British Lawyer

Приветствую. NIN не относится к иммиграциии и получается отдельно в офисе Job Centre.

28 September 2017 - Useful Immigration News from the Immigration Lawyers who can help you - www.legalcentre.org - Ph: 0330 001 0342 or 07791145923 Under the para V3.9A (Rules for Visitors), an overtsay is committed when a person remained in the UK without a leave (visa) for : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/guidance/immigration-rul...v-visitor-rules</noindex> - (a) 90 days or less, where the overstaying began before 6 April 2017; or - ( 30 days or less, where the overstaying began on or after 6 April 2017

Так обычно происходит, если раньше был отказ. Я давал ссылку на форуме не один раз на E-mail, по которому можно запросить и дубликат Biometrics, и дубликат Certificate of Application.

Приветствую, Довольно обще и у меня были бы встречные вопросы по оформлению части Ваших документов перед тем, как сказать "да" или "нет". Основная анкета заполняется on-line. Appendix 2 и SU-07 - рукой. Если self-employed - в SU-07 вписыватся данные self-employment как в Appendix 2 Нет упоминания о том, как Вы выполняете Financial Requirement...

Appendix FM - Financial requirement, Section 9 Вам в помощь : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/syste...ement_Final.pdf</noindex>

Все будет хорошо, Вы указали все используемые Вами имена, как я понял.

То же столкнулся с этой ситуацией. Ждали с клиенткой до середины-конца августа и подали по ускоренному в надежде что рассмотрят за 2 недели. Прошло уже 3+ недели, а воз и ныне там. В итоге начал писать письма в Sheffield и подключаем MP.

Да. Начали рассматривать 5000 задержанных ранее дел по MM case. Возник эффект бутылочного горла...

Отличные новости. От себя - рад был помочь. NB Ускоренное рассмотрение не работает, увы...Обратите внимание те, кто собирается подавать (оснбенно с детьми).

Да, бывают и такие случаи, когда мамы уезжают и пробут забрать детей через х лет. В вопросе автора Выше она только собирается уезжать, т.е. у нее пока есть выбор - забирать ребенка сейчас или потом.

26 September 2017 - Useful Immigration News from the Immigration Lawyers who can help you - www.legalcentre.org - Ph: 0330 001 0342 or 07791145923 - Deprivation and nullity of the UK citizenship Guidance : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...policy-guidance</noindex> - Further funds wasting from the UK BA - Assisted Digital service for online immigration applications : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...and-immigration</noindex> Instead of making the forms shorter and to the point the UK BA has appointed the 3rd party agency to tell the applicant on how to complete the on-line based applications. This 3rd party support service will not be able to provide the legal advice, naturally. In other words, this 3rd party will generally be able to tell something like "write you name in the "Your name" box". Very "useful" use of the funds. - Immigration (EEA) Regulations 2006 continue to apply for appeals according to the Tribunal : <noindex>http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/IAC/2017/165.html</noindex> The Immigration (EEA) Regulations 2006 are apparently preserved for appeals (or rights of appeal) already commenced on 1 February 2017, which was not the case when the 2006 Regulations replaced the predecessor 2000 Regulations (see MG and VC (EEA Regulations 2006; “conducive” deportation) Ireland[2006] UKAIT 00053). - Further guidance from Upper Tribunal on withdrawal of immigration appeals : <noindex>http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/IAC/2017/295.html</noindex> This Guidance is important in those cases where the Home Office does withdraw a decision once the appeal has been lodged. Official headnote: (i) The public law character of appeals to the FTT is reflected in the regulatory requirement governing the withdrawal of appeals that any proposed withdrawal of an appeal must contain the reasons for the course mooted and must be judicially scrutinized, per rule 17 of the FTT Rules and rule 17 of the Upper Tribunal Rules. (ii) Judicial evaluation of both the withdrawal of an appellant’s appeal and the withdrawal of the Secretary of State’s case or appeal is required. (iii) Every judicial determination of an appellant’s proposal to withdraw an appeal or the Secretary of State’s proposal to withdraw requires a brief outline of the reasons for the decision. The purpose of the judicial scrutiny is to ensure that the appeal is being properly and correctly withdrawn. (iv) Judicial scrutiny will normally result in the mooted withdrawal of the appeal being perfected by transmission of the notice to the parties required by Rule 17(iii). However, this will not occur automatically: for example where the proposed withdrawal lacks coherence or is based on a clear material misunderstanding or misconception. (v) The outcome of the judicial scrutiny should be briefly reasoned. (vi) Rule 29 of the FTT Rules is confined to the substantive determination of appeals. (vii) The power of the FTT to set aside a decision under Rule 32 is exercisable only by the FTT President and the Resident Judges. (viii) In cases where an unsuccessful appellant has a choice, best practice dictates that an application to set aside the impugned decision of the FtT under Rule 32 be first exhausted in advance of the lodgement of an application for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal. Where both species of challenge are lodged simultaneously, it will be sensible to assign them to the same Judge where feasible. - Tribunal can (but won’t) hold Home Office in contempt for ignoring consent orders : <noindex>http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/IAC/2017/198.html</noindex> The facts of R (on the application of MMK) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (consent orders – legal effect – enforcement) [2017] UKUT 198 (IAC) involved the not uncommon scenario of the Home Office withdrawing its decision in response to an application for judicial review, agreeing a consent order which included an agreement to pay the costs of the claimant and to make new decision be made within a certain time and then failing to comply with that consent order. Deception, causation and deprivation of British citizenship : <noindex>http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/IAC/2017/367.html</noindex> In Sleiman (deprivation of citizenship; conduct) [2017] UKUT 367 (IAC) the tribunal considered the question of how directly causative past deception must be of a subsequent grant of British citizenship in order for a person to be deprived of that citizenship on the basis of deception. The official headnote: In an appeal against a decision to deprive a person of a citizenship status, in assessing whether the appellant obtained registration or naturalization “by means of” fraud, false representation, or concealment of a material fact, the impugned behaviour must be directly material to the decision to grant citizenship.

