сложится обсолютно неправильное понимание ситуации. Итак: 1. а муж работает официально и постоянно, что за виза такая на 6 месяцев с правом работы? - EEA Family Permit, основание - Regulation 12 не забывайте что до получения разрешения на работу и после окончания 6 месяцев с отрицательным результатом это противоречит закону. - У муже был Certificate of Application, он обычно выдается каждый раз, когда заявление подается в UK BA. CoA действует 6 месяцев. 2. не муж должен работать, а вы - муж может сидеть дома с ребенком - Это очень категоричная рекомендация. Есть категория self-sufficiency, где EEA может не работать а вместо этого работает non-EEA. В таком случае так же нужна т.н. Private Comprehensive Medical Insurance на всех членов семьи автора. 3. имхо суда не избежать. И почему вы не подали на апеляцию еще при первом отказе? понимаю что дорого и долго, так-как суды сейчас редко назначают раньше года(очереди) - Не согласен. Я вчера консультировался с автором и видел оригиналы отказов UK BA. К сожалению, UK BA был прав. Автором были допущены ошибки, на основании которых были выданы отказы. Путь апелляции в этом случае - не верный... 4. Да, и ему теперь лучше не выезжать. Шансов попасть в скором времени назад официально маловато. ему паспорт без визы могут вернут только в аэропорту, если решит выехать - Согласен. Тем не менее, автор после консультации со мной сейчас готовит заявление и я помогу ему получить EEA Residence Permit на основании Regulation 17. 5. а на суде ребенок это в большинстве случаев плюс - Теоретически. В контексте автора - практически нет...

Приветствую, Если бы дело просто кончилось нелегальным пребыванием, то за это "всего" Вы бы получили бан на 1 год с даты возвращения домой. То есть этого бана у Вас уже нет, т.к. с момента Вашего возвращения прошел уже 1 год. По поводу заявления которое Вы как бы подали когда Вам не было. Это серьезнои называется deception. Цена deception - 10 лет бан с даты решения UK BA. Т.е. 2010+10 = 2020... Нужно знать все детали. Если у Вас серьезные намерения, я здесь: <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html</noindex>

По интернету проще - работает визуальная память, плюс сразу видите неправильные ответы.

Приветствую, Это будет являться грубейшим нарушение закона. Штраф для работодалеля около £11 0000. Вы так же ничего не получите с точки зрения ПМЖ и т.п.

+1............ Но это первоисточник на английском, а автор запутался с треде на русском....

12 April 2016 - UK & EEA Immigration Law News and Updates from the Legal Centre, www.legalcentre.org, the UK Professional Immigration Assistance Epicentre ⦁ A brief history of immigration rules separating migrant families can be found here: <noindex>https://www.lrb.co.uk/v39/n07/frances-webber/short-cuts</noindex> ⦁ New Home Office guidance on status of EEA citizens/Brexit (7 April 2017): <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/guidance/status-of-eu-na...ss-than-5-years</noindex> ⦁ Updated UK Visas and Immigration Guidance: Derivative rights of residence & extended family members of EEA nationals (11 April 2017) - Extended family members of EEA nationals: <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...f-eea-nationals</noindex> - Derivative rights of residence: <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...ts-of-residence</noindex> ⦁ The Transfer for Determination of an Application for International Protection (Detention) (Significant Risk of Absconding Criteria) Regulations 2017 (SI 2017/405) (10 April 2017) Link: <noindex>http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2017/405/contents/made</noindex> The Transfer for Determination of an Application for International Protection (Detention) (Significant Risk of Absconding Criteria) Regulations 2017 (SI 2017/405) came into force at noon on 15 March 2017. Under article 28 of the Dublin III Regulation, Regulation (EU) No. 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013, a person who has made an application for international protection may only be detained where they present a significant risk of absconding. Article 2(n) provides that “risk of absconding” means the existence of reasons in an individual case, which are based on objective criteria defined by law, to believe that the individual who is subject to a transfer procedure may abscond. These regulations set out the criteria which will be considered to determine whether a person who has claimed asylum in the UK, but whose application is subject to the Dublin III Regulation procedure, presents a significant risk of absconding for the purpose of considering whether they should be detained. The Explanatory Note says "The urgency arises from the handing down on 15 March 2017 of a ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union in the case of Al Chodor C-528/15 on the interpretation of the Dublin III Regulation". In its 15 March 2017 judgment on that case, the Court of Justice considered the case of an Iraqi father and his two children who were detained by the Czech police in May 2015 pending their transfer to Hungary pursuant to the Dublin Regulation and Article 129(1) of the Czech Aliens Act. The detention was challenged before a Regional Court, which ruled it to be unlawful since the Czech legislation contained no objective criteria defining “risk of absconding”. The Supreme Administrative Court referred a question for a preliminary ruling on the need for objective criteria in legislation to define a ‘risk of absconding’. The Court held that Article 2(n) of the Dublin III Regulation requires the criteria to establish a ‘risk of absconding’ to be ‘defined by law’, in a binding provision of general application. In the absence of that, Article 28(2) does not apply and detention on this ground must be declared unlawful. that “settled case-law confirming a consistent administrative practice . . . cannot suffice.”

Видел я такие. Английский обычно есть.

Пожалуйста. Рад был помочь.