Приветствую. Рад был помочь.

Пожалуйста. Рад был помочь.

И визы можно отменить. Например, муж может отменить визу жены, написам письмо в UK BA. Варианты есть в с е г д а.

Скорее всего - да, т.к. чем дальше мама отребенка и чем больше мама не живет с ребенком, тем сложнее потом получить визу ребенку. Опять же нужно плмнить о том, первичная виза - на 6 месяцев, а продление делатеся только по почте и занимает около 6-и месяцев.

25 September 2017 - Useful Immigration News from the Immigration Lawyers who can help - www.legalcentre.org - Ph: 0330 001 0342 or 07791145923 ⦁ UK banks to check 70m bank accounts in search for illegal immigrants : <noindex>https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/se...egal-immigrants</noindex> The UK BA is advancing its formally "Hostile Environment" doctrine. From 2018 the banks will be quarterly checking all 70 000 000 UK accounts to find the accounts held by the illegal migrants. In some cases it is yet not to late to get legal if you have children and/or partner in the UK. We can help.

Приветствую, Работаю с этой категорией регулярно. Если правила выполняются - визы выдают всегда. Обращаются, тем не менее, клиенты, кто подавали самостоятельно и где ДЕТИ получали отказы. Хотя бывает, что обращатся клиенты, кому помогали другие "представители" и не смотря на это все равно получен отказ. В случае отказа обычно есть право апелляции. Срок ожидания слушания апелялции после ее подачи ПОЛТОРА ГОДА. Практически 99% отказов из-за предоставления письма-разврешения от биологического отца где он говорит что ОН РАЗРЕШАЕТ выезд ребенка. После этих задокументированных слов доказать что мама была ЕДИНОЛИЧНО ответственна за воспитание ребенка, как этого требуют правила, очень трудно. В зависимости от ситуации я рекомендую обратиться к Игорю для оформления того или иного документы с украинской стороны для улучшения шансов на получение визы. На прошлой неделе по рекомендации женщих с этого форума со мной консультировались 2 британца-партнера именно по поводу т.н. Sole Responsibility : <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html</noindex> (RUS, есть английская версия : <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/Initial-Consultation.html)</noindex> Я объяснил, как правильно оформить самый главный документ чтобы максимально повысить шансы получения визы для РЕБЕНКА. С одним я уже начал работу по принципу "Общее сопровождение" : <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/Obshee-soprovozdenie.html</noindex> (RUS, есть английская версия : <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/Genera-supervision.html)</noindex> Я на связи если Вам нужна моя помощь.