Начните здесь, если не получается: <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html</noindex>

Приветствую, На основании того, что Вы рассказали, Вы оба раза неправильноподали заявление. Документы мужа не вернули (см. письмо из UK BA) - UK BA ожидает, что он покинет страну. Я могу помочь. Для начала нужна стандартная Skype или телефонная консультация: <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html</noindex>

11 April 2016 - UK & EEA Immigration Law News and Updates from the Legal Centre, www.legalcentre.org, the UK Professional Immigration Assistance Epicentre ⦁ An EEA national, who obtains Permanent Residence status in the UK, does not need to maintain qualified person status in the future in order to reside in the UK, sponsor other family members etc ⦁ The current version of the Retained Right of Residence (if a non-EEA national divorces an EEA national) can be found here: <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...ht-of-residence</noindex> ⦁ General grounds for refusal: criminal convictions, public good, character, conduct and associations Criminal convictions and other signs of poor character can, unsurprisingly, negatively affect applications for leave to enter or remain in the UK. This has always been so, but in December 2012 the rules were changed to permanently ban entry of those with serious convictions, other than in certain very narrow circumstances, and to impose entry bans of various lengths in other cases. General grounds for refusal of applications for entry clearance or leave to enter are set out at paragraph 320 of the Immigration Rules and general grounds for refusal of applications to extend or vary leave are set out at paragraph 322 ⦁ The UK BA is clearly profiteering on the migrants New fees for immigration and nationality applications come into effect on 6 April 2017. The changes include an increase of 18% in settlement (ILR) applications to £2,297 and dependent relative applications to a huge £3,250. Many suspect the Home Office makes a hefty profit on these fees. They are correct. The actual cost of processing an ILR application is £252 and a naturalisation application cost the Home Office £386. Most outrageous is the application fee for registering a child as British. The fee in 2017 is £973, which has just gone up yet again, but the actual cost was £386. It is not just individual migrants who are being squeezed for fees. The Immigration Skills Charge Regulations 2017 have also been published, coming into effect on 6 April 2017. These impose on employers who recruit foreign workers from outside the EU a charge of £1,000 per worker per year. A lower charge of £364 per worker per year is applicable to small businesses and universities and some exemptions apply. The charge only applies to new recruits, not existing ones. ⦁ Upper Tribunal dismisses appeal against deprivation of citizenship of Rotherham sex gang: Ahmed and Others (deprivation of citizenship) [2017] UKUT 118 (IAC) The official headnote: (i) While the two fold duties enshrined in section 55 of the Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Act 2009 are imposed on the Secretary of State, the onus of making representations and providing relevant evidence relating to a child’s best interests rests on the appropriate parental figure. (ii) A failure to discharge this onus may well defeat any argument that there was a proactive duty of enquiry on the Secretary of State in a given context. (iii) In deprivation of citizenship cases, section 55 issues arise at two stages: at the deprivation of citizen stage and at the later stage of proposed removal or deportation. (iv) As the subject of national citizenship lies exclusively within the competence of Member States, EU law has no role to play in deprivation cases: G1 v SSHD [2012] EWCA Civ 867 applied. (v) The Secretary of State’s deprivation of citizenship policy confers a wide margin of appreciation on the decision maker. (vi) Part 5A of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 does not apply to deprivation of citizenship decisions as such decisions are not made under the Immigration Acts. (vii) There would be a considerable saving of human and financial resources with consequential reduced delay if deprivation of citizenship and deportation or removal decisions were to be made jointly. ⦁ The recent changes in the UK Immigration Law in relation to lodging concurrent applications and/or variation of the existing application The pare 34BB states that: “34BB : (1) An applicant may only have one outstanding application for leave to remain at a time. (2) If an application for leave to remain is submitted in circumstances where a previous application for leave to remain has not been decided, it will be treated as a variation of the previous application. (3) Where more than one application for leave to remain is submitted on the same day then subject to sub-paragraph (4), each application will be invalid and will not be considered. (4) The Secretary of State may give the applicant a single opportunity to withdraw all but one of the applications within 10 working days of the date on which the notification was sent. If all but one of the applications are not withdrawn by the specified date each application will be invalid and will not be considered. (5) Notice of invalidity will be given in writing and served in accordance with Appendix SN of these Rules.” These changes are intended to ensure that applicants are aware that they cannot submit applications simultaneously. The UK BA is also making changes to the online and paper application forms to make this much clearer for the applicant and, of course has updated their guidance on validity to reflect this position. The guidance can be found on the UK BA web-site. Where an application is varied it must meet all the requirements of paragraph 34 of the Immigration Rules for the variation to be valid. An applicant can still submit one application while a previous application is outstanding. The second application will have the effect of varying the first and, accordingly, only one fee is payable. ⦁ According to Dave Hollings Tennant, Immigration and Border Policy Directorate Home Office, there are no fees for settlement applications from stateless persons, despite the earlier UK BA fee increase announcement implying that it would

Приветствую, KET уже как пару лет не принимается. В текущей версии тестов, которые засчитывает UK BA KET нет. Не рискуйте. Пересдавайте. P.S. IELTS был и остался в списке. IELTS, даже просроченный, принимается.

+1............. Если Вы жили в Польше (территория EU), то так проще подавать.

С инфляцией, скорее всего, и желанием UK BA выйти на полную сомоокупаемость в следующей году (+ еще повышение госпошлины !).