Приветствую, BRP в личном визите физически не могут выдать в тот же жеть т.к. BRP выпускается в другом месте. Из моего опыты подачи заявлений клиентов в личном визите процентов 99% BRP приходили на третий день. Очень редко - чуть позже. Пару раз было не приходили даже в течение 7-10 дней, тогда я звонил знакомому менеджеру в наше местное и PEO, и, как Вы могли догадаться, BRP просто забывали заказать. Все решалось на тот же третий день после такого разговора. Я на связи если нужна качественная и своевременная помощь.

Хорошее начало дня сегодня. Очередная выиграная апелляция (в данном случае - дело гражданки Украины и ее ребенка-британца (заявление по принципу "Zambrano" - DRF1)). Как это често происходит с моей помощью, суд постановил UK BA выплатить компенсацию моей клиентке :

Приветствую. Увы, тормозят, даже по срочной подаче...

Приветствую. Вы не полностью ознакомились с требованиями Guidance по Permanent Residence для EU/non-EEA. Я могу помочь и все объяснить на родном для Вас языке : <noindex>https://legalcentre.org/Konsultacija-s-Advokatom.html</noindex>

Да. Можно. Я писал об этом раньше : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/cancel-visa</noindex> Есть и другие варианты, разумеется.

21 September 2017 - Useful Immigration News from the Immigration Lawyers who can help - www.legalcentre.org - Ph: 0330 001 0342 or 07791145923 ⦁ Can an appellant withdraw his/hers appeal and lodge a fresh application instead ? Apparently, yes, in line with Para 39E : Exceptions for overstayers 39E. This paragraph applies where: (1) the application was made within 14 days of the applicant’s leave expiring and the Secretary of State considers that there was a good reason beyond the control of the applicant or their representative, provided in or with the application, why the application could not be made in-time; or (2) the application was made: (a) following the refusal of a previous application for leave which was made in-time or to which sub-paragraph (1) applied; and ( within 14 days of: (i) the refusal of the previous application for leave; or (ii) the expiry of any leave extended by section 3C of the Immigration Act 1971; or (iii) the expiry of the time-limit for making an in-time application for administrative review or appeal (where applicable); or (iv) any administrative review or appeal being concluded, withdrawn or abandoned or lapsing. ⦁ Can the UK BA return the applicant's passport in case the application was refused so the applicant, for example, could take the English language test (for a different application) ? Apparently, yes. The Home Office has a policy to return passports to allow someone to sit the test. The information can be usually found in the ‘SELT Frequently asked questions document’ dated March 2017. It states: “What if my passport is held by the Home Office and I don’t have a valid Biometric Residence Permit or EU Identity Card? You should contact the Home Office to request the return of your passport”. You can find this document at: <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...-language-tests</noindex>. ⦁ Check your visa or immigration application status on the UK BA web-site via this link : <noindex>https://contact-ukvi.homeoffice.gov.uk/app/...isastatus"</noindex> ⦁ UK BA clarifies on the cooling of period : "...where a migrant has had more than one period of Tier 2 leave in the last 12 months and each CoS was assigned for less than 3 months, even where they may total over 3 months, the cooling off period will not apply". The Rule: Para 38.9 of the Tier 2 and 5: guidance for sponsors: "The cooling off period does not apply where the migrant: … was only in the UK as a Tier 2 migrant during the last 12 months for a short period(s) with a CoS which was assigned for 3 months or less. This could be where a migrant: … has had more than one period of Tier 2 leave in the last 12 months and each CoS was assigned for less than 3 months, even where they may total over 3 months, the cooling off period will not apply Recent case-law ⦁ R (on the application of Islam and Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Tier 2 licence-revocation-consequences) [2017] UKUT 00369 (IAC) (18 September 2017) : <noindex>https://tribunalsdecisions.service.gov.uk/u...c/2017-ukut-369</noindex> Unlike the situation for Tier 4 applicants, a person whose sponsor's Tier 2 licence was revoked for non-compliance with the Immigration Rules is not entitled to challenge a decision not to provide him/her with a period of 60 days in which to secure an alternative sponsor. Patel [2011] UKUT 211 (IAC) distinguished. ⦁ Sleiman (deprivation of citizenship; conduct) [2017] UKUT 00367 (IAC) (19 September 2017) : <noindex>https://tribunalsdecisions.service.gov.uk/u...c/2017-ukut-367</noindex> In an appeal against a decision to deprive a person of a citizenship status, in assessing whether the appellant obtained registration or naturalisation “by means of ”fraud, false representation, or concealment of a material fact", the impugned behaviour must be directly material to the decision to grant citizenship. ⦁ UK Visas and Immigration Guidance - Detention and reporting (asylum instructions) : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/d...um-instructions</noindex> ⦁ UK Visas and Immigration Guidance - Asylum claims in detention : <noindex>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/...ms-in-detention</noindex>

Приветствую, Формально процедуры "отменить по желанию" нет. Государство может только отменить карту если Вы не выполните то или иное условеи правил или перестанете быть членом семьи гражданина EU. Или карта может просто сама по себе закончиться.

19 September 2017 - Useful Immigration News from the Immigration Lawyers who can help - www.legalcentre.org - Ph: 0330 001 0342 or 07791145923 ⦁ Can the Home Secretary really be guilty of contempt of court for breach of a court order ? : <noindex>http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-...t-a7950866.html</noindex> Apparently, yes, they can. The Home Office has been in the news for what one judge described as a “prima facie case of contempt of court.” Officials are reported to have breached multiple orders for the return of asylum seeker Samim Bigzad from Afghanistan to the United Kingdom. Ultimately, though, in legal terms it is Home Secretary Amber Rudd who is responsible for those actions. It is unlikely she personally sanctioned breach of the order. ⦁ Stubble banned at work for Home Office immigration officers : <noindex>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/09/13...ation-officers/</noindex> Britain's immigration officers have been told they are not allowed to sport stubble at work. Dress code guidance published by the Home Office on Tuesday advised staff that an "unshaven or stubble appearance" is not permitted - although full beards and moustaches are allowed. Should a worker wish to grow facial hair, they must do so "at a time that minimises the period when you present an unprofessional image," according to the advice. The Home Office said the rules are specifically for Immigration Enforcement's Criminal and Finance Investigation(CFI) teams, who have a public-facing role. A spokesman for the government department added: "There is no Home Office formal dress code." ⦁ Is “residence” the same as “presence” in the Immigration Rules ? : <noindex>http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/IAC/2017/76.html</noindex> ? Yes, “residence” is the same as “presence”, at least in paragraph 245AAA(a) of the Immigration Rules, says Upper Tribunal Judge Allen. Official headnote: " (i) On a proper construction of paragraph 245AAA(a)(i) of HC 395, an absence from the United Kingdom for a period of more than 180 days in one of the relevant 12 month periods will entail a failure to satisfy the requirements of paragraph 245CD. (ii) The term ‘residence’ in paragraph 245AAA(a) is to be equated to presence." ⦁ Human rights, long residence and the integration test in the Court of Appeal : <noindex>http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2017/1284.html</noindex> Interesting case in relation to the “integration test” in the Immigration Rules to resist an individual’s removal on human rights grounds. The current rules can in some circumstances require a consideration of whether there would be “very significant obstacles” to an individual’s re-integration in that country if they were to be removed or deported. See the details in the links above ⦁ Leaked immigration document suggests huge rise in European criminal deportation after Brexit The recently leaked government immigration proposals indicate that European nationals who commit crime in the UK will be subject to the same automatic deportation rules as non-European nationals after Brexit. The UK Borders Act 2007 imposes a legal duty on the Home Office to bring deportation proceedings against any foreign national convicted of a crime and sentenced to 12 months or more in prison. These are referred to as “automatic deportation”: see section 32 of the UK Borders Act 2007. There is currently an exception for those resident under EU law (section 33(4)) but this will end with Brexit when EU law ceases to apply. 12 month sentences are imposed for a whole range of crimes, including ‘moment of madness’ offences such as getting into a fight in a pub, or on the street, or for breaching an ASBO.